Hi,
Is anyone working on pthread_cancel?
; Bodo
--
Bodo Rüskamp, b...@rueskamp.com, 51°55' N 7°41' E
(1) Elvis is alive.
(2) Dinosaurs too. http://www.lochness.scotland.net/camera.htm
(3) The next millenium starts on January 1st 2000.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with
Greg Lehey g...@lemis.com wrote:
On Thursday, 17 June 1999 at 3:43:10 -0400, David E. Cross wrote:
I have a drive that is rated at ~16 Meg/second, and indeed it delivers on t
he
order of 15+ Meg/second. If I use Vinum to create a concatinated device
of 2 such units performance drops to
Those of you who were at Usenix may have picked up a free copy of a
UnixWare 7 CD-ROM from SCO. If so, be careful when installing it. I
tried installing it on a machine with two other systems installed. It
failed to install (looped trying to install drivers it didn't need).
When I rebooted, I
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
On Friday, 18 June 1999 at 1:14:20 -0700, Darryl Okahata wrote:
Greg Lehey g...@lemis.com wrote:
On Thursday, 17 June 1999 at 3:43:10 -0400, David E. Cross wrote:
I have a drive that is rated at ~16 Meg/second, and indeed
Those of you who were at Usenix may have picked up a free copy of a
UnixWare 7 CD-ROM from SCO. If so, be careful when installing it. I
...
When I rebooted, I found that it had overwritten the Master Boot
Record (which is silly, since it knew there were two other systems on
the disk), and
On Friday, 18 June 1999 at 8:29:10 +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Those of you who were at Usenix may have picked up a free copy of a
UnixWare 7 CD-ROM from SCO. If so, be careful when installing it. I
...
When I rebooted, I found that it had overwritten the Master Boot
Record (which is silly,
Greg Lehey wrote:
Those of you who were at Usenix may have picked up a free copy of a
UnixWare 7 CD-ROM from SCO. If so, be careful when installing it.
SCO has been a real pain in the bum about partition tables for as
long as I can remember.
Don't even try installing it anywhere other
On Friday, 18 June 1999 at 18:44:50 +0930, Mark Newton wrote:
Greg Lehey wrote:
Those of you who were at Usenix may have picked up a free copy of a
UnixWare 7 CD-ROM from SCO. If so, be careful when installing it.
SCO has been a real pain in the bum about partition tables for as
long as I
It seems Greg Lehey wrote:
FreeBSD, which has the partition number explicitly in the device name.
In my case, FreeBSD was on partition 2, devices /dev/rwd0s2a and
/dev/rwd0s2e. It was moved to partition 3, so the device names
changed to devices /dev/rwd0s3a and /dev/rwd0s3e. Since I didn't
On Friday, 18 June 1999 at 11:29:53 +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Greg Lehey wrote:
FreeBSD, which has the partition number explicitly in the device name.
In my case, FreeBSD was on partition 2, devices /dev/rwd0s2a and
/dev/rwd0s2e. It was moved to partition 3, so the device names
bush doctor wrote:
Once morpheus_...@depechemode.com aka (morpheus_...@depechemode.com) said:
Yesterday I was able to mount my CD-ROM just fine. Today after
a lot of kernel hacking I am not. I am fairly new at this so
this may be a really easy answer.
I have an entry in the fstab file
Greg Lehey wrote:
On Friday, 18 June 1999 at 18:44:50 +0930, Mark Newton wrote:
SCO has been a real pain in the bum about partition tables for as
long as I can remember.
To be fair, this is UnixWare
You mean UnixSwear, don't you? :-)
- mark
Mark Newton
Bodo Rueskamp wrote:
Is anyone working on pthread_cancel?
I've got some stale patches for it which I'll bring up to
date. But to implement the POSIX cancelable functions
correctly will take some hacking of libc. I can do this
also, but it needs further discussion as to how it _should_
be done.
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Bodo Rueskamp wrote:
Is anyone working on pthread_cancel?
