Heavy system load by pagedaemon

2006-05-10 Thread Iasen Kostov
Hello I (probably) have some problem with a hosting server machine halting about once a 30 to minute (probably when the free memory falls under some threshold). At that moment the machine totaly halts for about 5 sec then resumes normal work with load average around 9-15 (depends on system

Re: Heavy system load by pagedaemon

2006-05-10 Thread Iasen Kostov
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:28 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: Hello I (probably) have some problem with a hosting server machine halting about once a 30 to minute (probably when the free memory falls under some threshold). At that moment the machine totaly halts for about 5 sec then resumes

Re: Heavy system load by pagedaemon

2006-05-10 Thread Iasen Kostov
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:32 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:28 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: Hello I (probably) have some problem with a hosting server machine halting about once a 30 to minute (probably when the free memory falls under some threshold). At that moment

Re: Heavy system load by pagedaemon

2006-05-10 Thread Vasil Dimov
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:43:58PM +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:32 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:28 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: Hello I (probably) have some problem with a hosting server machine halting about once a 30 to minute (probably

Re: Heavy system load by pagedaemon

2006-05-10 Thread Iasen Kostov
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 16:15 +0300, Vasil Dimov wrote: On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:43:58PM +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:32 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:28 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: Hello I (probably) have some problem with a

Xnu, and 'L4BSD'

2006-05-10 Thread R. Tyler Ballance
All this recent microkernel talk has finally hit another mailing list i'm on ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) regarding a possible L4BSD (https:// lists.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de/pipermail/l4ka/2006-May/001603.html) and this has brought up an interesting question for me. L4Linux exists, but it seems to be

IPFW + NATD

2006-05-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am still having huge troubles with using natd with the divert natd = in ipfw. I can only nat all my traffic or none. What i would = like to do is simply nat accoring to box or service for a particular bo= x. This is a example of what works for natting all traffic. = BRipfw

Re: IPFW + NATD

2006-05-10 Thread Gergely CZUCZY
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:26:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am still having huge troubles with using natd with the divert natd = in ipfw. I can only nat all my traffic or none. What i would = like to do is simply nat accoring to box or service for a particular bo= x.

Re: IPFW + NATD

2006-05-10 Thread David S. Madole
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now i =ave tried the likes of ipfw add divert natd all from 10.150.200.= 35 to 196.25.211.150 via tun0 And that does not work. Ive tried many examples. And cannot come right That is fine, but you need to make sure the packets for both directions of the

Re: Heavy system load by pagedaemon

2006-05-10 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (May 10), Iasen Kostov said: On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:32 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:28 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: I (probably) have some problem with a hosting server machine halting about once a 30 to minute (probably when the free memory

Re: Heavy system load by pagedaemon

2006-05-10 Thread Iasen Kostov
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 11:18 -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (May 10), Iasen Kostov said: On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:32 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:28 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: I (probably) have some problem with a hosting server machine halting

Re: Heavy system load by pagedaemon

2006-05-10 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (May 10), Iasen Kostov said: On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 11:18 -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (May 10), Iasen Kostov said: On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:32 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:28 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: I (probably) have some

Re: Exiting Xorg panics Core Duo laptop

2006-05-10 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 16:34, Eric Anderson wrote: I have a Core Duo system (2 2GHz CPUs), that continually locks up (I believe it panics) when exiting xorg with both CPU's enabled. If I have: hint.apic.0.disabled=1 in device.hints, I only use one CPU, however it exits from xorg just

Re: Atomic updates of NFS export lists

2006-05-10 Thread Scott Long
Andrey Simonenko wrote: Greetings, In my environment non-atomic updates of NFS export lists are not acceptable. So, I decided to correct this problem. As the result mountd, kern/vfs_export.c were completely rewritten, mount.h, vfs_mount.c and nfs_srvsubs.c also got changes. For details see

RFC: Minor changes to uart(4)'s ns8250/ns16550 support.

2006-05-10 Thread Benno Rice
I've made a couple of changes to uart(4)'s support for ns8250/ns16550-alikes to support some work I'm doing on porting FreeBSD to Intel's XScale PXA255. The changes are: - Stop using uart_{get,set}dreg to handle the DL register. The DL register is 16 bits wide, but when the register offset

RFC: Optionally verbose SYSINIT

2006-05-10 Thread Benno Rice
One of the things that I found useful both in starting the PowerPC port and in doing the XScale stuff I'm working on is making the SYSINIT stuff done by mi_startup() verbose. This generally requires hacking your own code into mi_startup() to print out which SYSINIT you're up to and the like.