[Bug 278311] amdtemp: Does not recognize AMD Threadripper 7960X

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278311 --- Comment #5 from Joel Bodenmann --- Does not seem to work yet. Still not getting any temperatures (via sysctl or sysutils/hwstat). Looking through /var/log/messages I see: 7306 Apr 12 00:37:15 hedt1 kernel: amdtemp0: on hostb24 7307

[Bug 278311] amdtemp: Does not recognize AMD Threadripper 7960X

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278311 --- Comment #4 from Xin LI --- Created attachment 249918 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=249918=edit Add support for F19 M10 (0x10..0x1f) Could you please try this patch? -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 278316] Intel Atom S1200 (Centerton) serial UART not working

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278316 --- Comment #6 from Henrich Hartzer --- Pull request on Github: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/pull/1164 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 278316] Intel Atom S1200 (Centerton) serial UART not working

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278316 --- Comment #5 from Henrich Hartzer --- I got it working! Patch is attached. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 278316] Intel Atom S1200 (Centerton) serial UART not working

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278316 --- Comment #4 from Henrich Hartzer --- Created attachment 249917 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=249917=edit Atom S1200 UART support -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 278311] amdtemp: Does not recognize AMD Threadripper 7960X

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278311 --- Comment #3 from Joel Bodenmann --- Created attachment 249916 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=249916=edit dmesg.boot -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 278311] amdtemp: Does not recognize AMD Threadripper 7960X

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278311 --- Comment #2 from Joel Bodenmann --- Created attachment 249915 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=249915=edit pciconf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 278316] Intel Atom S1200 (Centerton) serial UART not working

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278316 --- Comment #3 from Henrich Hartzer --- >From FreeBSD, dmesg also shows IRQ 16. But sysctl -a seems to say that IRQ 32 is in use for the uart. I've had no luck forcing it to use IRQ 16. But... with debug.uart_force_poll = 1, it works! So

[Bug 278311] amdtemp: Does not recognize AMD Threadripper 7960X

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278311 Xin LI changed: What|Removed |Added CC||delp...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 265884] AMD 4700S Desktop Kit and amdtemp driver

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265884 Xin LI changed: What|Removed |Added CC||delp...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 278316] Intel Atom S1200 (Centerton) serial UART not working

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278316 --- Comment #2 from Henrich Hartzer --- I tried to force IRQ 16 (FreeBSD uses 32) with device.hints, but it stays at IRQ 32. I'm not sure if this is a problem or not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Bug 278316] Intel Atom S1200 (Centerton) serial UART not working

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278316 --- Comment #1 from Henrich Hartzer --- I just verified that this is working on a hardware level by booting Linux Mint and testing the port. dmesg (from Linux) said: "ttyS4 at I/O 0xf000 (irq = 16, base_baud = 115200) is a 16550A" --

[Bug 278316] Intel Atom S1200 (Centerton) serial UART not working

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278316 Bug ID: 278316 Summary: Intel Atom S1200 (Centerton) serial UART not working Product: Base System Version: 14.0-RELEASE Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: New

[Bug 271675] cp: Interrupted system call

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271675 --- Comment #12 from Alan Somers --- (In reply to Rick Macklem from comment #11) fuse_vnop_read or fuse_vnop_write might return EINTR if: * uiomove(9) returns ERESTART or EINTR * getblk returns NULL * bwrite returns EINTR * If a signal is

[Bug 271675] cp: Interrupted system call

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271675 Rick Macklem changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asom...@freebsd.org --- Comment

[Bug 276961] buildworld artifacts not reproducible between native and cross build

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 Dimitry Andric changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open CC|

[Bug 278311] amdtemp: Does not recognize AMD Threadripper 7960X

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278311 Joel Bodenmann changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People -- You are

[Bug 278311] amdtemp: Does not recognize AMD Threadripper 7960X

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278311 Bug ID: 278311 Summary: amdtemp: Does not recognize AMD Threadripper 7960X Product: Base System Version: Unspecified Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New

[Bug 278295] add net 128.0.0.0: gateway 10.8.1.1 fib 1: Invalid argument

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278295 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||regression -- You are receiving

[Bug 277450] "poweroff" does not power off the system when EFI is used

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277450 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Dreibholz --- FreeBSD is the guest system in VirtualBox. It does not have any VirtualBox guest utilities port installed when the issue occurs. I only tried Linux as VirtualBox host, yet. I useful place for some