I've got some stale patches for it which I'll bring up to
date. But to implement the POSIX cancelable functions
correctly will take some hacking of libc. I can do this
also, but it
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
See the -hackers and -current mailing list archives, and
pay particular attention to Derek Seaman's posts.
Do you mean Richard?
Oops. My sincere apologies to Richard Seaman (whom I actually
meant - is it who or whom?). Derek is another fellow who
happens
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
Those of you who were at Usenix may have picked up a free copy of a
UnixWare 7 CD-ROM from SCO. If so, be careful when installing it. I
tried installing it on a machine with two other systems installed. It
failed to install (looped trying to install
Sheldon and myself have been looking at the wrapping support in inetd, and
I'd be interested to hear what people think on the following issues.
David.
Making wrapping a run time option:
It seems strange to make wrapping a compile time option,
when it could be a command
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999 14:11:26 +0100, David Malone wrote:
Sheldon and myself have been looking at the wrapping support in inetd, and
I'd be interested to hear what people think on the following issues.
Is the general consensus that we absolutely must have wrapper support
built into inetd? What
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 03:30:03PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Is the general consensus that we absolutely must have wrapper support
built into inetd? What we've got right now isn't doing a fantastic job,
and trying to wedge in the job tcpd did before is getting progressively
uglier. :-(
I
Hello.
Would you, please, comment the kernel message below:
sio0: 478 more tty-level buffer overflows (total 478)
I use FreeBSD 2.2.8; there is a modem (without hardware flow control)
on /dev/cua0; I have a leased line with 38400 bps full duplex;
there is PPP (user mode) tunnel to my ISP.
Can linux be booted using the freebsd boot manager? Lilo always seems to
want to install itself.
Dennis
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Many conf tasks remain non-trivial as compared to BSD or Linux due
to inexpertise on SCO's end...as the red Sytem Admin Handbook once
stated (Neveth, Snyder et al.) SCO Unix* is `perverse'.
I enjoy reading the section in that book on network hardware whenever I
need a good laugh. People shouldnt
Would someone (being more experienced than I) review these modifications to
FreeBSD (HEAD)'s bin/dd? In my changes, I've tried to convert every random
int, u_long, etc. to the proper types (off_t, u_int64_t, {,s}size_t,
and keeping the ints that SHOULD be ints), which I am pretty sure I've
done
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 12:24:16PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
Hello, I'm Brian Feldman, a new committer to the FreeBSD source tree! Some
of
the things I'll be working on are:
- maintaining and improving IPFW (cleanups too, of
Hi folks,
I found a thread in the freebsd-hackers archive from 1997 that covered
my question, but the answers didn't nail it down to a yes or no
satisfactorily.
We could save ourselves a lot of angst in the work we're doing on inetd
if we could determine the client IP address of a TCP socket
I also want new-IPFW to be modular. This would mean that, for instance,
DUMMYNET would be just one plug-in to IPFW. More would be created in an
extensible manner, rather than the current hack to do DUMMYNET.
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ___ ___ ___
gr...@freebsd.org
Greg Lehey g...@lemis.com wrote:
On Friday, 18 June 1999 at 1:14:20 -0700, Darryl Okahata wrote:
Possible marginally-related data point: with the 3.1-RELEASE vinum,
and with striped drives (yes, I know the original user is using
concatenated devices), I saw pretty bad write
No action on this in -current for a few days, so let's try
hackers. In response to some suggestions I tried raising the number of
nfsiod's to 20 (the max) and increasing the sysctl cache value to 10,
still no joy.
I'm using amd to automount directories on sun (sol 2.6) server to
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 01:50:09PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 12:24:16PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
Hello, I'm Brian Feldman, a new committer to the FreeBSD source tree!
Some of
the things
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Let's join our efforts in this area!
IPFW code is very ugly...
Which is basically due to it being hacked on for years without a cleanup.
Now's the time (between major versions) to do
Papezik Milon wrote:
I see an acd0 device line in my 3.2 GENERICS config file.
Could someone please explain the diffrence
between wcd0 and acd0 devices?
