On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Wesley Shields wrote:
Here's an updated patch to sys/amd64/amd64/db_trace.c (it's a diff against
revision 1.81). It changes register rbp to be register_t rbp and fixes
the extra W in TD_IS_SWAPPED. The kernel built fine after these changes.
I'll test it out tomorrow.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Skip Ford wrote:
- -a now means all processes,
Thanks. :-) I'm a little surprised. You seemed pretty dedicated to a
per-process tool.
I was, but then I read your e-mail and became convinced that the first patch
that would be submitted against procstat(1) would be a
Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Skip Ford wrote:
- -a now means all processes,
Thanks. :-) I'm a little surprised. You seemed pretty dedicated to a
per-process tool.
I was, but then I read your e-mail and became convinced that the first
patch that would be submitted against
Skip Ford wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Skip Ford wrote:
- -a now means all processes,
Thanks. :-) I'm a little surprised. You seemed pretty dedicated to a
per-process tool.
I was, but then I read your e-mail and became convinced that the first
patch that would be
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Skip Ford wrote:
Skip Ford wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Skip Ford wrote:
- -a now means all processes,
Thanks. :-) I'm a little surprised. You seemed pretty dedicated to a
per-process tool.
I was, but then I read your e-mail and became
the 2 most common cause for sendto() failure on raw sockets are:
- badly initialized IP header. note that ip_len and ip_off must be in
host byte order. all other fields must be in net byte order.
- badly initialized destination address.
writing a raw socket server is not much different than
Well, I hope I haven't missed anything important, but I guess
that's about it.
Wow ! seems like you spent a fair time assembling that lot,
it'd sure be a shame if it just got dusty in mail archives,
(OK apart from current readers who might latch it).
Maybe you could send it to [EMAIL
On 2007-11-27 21:27, Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to read about 4 tons of some really sparse pdf specs. I also
have a rather inconvenient throwback: I feel hugely more at
home-reading documents in paper. What I'd kind of like to do would
be able to perform cut'n'paste among
In response to Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2007-11-27 21:27, Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to read about 4 tons of some really sparse pdf specs. I also
have a rather inconvenient throwback: I feel hugely more at
home-reading documents in paper. What I'd kind of
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 05:13:28PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Well, I hope I haven't missed anything important, but I guess
that's about it.
Wow ! seems like you spent a fair time assembling that lot,
About 2 hours.
it'd sure be a shame if it just got dusty in mail archives,
(OK
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 05:13:28PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Well, I hope I haven't missed anything important, but I guess
that's about it.
Wow ! seems like you spent a fair time assembling that lot,
About 2 hours.
it'd sure be a shame if it
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 05:13:28PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Well, I hope I haven't missed anything important, but I guess
that's about it.
Wow ! seems like you spent a fair time assembling that lot,
About 2 hours.
it'd sure be a shame if it just got dusty in
On Nov 28, 2007, at 5:46 AM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Skip Ford wrote:
Skip Ford wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Skip Ford wrote:
- -a now means all processes,
Thanks. :-) I'm a little surprised. You seemed pretty
dedicated to a per-process tool.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:05:18 -0500
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2007-11-27 21:27, Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to read about 4 tons of some really sparse pdf specs. I also
have a rather inconvenient
Quoting Stefan Sperling [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:06:18 +0100):
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 05:13:28PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Well, I hope I haven't missed anything important, but I guess
that's about it.
Wow ! seems like you spent a fair time assembling that lot,
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Bert JW Regeer wrote:
Have the licensing issues been resolved with regards to DTrace? This is a
feature I was looking forward to in 7.0-RELEASE but it had been delayed
because of the licensing.
The problems had to do with non-alignment of the licensing vs. software
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:57:57PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Maybe we should add a wiki page about wake on lan?
Reading http://wiki.freebsd.org/AboutWiki it seems that if
I created an account there and someone added me to the
ContributorsGroup for a new WakeOnLan page I would be
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:24:55AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday 18 November 2007 05:43:45 pm Juergen Lock wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 03:05:33AM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
Ok I finally have an amd64 smp box here that i can play with, and tried
to reproduce
I tried to compile firefox-2.0.0.10 on 7.0-BETA3.
And one linking command failed seeking for malloc_lock symbol required by
/lib/pthread.so.2. Obviously it tried to link obsolete /lib/pthread.so.2 with
the new /lib/libc.so.7.
By reading /usr/src/UPDATING I learn that the default threading library
Yuri wrote:
I tried to compile firefox-2.0.0.10 on 7.0-BETA3.
And one linking command failed seeking for malloc_lock symbol required by
/lib/pthread.so.2. Obviously it tried to link obsolete /lib/pthread.so.2 with
the new /lib/libc.so.7.
By reading /usr/src/UPDATING I learn that the default
Sorry about that.
Please find the logs below.
My system is upgraded from 6.3. And /lib/libpthread.so.2 is not a symlink.
But when I make it a symlink (ln -s /lib/libthr.so.3 /lib/libpthread.so.2)
I get another error, see log below.
Some requisite libs are compiled with /lib/libpthread.so.2 (?)
Yuri wrote:
Sorry about that.
Please find the logs below.
My system is upgraded from 6.3. And /lib/libpthread.so.2 is not a symlink.
But when I make it a symlink (ln -s /lib/libthr.so.3 /lib/libpthread.so.2)
I get another error, see log below.
Some requisite libs are compiled with
On Thu, November 29, 2007 12:01 am, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:57:57PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Maybe we should add a wiki page about wake on lan?
Reading http://wiki.freebsd.org/AboutWiki it seems that if
I created an account there and someone added me to
23 matches
Mail list logo