[Bug 277450] "poweroff" does not power off the system when EFI is used

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277450 --- Comment #15 from Oleksandr Kryvulia --- (In reply to Thomas Dreibholz from comment #14) I think port's pkg-message is a right place. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 278305] clang crashes: fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: t71: v32bf16 = insert_subvector t67, t64, Constant:i32<16> (on the port misc/ncnn)

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278305 Yuri Victorovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@freebsd.org

[Bug 278305] clang crashes: fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: t71: v32bf16 = insert_subvector t67, t64, Constant:i32<16> (on the port misc/ncnn)

2024-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278305 Bug ID: 278305 Summary: clang crashes: fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: t71: v32bf16 = insert_subvector t67, t64, Constant:i32<16> (on the port misc/ncnn)

[Bug 234576] hastd exits ungracefully

2024-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234576 Trenton Hensley changed: What|Removed |Added CC||childrenlopside...@gmail.co

[Bug 271259] A simple misprint in the BHYVE(8) documentation

2024-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271259 Neil Phillips changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tensepeb...@gmail.com --- Comment

[Bug 271675] cp: Interrupted system call

2024-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271675 --- Comment #10 from Rick Macklem --- I believe the EINTR would be coming from the I/O operation done by sshfs. For the NFS mounts, it occurs for "soft" mounts when the NFS server takes too long to reply to an RPC. - It was returned by the

[Bug 277677] /bin/rmdir should exit with status code 2 for invalid arguments

2024-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277677 --- Comment #1 from Henrich Hartzer --- Opened a pull request for this: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/pull/1161 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 278295] add net 128.0.0.0: gateway 10.8.1.1 fib 1: Invalid argument

2024-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278295 Bug ID: 278295 Summary: add net 128.0.0.0: gateway 10.8.1.1 fib 1: Invalid argument Product: Base System Version: 14.0-RELEASE Hardware: Any OS: Any

[Bug 235136] cron email header has bogus date value

2024-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235136 Michael Osipov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||micha...@freebsd.org --- Comment

[Bug 271675] cp: Interrupted system call

2024-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271675 --- Comment #9 from Ivan Rozhuk --- I suspect that more correct is ignore EINTR error limited times and only then fallback to generic copy. So IMHO usage pattern must be one of: size_t ntry; const size_t max_ntry = 5; for (ntry = 0;

[Bug 271675] cp: Interrupted system call

2024-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271675 --- Comment #8 from Ivan Rozhuk --- (In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #7) According to man copy_file_range [1] EINTR also may happen "for files on some NFS mounts.", so it is not new problem, it is documented behavior. You may ask

[Bug 271675] cp: Interrupted system call

2024-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271675 --- Comment #7 from Mark Johnston --- (In reply to Ivan Rozhuk from comment #6) Well, I'm not going to commit a patch that works around an unknown problem in just one utility that happens to use copy_file_range(). I'm not asking you to

[Bug 271675] cp: Interrupted system call

2024-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271675 --- Comment #6 from Ivan Rozhuk --- (In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #5) I have no idea why this happen. I do not try to run cp under ktrace and have no plans to debug whole kernel fs stack. My investigation was: "what happen with

[Bug 276985] crash in LinuxKPI/drm

2024-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276985 --- Comment #8 from Vlad Biley --- (In reply to feh from comment #7) Hi Erwin, Thanks for your reply. Here's my story in detail: https://www.reddit.com/r/freebsd/comments/1b80lpi/gpu_has_fallen_off_the_bus_a_sad_story_about_my/ I wrote

[Bug 276985] crash in LinuxKPI/drm

2024-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276985 --- Comment #7 from f...@fehcom.de --- Hi Vlad, thanks for your comment. On my side, there is a bit more history: a) Before I used the current MiniPC with AMD Ryzen 5, I had a similar device with Ryzen 7, a Gigabyte BRR7-4800. b) Here,

[Bug 276985] crash in LinuxKPI/drm

2024-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276985 --- Comment #6 from Vlad Biley --- (In reply to feh from comment #4) >finally, there is a pattern: The crash happens moving objects (files) by means >of Gnome's nemo on the desktop (copy/move files). Unfortunately (or fortunately?), I

[Bug 276985] crash in LinuxKPI/drm

2024-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276985 --- Comment #5 from Vlad Biley --- Created attachment 249875 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=249875=edit core.txt Hi. This is a follow-up to my comment #3. On my previous RX 560 GPU, crashes happened frequently

