https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193873
Mark Johnston ma...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193873
Conrad Meyer conrad.me...@isilon.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #147868|0 |1
is
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193873
--- Comment #7 from Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org ---
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D904
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193873
--- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer conrad.me...@isilon.com ---
(In reply to Justin Hibbits from comment #1)
Instead of wrapping with DUMPSYS_HAS_*, why not add wrapper functions in the
md headers, most of which simply call a common routine,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193873
--- Comment #4 from Justin Hibbits jhibb...@freebsd.org ---
(In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #3)
(In reply to Justin Hibbits from comment #1)
Instead of wrapping with DUMPSYS_HAS_*, why not add wrapper functions in the
md
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193873
Conrad Meyer conrad.me...@isilon.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #147599|0 |1
is
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193873
--- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer conrad.me...@isilon.com ---
Created attachment 147869
-- https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147869action=edit
(Just the changes between v1 and v2.)
This isn't the whole patch, just the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193873
Justin Hibbits jhibb...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193873
--- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer conrad.me...@isilon.com ---
(The other issue brought up on IRC is that there is no reason to initialize
both minidumps and full dump headers on PPC (moea{,64}_scan_init), and that
allows us to drop the MD