What has changed?
The name. ATAPI CD-ROMs are now called acd. MAKEDEV will typically
make wcd-acd symlinks in the /dev directory for
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Nicolai Petri wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Let's join our efforts in this area!
IPFW code is very ugly...
implementation, what new features should be added, and where we should
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 12:57:40PM -0600, Wes Peters wrote:
Could someone please explain the diffrence
between wcd0 and acd0 devices?
What has changed?
The name. ATAPI CD-ROMs are now called acd. MAKEDEV will typically
make wcd-acd symlinks in the /dev directory for hysterical
On Thu, Jun 17, 1999 at 02:34:55PM -0400, Ugen Antsilevitch wrote:
The part that obviously interests me is IPFW - if you guys are
interested to put some effort in real i.e. stateful firewall
to be developed i'd love to offer any help i can.
Great!
How we should proceed -- that's the
Greg Lehey wrote:
I've been away from work for several weeks, and I now find that I can
no longer start remote serial gdb. I am using sio0 on the debugged
machine side, and sio1 on the debugging machine side. Here are the
relevant dmesg outputs:
panic (debugged machine):
sio0: system
Dennis wrote:
Can linux be booted using the freebsd boot manager? Lilo always seems to
want to install itself.
Provided you install Linux in a primary fdisk partition (slice 1-4),
it should work OK. The RedHat default is to install to an extended
fdisk partition, and we don't support booting
I have a drive that is rated at ~16 Meg/second, and indeed it delivers on
the
order of 15+ Meg/second. If I use Vinum to create a concatinated device
of 2 such units performance drops to 2.5 Meg/sec. This seems like a
drastic drop in performance.
Indeed, if you're comparing apples
Hello ..
I'm getting the following panic on a P90 running 3.1-RELEASE. This system
is one of our routers and crashes every week or so. I can't find any
reference if this was fixed or not. If someone's been playing in this
area recently I can schedule an upgrade to 3.2 or -STABLE if it would
At 10:07 PM 6/18/99 +0200, you wrote:
Dennis wrote:
Can linux be booted using the freebsd boot manager? Lilo always seems to
want to install itself.
Provided you install Linux in a primary fdisk partition (slice 1-4),
it should work OK. The RedHat default is to install to an extended
fdisk
Dennis wrote:
At 10:07 PM 6/18/99 +0200, you wrote:
Dennis wrote:
Can linux be booted using the freebsd boot manager? Lilo always seems to
want to install itself.
Provided you install Linux in a primary fdisk partition (slice 1-4),
it should work OK. The RedHat default is to install
What do you think about that:
[r...@beta ~]# nmap -vv -p119 -P0 -sT -O betanews.microsoft.com
snip
Sequence numbers: E6E23C4C E7368B4F E6E0CC8D E79B4DEC E7A43C4E E76D208A
Remote operating system guess: Linux 2.1.122 - 2.1.132; 2.2.0-pre1 - 2.2.2
OS Fingerprint:
TSeq(Class=RI%gcd=1%SI=3A46A8)
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 04:29:39PM -0400, Dennis wrote:
At 10:07 PM 6/18/99 +0200, you wrote:
Dennis wrote:
Can linux be booted using the freebsd boot manager? Lilo always seems to
want to install itself.
Provided you install Linux in a primary fdisk partition (slice 1-4),
it should
Around Today, David Malone wrote :
DM I think we may almost be there, and we've unearther problems with inetd
DM that were there anyway - but not as obvious without wrapping. While the
DM process is painful I think the end result may be OK.
