On 1/10/2011 12:15 AM, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt t...@mittelstaedt.us
mailto:t...@mittelstaedt.us wrote:
Someone just gave you bad data, Adam.
No that is incorrect. I got my data from MS when I tried to check it
out.
The second you say got
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt t...@mittelstaedt.uswrote:
On 1/10/2011 12:15 AM, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt t...@mittelstaedt.us
mailto:t...@mittelstaedt.us wrote:
Someone just gave you bad data, Adam.
No that is
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04:42:28PM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I think the Luvalley architecture is fascinating but one of the larger
problems that has always been faced by the Open Source Community has
been lack of device driver support for all of the many peripherals and
motherboards
Yes, license is a big problem. And I'm sorry to let you and Brandon
know that Luvalley is currently using KVM's code. And I think it's
hard and unnecessary to write the virtualization code from scratch. Do
you think so?
Best regards,
Xiaodong
2011/1/9 Juergen Lock n...@jelal.kn-bremen.de:
On
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt t...@mittelstaedt.uswrote:
The practical reality of it is I can go out and buy a brand new, super-fast
computer and run FreeBSD 8 on it then VirtualBox on that,
then my guest OS's under VirtualBox - and get the same performance
as a bare-metal
On 1/9/2011 6:51 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt t...@mittelstaedt.us
mailto:t...@mittelstaedt.us wrote:
The practical reality of it is I can go out and buy a brand new,
super-fast computer and run FreeBSD 8 on it then VirtualBox on that,
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt t...@mittelstaedt.uswrote:
Unless Microsoft makes Hyper-V a cost item, this won't happen. The
situation is like the Firefox/Internet Explorer Chinese finger trap.
Maybe I'm not understanding what you mean, but hyper-V is already a cost
item.
- Ursprüngliche Mitteilung -
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt
t...@mittelstaedt.uswrote:
So the point of my story is that I think a modern KVM is just as fast and
featureful as Xen since they both have pci-pass-through and you should
expect the same(roughly)
On 1/9/2011 9:27 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt t...@mittelstaedt.us
mailto:t...@mittelstaedt.us wrote:
Unless Microsoft makes Hyper-V a cost item, this won't happen. The
situation is like the Firefox/Internet Explorer Chinese finger trap.
Hi,
I confirm that I no longer have time for Luvalley. However, I will be
extreemly happy if anybody is willing to take over from me.
Especially, I quite agree to customize Luvalley for FreeBSD, through
it supports all kinds of Dom0 OSes. Howerver, I hope that the LIGHT
architecture of Luvalley
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Xiaodong Yi xdong...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I confirm that I no longer have time for Luvalley. However, I will be
extreemly happy if anybody is willing to take over from me.
Especially, I quite agree to customize Luvalley for FreeBSD, through
it supports all
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 02:02:57PM -0600, Brandon Gooch wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Juergen Lock n...@jelal.kn-bremen.de wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 08:00:01PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Xiaodong Yi xdong...@gmail.com wrote:
I am very
12 matches
Mail list logo
