M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chuck Tuffli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I'm a newbie to FreeBSD and am wondering if there is a way to pass
: loadable kernel modules parameters. Under Linux, if a module had
: configurable parameters a and b, you can do
Dear All,
As per the subject line, I have been experiencing this for the past two
weeks now.
References:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=222082+0+archive/2002/freebsd-stable/20021027.freebsd-stable
HI net'ers !!
i read some message on the list archive and someone says that we can use
spoofing with ng
how can i do spooging with ng like this ???
WAN --- spoofer ( one ng node ) --- lan
THANX
_
The new MSN 8: advanced
Maxime Henrion wrote:
With kenv(1) you can modify kernel environment variables, which hold the
tunables. Previously, you could only set those at boot time.
Note that there are some values which are used to determine the
size of KVA space allocations, and changing them after boot,
even if it's
I am trying to install free on this machine, as I have no
floppy/cdrom for this box I am restricted to installing via another laptop
then swapping the drive back.
Boot goes fine until:
ata0-master: no status, reselecting device
ata0-master: timeout sending command=ec s=ff e=00
Terry Lambert wrote:
Maxime Henrion wrote:
With kenv(1) you can modify kernel environment variables, which hold the
tunables. Previously, you could only set those at boot time.
Note that there are some values which are used to determine the
size of KVA space allocations, and changing
Maxime Henrion wrote:
The kernel environment is most useful for diagnostic porposes, and
for use in the way descrived in this thread -- to provide a means
of passing parameters that should not be parameters to modules that
should not need parameters in the first place. Many times, hacking
On 6 Nov 2002, Al-Afu wrote:
Dear All,
As per the subject line, I have been experiencing this for the past two
weeks now.
References:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=222082+0+archive/2002/freebsd-stable/20021027.freebsd-stable
..
if ((nd = parse_char_class(++nd)) == NULL) {
..
Hmmm... is this legal ?
http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q3.1.html seems to tell otherwise...
Zlo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
On 06-Nov-2002 Marc Olzheim wrote:
..
if ((nd = parse_char_class(++nd)) == NULL) {
..
Hmmm... is this legal ?
http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q3.1.html seems to tell otherwise...
If it were nd++, yes. However, it is ++nd, thus, the increment
happens first, then the call to
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:46:53PM +0100, Marc Olzheim wrote:
..
if ((nd = parse_char_class(++nd)) == NULL) {
..
Hmmm... is this legal ?
http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q3.1.html seems to tell otherwise...
In this particular case, the value of 'nd' is not *used* anywhere in the
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:54:17AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 06-Nov-2002 Marc Olzheim wrote:
..
if ((nd = parse_char_class(++nd)) == NULL) {
..
Hmmm... is this legal ?
http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q3.1.html seems to tell otherwise...
If it were nd++, yes. However, it
Yes. I am using the fxp driver. Any other possiblities? Or should I take
it easy (and stick to 4.6.2-RELEASE) until such time a fix for the fxp
driver on 4.7-RELEASE is done?
---
dmesg output follows:
---
avail memory = 778977280 (760720K bytes)
Preloaded
If it were nd++, yes. However, it is ++nd, thus, the increment
happens first, then the call to parse_char_class(), then the assignment
to nd.
Ah right, sorry, my mistake...
Zlo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
It's legal, though one would have to know what the author was thinking
(or at least read the surrounding code) before stating that it's also
correct.
It's legal because, unlike the example given in that FAQ entry you
referenced, there's an implicit ordering in the expression that even
the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Al-Afu writes:
Yes. I am using the fxp driver. Any other possiblities? Or should I take
it easy (and stick to 4.6.2-RELEASE) until such time a fix for the fxp
driver on 4.7-RELEASE is done?
I've checked into -stable the fxp driver change that fixes some
random
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
As far as PCI goes (or anything they publish, for that matter), the
MindShare books are very, very good. But for the particular question
of how much physical address space is eaten, you really have to go to
the chipset spec. sheets to get the right
On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 04:01, Bernd Walter wrote:
1T disks and bigger are not supported under -stable.
Perhaps that should be 1TB disks are not supported under stable...I
have a 1TB RAID Array (Qlogic 2200 FC Copper, Chaparrel RAID
Controller)...although I have to admit that losing 200G of it
Marc Olzheim wrote:
..
if ((nd = parse_char_class(++nd)) == NULL) {
..
Hmmm... is this legal ?
http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q3.1.html seems to tell otherwise...
The FAQ entry you reference has nothing to say about this at
all... it has to do with whether the *location* of the lvalue
[snip interesting piece of compiler history]
In any case, your fears are unfounded, for the most part, since
the FAQ entry you are referencing is not analogous to the construct
you are trying to apply it to, anyway, and the FAQ fails to deal
with many of these portability issues, too, since
Nate Lawson wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
As far as PCI goes (or anything they publish, for that matter), the
MindShare books are very, very good. But for the particular question
of how much physical address space is eaten, you really have to go to
the chipset spec.
=
The Ultimate Bulk Email Solution Has Finally Arrived!
=
If you have a product, service, information or a message you would like
to get out to millions of potential buyers, then
Whoops, hit the 'send' too fast...
With some minor modifications to disklabel, you can label a 2 Tb disk.
We've done it with a 1.4Tb disk:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/da20a 669G 246G 370G40%/rapraid0
/dev/da20e
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:05:38PM +0300, Anton Vinokurov wrote:
Hi!
I am running FreeBSD 4.7-release and try to use ATEN UC10T USB-to-Ethernet
adapter. Unfortunately it causes my system to print something like:
kue0: watchdog timeout
kue0: usb error on tx: TIMEOUT
following by freeze. I
Marc Olzheim wrote:
In any case, your fears are unfounded, for the most part, since
the FAQ entry you are referencing is not analogous to the construct
you are trying to apply it to, anyway, and the FAQ fails to deal
with many of these portability issues, too, since it assumes that
the
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Marc Olzheim wrote:
With some minor modifications to disklabel, you can label a 2 Tb disk.
We've done it with a 1.4Tb disk:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/da20a 669G 246G 370G40%/rapraid0
26 matches
Mail list logo