[Bug 276985] crash in LinuxKPI/drm

2024-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276985 f...@fehcom.de changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People --- Comment

[Bug 278286] file(1) man page fixes

2024-04-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278286 Bug ID: 278286 Summary: file(1) man page fixes Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me

[Bug 278283] /usr/bin/calendar: 11 bugs fixed, major improvements [tarball]

2024-04-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278283 --- Comment #1 from w...@psr.com --- typo: I meant "now in the calendar-data port" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 278283] /usr/bin/calendar: 11 bugs fixed, major improvements [tarball]

2024-04-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278283 Bug ID: 278283 Summary: /usr/bin/calendar: 11 bugs fixed, major improvements [tarball] Product: Base System Version: Unspecified Hardware: Any OS:

[Bug 275965] periodic: add a daily zfs trim

2024-04-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275965 --- Comment #2 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=493908c4b45c7b75e4a6b4aea3b5b63ea5c268d5 commit 493908c4b45c7b75e4a6b4aea3b5b63ea5c268d5 Author:

[Bug 278281] /usr/sbin/fstyp potential read through wild pointer

2024-04-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278281 Bug ID: 278281 Summary: /usr/sbin/fstyp potential read through wild pointer Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New

[Bug 27810] rpc.statd can loop

2024-04-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27810 --- Comment #2 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=6e5c3c7067c582416bead63f34ce07e06a86 commit 6e5c3c7067c582416bead63f34ce07e06a86 Author:

[Bug 82881] [netgraph] [panic] ng_fec(4) causes kernel panic after interface detach

2024-04-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82881 Zhenlei Huang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|Closed Resolution|---

[Bug 195407] relayd crashes kernel after update to 10.1-RELEASE

2024-04-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195407 Mark Johnston changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ma...@freebsd.org

[Bug 278265] `route -n monitor' is quiet when redirecting its output

2024-04-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278265 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Streejak --- Created attachment 249853 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=249853=edit adds stdout flush to generic output function the proposed patch. I've compiled and tested route - now it

[Bug 271675] cp: Interrupted system call

2024-04-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271675 --- Comment #5 from Mark Johnston --- But why is copy_file_range() returning EINTR? What happens if you run cp under ktrace (so that signals are logged as well)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 277992] mpr and possible trim issues

2024-04-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277992 --- Comment #7 from m...@sentex.net --- I let the job continue over night and it continues to get slower on writes. i.e after doing a trim -f /dev/da[disk in pool]/p1 one by one, the tests start out fast (~ 300MB of files in the zfs

[Bug 277992] mpr and possible trim issues

2024-04-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277992 --- Comment #7 from m...@sentex.net --- I let the job continue over night and it continues to get slower on writes. i.e after doing a trim -f /dev/da[disk in pool]/p1 one by one, the tests start out fast (~ 300MB of files in the zfs

[Bug 278271] Bug in LLVM's libc++ breaks g++13 (build of math/ceres-solver is broken on armv7)

2024-04-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278271 Yuri Victorovich changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug 278271] Bug in LLVM's libc++ breaks g++13 (build of math/ceres-solver is broken on armv7)

2024-04-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278271 Bug ID: 278271 Summary: Bug in LLVM's libc++ breaks g++13 (build of math/ceres-solver is broken on armv7) Product: Base System Version: 14.0-STABLE Hardware: arm

[Bug 277992] mpr and possible trim issues

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277992 --- Comment #6 from m...@sentex.net --- OK, as suspected. I stopped the test, reset the TRIM method to ATA_TRIM, offlined the disk one by one and did a trim -f /dev/da[disk]p1 one by one and resilvered the pool. After that, I got normal

[Bug 276770] Some potential NULL-pointer dereferences

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276770 --- Comment #8 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch stable/13 references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=9fc935855951ff8277c669b2aa248fde63a10175 commit 9fc935855951ff8277c669b2aa248fde63a10175

[Bug 278265] `route -n monitor' is quiet when redirecting its output

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278265 Bug ID: 278265 Summary: `route -n monitor' is quiet when redirecting its output Product: Base System Version: 14.0-STABLE Hardware: amd64 OS: Any

[Bug 276770] Some potential NULL-pointer dereferences

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276770 --- Comment #7 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch stable/14 references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=7d763eadd36e9b9419379756add71f5383f40af0 commit 7d763eadd36e9b9419379756add71f5383f40af0

[Bug 278245] sendfile to bhyve VM on same host fails with MEXTPG

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278245 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|virtualizat...@freebsd.org -- You

