On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 12:34:36AM -0400, David G. Andersen wrote:
With natd+ipfw, I was setting up a front-end firewall for
a client. The firewall has several real IP addresses
(we'll call them 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2) and two
MS PPTP servers behind it.
10.0.0.1
Title: Intel September Issue
Dear Intel Developer Update Subscriber,
News from last months Intel® Developer Forum Conference continues to emerge. This months issue of IDU gives you a closer look.
Intel® XScale Microarchitecture Serves Up Breakthrough I/O cover story Breakthrough
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
I am wondering whether there is a good reason for not putting FreeBSD in a
DOS extended partition.
Good luck booting it.
Do you mean as long as I can boot it, the kernel itself has no problem
with being putting into a DOS extended partition?
Zhiui Zhang wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
If that were possible, it would be trivial to improve the loader to deal
with that case. The kernel most certainly can mount an extended partition
as root, however.
I know this is a minor subject. But Why Linux can be put
I am debugging a program that does a lot of disk I/O and the system hangs
briefly with the some repeated messages that looks like:
(da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x0 - Timed out in Data-in phase, SEQADDR==0x88
(da0:ahc0:0:0:0): BDR message in message buffer
(da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x0 - Timed out in
Hello,
first off, you should ask in freebsd-questions or freebsd-scsi
second this is a typical scsi problem. To solve:
- check cables
- check termination
and if the problem still exists, check again.
I speak from my own expierence, since I had this kind of problems one
year, cos I didn't see
One of the comments on the side is:
"Caching file system with Soft Update technology".
Sounds vaguely BSD'ish. Maybe even FreeBSD'ish.
Just curious.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
One of the comments on the side is:
"Caching file system with Soft Update technology".
Sounds vaguely BSD'ish. Maybe even FreeBSD'ish.
Last time I looked (a while back) they were using a patched-up FreeBSD
3.x variant.
--
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts
One of the comments on the side is:
"Caching file system with Soft Update technology".
Sounds vaguely BSD'ish. Maybe even FreeBSD'ish.
It is. This product is based on FreeBSD 3.2 if I'm not mistaken.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
* Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000927 16:12] wrote:
One of the comments on the side is:
"Caching file system with Soft Update technology".
Sounds vaguely BSD'ish. Maybe even FreeBSD'ish.
It is. This product is based on FreeBSD 3.2 if I'm not mistaken.
Several other
Several other companies are using FreeBSD for thier all-in-one
fileserver appliances, afaik Quantum as well.
Connexus/FasTraak (http://www.traakan.com) uses large chunks of various
FreeBSD internals- namely the tcp stack. Their own NFS/SFS-journalling
filesystem and driver model.
On Wednesday, 27 September 2000 at 15:31:47 -0700, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
One of the comments on the side is:
"Caching file system with Soft Update technology".
Sounds vaguely BSD'ish. Maybe even FreeBSD'ish.
Just curious.
Maxtor have done a storage box with a modified FreeBSD, including
* Greg Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000927 17:40] wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 September 2000 at 15:31:47 -0700, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
One of the comments on the side is:
"Caching file system with Soft Update technology".
Sounds vaguely BSD'ish. Maybe even FreeBSD'ish.
Just curious.
13 matches
Mail list logo