As a user, I'd say that it would certainly be nice
I heard that Windows-2000 IS linux :-)
Dennis
At 11:08 PM 6/18/99 +0200, Markus Döhr wrote:
What do you think about that:
[r...@beta ~]# nmap -vv -p119 -P0 -sT -O betanews.microsoft.com
snip
Sequence numbers: E6E23C4C E7368B4F E6E0CC8D E79B4DEC E7A43C4E E76D208A
Remote operating system guess:
On Friday, 18 June 1999 at 7:17:14 -0400, Thomas Good wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
Those of you who were at Usenix may have picked up a free copy of a
UnixWare 7 CD-ROM from SCO. If so, be careful when installing it. I
tried installing it on a machine with two other
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Dennis wrote:
Many conf tasks remain non-trivial as compared to BSD or Linux due
to inexpertise on SCO's end...as the red Sytem Admin Handbook once
stated (Neveth, Snyder et al.) SCO Unix* is `perverse'.
I enjoy reading the section in that book on network hardware
Heya, sorry I tried this one on -stable and -questions and noone seems to
know, and they actually go so far as to ask me how I got two celerons in a
motherboard...
so I ask here.
I have two PPGA(Socket 370) Celeron 333A's that are on MSI6905 Dual Socket
1 adaptors...
a Tyan Thunder 2
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
I have run UnixWare since day 1 - when Novell bought it from USL.
I used it right from the beginning. The problems I recall were
disappearing files and failing NFS config; the latter was crucial for
the work I was doing, and the only way I found to
Pat Lynch wrote:
Heya, sorry I tried this one on -stable and -questions and noone seems to
know, and they actually go so far as to ask me how I got two celerons in a
motherboard...
Couple of things. freebsd-smp is probably the best list.
I have two PPGA(Socket 370) Celeron 333A's that
In some email I received from Nicolai Petri, sie wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Let's join our efforts in this area!
IPFW code is very ugly...
Which is basically due to it being hacked on for years without
Ok...i guess i would be the wrong person for cleaning the code since i
kinda
responsible for the damn thing being a mess in the first place. I can
try:)
I however have some ideas on how to make a better API (as in more hooks
to
userland, which btw now after i have read an FTP requests comment,
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, [iso-8859-1] Markus Döhr wrote:
What do you think about that:
[r...@beta ~]# nmap -vv -p119 -P0 -sT -O betanews.microsoft.com
snip
Sequence numbers: E6E23C4C E7368B4F E6E0CC8D E79B4DEC E7A43C4E E76D208A
Remote operating system guess: Linux 2.1.122 - 2.1.132;
In reply:
Heya, sorry I tried this one on -stable and -questions and noone seems to
know, and they actually go so far as to ask me how I got two celerons in a
motherboard...
so I ask here.
I have two PPGA(Socket 370) Celeron 333A's that are on MSI6905 Dual Socket
1 adaptors...
a Tyan
How do you feel about (after getting it fixed in -CURRENT) helping with
converting ipfw(8) to just a front-end to ipf? I think it's worth discussing
whether it's actually worth it to rewrite IPFW or just work on improving
ipfilter. (discussion moved to -hackers)
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _
In some email I received from Brian Fundakowski Feldman, sie wrote:
How do you feel about (after getting it fixed in -CURRENT) helping with
converting ipfw(8) to just a front-end to ipf? I think it's worth discussing
whether it's actually worth it to rewrite IPFW or just work on improving
I notice that there are paches for Linux to implement VLANS.
Do we support it?
Joe
Joe McGuckin
ViaNet Communications
994 San Antonio Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Phone: 650-969-2203
Cell: 650-207-0372
Fax: 650-969-2124
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Darren Reed wrote:
In some email I received from Brian Fundakowski Feldman, sie wrote:
How do you feel about (after getting it fixed in -CURRENT) helping with
converting ipfw(8) to just a front-end to ipf? I think it's worth discussing
whether it's actually worth it to
On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 08:54:44AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
[[ ... ]]
I've tried twice more to install UnixWare. It makes all the right
noises, but on reboot it just hangs. I'm giving up now.
Maybe you should check out Limux 6.0. I just saw it shrink-wrapped
(RedHat +
On Friday, 18 June 1999 at 20:38:08 -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 08:54:44AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
[[ ... ]]
I've tried twice more to install UnixWare. It makes all the right
noises, but on reboot it just hangs. I'm giving up now.
Maybe you should check
59 matches
Mail list logo