[Bug 278234] linsysfs assumes pci domain 0000

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278234 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|emulat...@freebsd.org -- You are

[Bug 278232] Jail IPv4 source address selection inside a jail not working

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278232 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|j...@freebsd.org -- You are

[Bug 278220] gre: route add -iface invalid argument

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278220 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org -- You are

[Bug 130238] nfs.lockd man page doesn't mention NFSLOCKD option or nfslockd module

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=130238 Dag-Erling Smørgrav changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People

[Bug 278234] linsysfs assumes pci domain 0000

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278234 --- Comment #3 from Zeev Zilberman --- This seems like a good reference for sysfs: https://cromwell-intl.com/open-source/sysfs.html For reference, on a Linux system with 2 domains, a switch connected to each domain and 2 devices behind

[Bug 274538] panic: vrefact: wrong use count 0

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274538 Alex S changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iwt...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 277538] panic: vm_page_assert_unbusied: busy_lock owned by me

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277538 --- Comment #5 from Mark Johnston --- I believe that this commit will prevent that particular panic, but indeed, we're not going to recover well from a swap device being removed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 277538] panic: vm_page_assert_unbusied: busy_lock owned by me

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277538 --- Comment #4 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=4696650782e2e5cf7ae5823f1de04550c05b5b75 commit 4696650782e2e5cf7ae5823f1de04550c05b5b75 Author:

[Bug 277992] mpr and possible trim issues

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277992 --- Comment #5 from m...@sentex.net --- Created attachment 249831 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=249831=edit charting write throughput (90 second pauses between tests) Good news / bad news. The test continued

[Bug 278232] Jail IPv4 source address selection inside a jail not working

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278232 Michael Osipov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cperc...@freebsd.org --- Comment

[Bug 278232] Jail IPv4 source address selection inside a jail not working

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278232 --- Comment #2 from Dirk Meyer --- FreeBSD-13.3 was not tested. My Workaround is to use pf NAT on the HOST. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 278232] Jail IPv4 source address selection inside a jail not working

2024-04-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278232 --- Comment #1 from Michael Osipov --- Did you try 13.3 actually? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 278245] sendfile to bhyve VM on same host fails with MEXTPG

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278245 Bug ID: 278245 Summary: sendfile to bhyve VM on same host fails with MEXTPG Product: Base System Version: 14.0-RELEASE Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: New

[Bug 130238] nfs.lockd man page doesn't mention NFSLOCKD option or nfslockd module

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=130238 Jamie Landeg-Jones changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ja...@catflap.org ---

Problem reports for b...@freebsd.org that need special attention

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and

[Bug 277992] mpr and possible trim issues

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277992 --- Comment #4 from m...@sentex.net --- With max trim set to 1/4 of the default value, I still get random errors. In this case, I set all 4 drives to sysctl -w kern.cam.da.7.delete_max=4294901760 kern.cam.da.7.delete_max: 17179607040 ->

[Bug 278234] linsysfs assumes pci domain 0000

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278234 --- Comment #2 from Konstantin Belousov --- Created attachment 249811 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=249811=edit Fix for the panic, but the layout does not match Linux This is the patch I have. As noted, the

[Bug 278234] linsysfs assumes pci domain 0000

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278234 Konstantin Belousov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@freebsd.org ---

[Bug 272965] 14.0-ALPHA1 too: armv7 'Alignment Fault' on read panic during udp_input for kyua's sys/netinet6/exthdr:exthdr ; other udp_input related panics

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272965 --- Comment #14 from ludwigp-fbsdb...@chip-web.com --- I saw the same panic (except on tcp_input) on FreeBSD 13.x, FreeBSD 14 and FreeBSD 15 snapshots from 20240404, just from receiving an IPv4 SSH connection over the "ure" network

[Bug 278220] gre: route add -iface invalid argument

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278220 Marek Zarychta changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zarych...@plan-b.pwste.edu.

