I have updated the patchset-9 of unionfs.
Patchset-9:
For 7-current
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p9.diff
For 6.x
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p9.diff
Changes in unionfs-p9.diff
- Now you can use unionfs with nullfs. To fix the
I have updated the patchset-9 of unionfs.
Patchset-9:
For 7-current
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p9.diff
For 6.x
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p9.diff
Changes in unionfs-p9.diff
- Now you can use unionfs with nullfs. To fix the
It's been over a week, and I wonder, is this even the correct mailing list
for this question, or is it just that no one has an answer to it?
Naram Qashat
(Ignore the note in the previous message, I subscribed afterwards.)
- Original Message -
From: Naram Qashat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 19:53, Rick C. Petty wrote:
Hello. I cvsup'd to 6.1-PRERELEASE today (Mar 14 2006), installed world,
and tried booting the GENERIC kernel. My machine hangs after the following
messages:
pmtimer0 on isa0
orm0: ISA Option ROM at iomem 0xd-0xd3 on isa0
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 10:46:01AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
I'm using a USB keyboard, no PS/2. I've tried the hint to disable kbdmux,
I've tried with and without selecting the Boot w/ USB keyboard and the
machine locks up in the same spot no matter what I try. The same hardware
boots
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:11, Rick C. Petty wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 10:46:01AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
I'm using a USB keyboard, no PS/2. I've tried the hint to disable kbdmux,
I've tried with and without selecting the Boot w/ USB keyboard and the
machine locks up in the
Hi;
This was posted recently to the OpenSolaris lists, and I thought it might be
interesting for us too:
__
Port of libumem on Sourceforge
Posted: Mar 9, 2006 7:22 PM
Hello,
We've ported libumem to run on Linux and Windows (with work in progress
for *BSDish systems) as part
Naram Qashat wrote this message on Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:17 -0500:
It's been over a week, and I wonder, is this even the correct mailing list
for this question, or is it just that no one has an answer to it?
You can check on freebsd-usb, as that is where people who are interested
in USB
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:27:08PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:11, Rick C. Petty wrote:
My BIOS (Asus A8N-E rev 1010) has no option for disabling USB keyboard
support, but I can either disable the USB controller or disable the USB
legacy support. I doubt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this message on Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 18:35 +0100:
This was posted recently to the OpenSolaris lists, and I thought it might be
interesting for us too:
__
Port of libumem on Sourceforge
Posted: Mar 9, 2006 7:22 PM
Hello,
We've ported libumem
Rick C. Petty wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:27:08PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:11, Rick C. Petty wrote:
My BIOS (Asus A8N-E rev 1010) has no option for disabling USB keyboard
support, but I can either disable the USB controller or disable the USB
legacy
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
That's why I started work on rewriting a allocated based upon the
paper so that it'd have a BSD license... I haven't worked on it much,
and now that jemalloc is here, who knows...
Are you referring to the 2001 Usenix paper by Bonwick and Adams? That
paper is a very
--- John-Mark Gurney [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
...
It's definately interesting, but doubtful will ever be imported to
replace libc's malloc for one reason.. the CDDL is effectively the
GPL:
...
It's nevertheless less viral. I don't want libumem in the base distribution
though... it
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:11, Rick C. Petty wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 10:46:01AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
I'm using a USB keyboard, no PS/2. I've tried the hint to disable kbdmux,
I've tried with and without selecting the Boot w/ USB keyboard and the
machine
Mars G. Miro wrote:
Daichi-san,
I have updated the patchset-9 of unionfs.
We've been using an in-house LiveCD toolkit that uses unionfs (where
cd9660 is the lower layer) and all I can say is that these patches are
very important, at least on = 6.X, otherwise things would just not
work. I
Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
Daichi GOTO wrote:
All folks have interests in improved unionfs should keep attentions
and ask how about merge? at every turn :)
OK. How about a merge?
I'd really like to see this in 6-STABLE.
Me too, but unfortunately it is difficult with some reasons
(detail
About six months ago, there was a lot of press publicity given to a
port of Sun's DTrace code to FreeBSD. Does anyone know what (if
anything) is happening to this? Google doesn't turn up anything more
recent and I don't recall reading anything on the mailing lists.
--
Peter Jeremy
17 matches
Mail list logo