[Bug 278234] linsysfs assumes pci domain 0000

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278234 Bug ID: 278234 Summary: linsysfs assumes pci domain Product: Base System Version: 15.0-CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity:

[Bug 278230] sh: Multiple instances overwrite each other's history

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278230 --- Comment #5 from Aleksei Sukhoguzov --- (In reply to Andrey Korobkov from comment #4) Yeah, now I understand. Glad you solved the problem :) Cheers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 278230] sh: Multiple instances overwrite each other's history

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278230 --- Comment #4 from Andrey Korobkov --- Sorry, I wasn't clear enough: the issue I had with history in tcsh(1) was syncing the history after each issued command between multiple terminal session in gnome-terminal(1) tabs. The solution was

[Bug 278230] sh: Multiple instances overwrite each other's history

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278230 --- Comment #3 from Andrey Korobkov --- I have these in my ~/.cshrc: set history = 1 set savehist = ($history merge lock) And it doesn't work for me. What I may be doing wrong? What to check some more times? -- You are receiving

[Bug 278232] Jail IPv4 source address selection inside a jail not working

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278232 Dirk Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||regression -- You are receiving

[Bug 278232] Jail IPv4 source address selection inside a jail not working

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278232 Bug ID: 278232 Summary: Jail IPv4 source address selection inside a jail not working Product: Base System Version: 14.0-RELEASE Hardware: amd64 OS:

[Bug 278230] sh: Multiple instances overwrite each other's history

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278230 --- Comment #2 from Aleksei Sukhoguzov --- (In reply to Andrey Korobkov from comment #1) I don't use tcsh(1) myself, but it does have a 'merge' option in the 'savehist' variable that seems to do exactly this, or am I missing something? --

[Bug 278230] sh: Multiple instances overwrite each other's history

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278230 Andrey Korobkov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||als...@vinterdalen.se ---

[Bug 278230] sh: Multiple instances overwrite each other's history

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278230 Bug ID: 278230 Summary: sh: Multiple instances overwrite each other's history Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New

[Bug 278229] iconv mapping tables for ISO 8859-2 and 8859-3 contain garbage

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278229 Bug ID: 278229 Summary: iconv mapping tables for ISO 8859-2 and 8859-3 contain garbage Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any

[Bug 278220] gre: route add -iface invalid argument

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278220 Dirk Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||regression --- Comment #1 from Dirk

[Bug 278220] gre: route add -iface invalid argument

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278220 Bug ID: 278220 Summary: gre: route add -iface invalid argument Product: Base System Version: 14.0-RELEASE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New

[Bug 277886] ZFS boot loader gives up too easily on unsupported zpool flags

2024-04-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277886 Warner Losh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i...@freebsd.org --- Comment #4

[Bug 277886] ZFS boot loader gives up too easily on unsupported zpool flags

2024-04-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277886 --- Comment #3 from Tomoaki AOKI --- (In reply to Xin LI from comment #2) > I think the ask is simply make check_feature() and check_mos_features() > (/stand/libsa/zfs/zfsimpl.c) to always return 0 instead of EIO even if > the feature is

[Bug 130238] nfs.lockd man page doesn't mention NFSLOCKD option or nfslockd module

2024-04-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=130238 Vick Khera changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vi...@khera.org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 278195] daemon in jail is exiting without informing that it failed to execute

2024-04-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278195 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||regression

[Bug 278195] daemon is exiting without informing that it failed to execute

2024-04-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278195 Bug ID: 278195 Summary: daemon is exiting without informing that it failed to execute Product: Base System Version: 13.3-RELEASE Hardware: amd64 OS:

[Bug 277886] ZFS boot loader gives up too easily on unsupported zpool flags

2024-04-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277886 Xin LI changed: What|Removed |Added CC||delp...@freebsd.org, |

[Bug 130238] nfs.lockd man page doesn't mention NFSLOCKD option or nfslockd module

2024-04-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=130238 Chris Davidson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Christopher.davidson@gmail.

[Bug 277886] ZFS boot loader gives up too easily on unsupported zpool flags

2024-04-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277886 Tomoaki AOKI changed: What|Removed |Added CC||junch...@dec.sakura.ne.jp ---

[Bug 277992] mpr and possible trim issues

2024-04-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277992 --- Comment #3 from m...@sentex.net --- (In reply to Warner Losh from comment #2) Thanks for looking Warner! The disks are in the same server, either in the SAS enclosure/expander or off the motherboard. Pretty sure power is ok as the

[Bug 277655] random() *not* removed from 14.0-RELEASE

2024-04-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277655 --- Comment #10 from Henrich Hartzer --- Might it be possible for you or someone else to review my patch? If I should submit it through another avenue, please let me know! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Bug 277992] mpr and possible trim issues

2024-04-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277992 --- Comment #2 from Warner Losh --- "Power on reset" sense code means that the drive dropped off the bus (typically). Usually if you can eliminate flakey power (either bad connectors, or inadequate power to cope with maximum power draw),

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >