On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:14:49 -0700
Bert JW Regeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 4, 2008, at 14:52 , Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
On Mon, 04.02.2008 at 13:00:40 -0700, Bert JW Regeer wrote:
On Feb 4, 2008, at 08:03 , John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday 02 February 2008 06:40:15 pm Aryeh M.
Hi All,
On Feb 5, 2008 10:25 AM, Ariff Abdullah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:14:49 -0700
Bert JW Regeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 4, 2008, at 14:52 , Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
On Mon, 04.02.2008 at 13:00:40 -0700, Bert JW Regeer wrote:
On Feb 4, 2008, at 08:03
on 04/02/2008 22:07 Pav Lucistnik said the following:
Julian Elischer píše v po 04. 02. 2008 v 10:36 -0800:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
More on the problem with reading big directories on UDF.
You do realise that you have now made yourself the official
maintainer of the UDF file system by submitting
on 04/02/2008 20:36 Julian Elischer said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
More on the problem with reading big directories on UDF.
You do realise that you have now made yourself the official
maintainer of the UDF file system by submitting a competent
and insightful analysis of the
Andriy Gapon píše v út 05. 02. 2008 v 16:40 +0200:
Yay, and can you fix the sequential read performance while you're at it?
Kthx!
this was almost trivial :-)
See the attached patch, first hunk is just for consistency.
The code was borrowed from cd9660, only field/variable names are
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 04/02/2008 22:07 Pav Lucistnik said the following:
Julian Elischer píše v po 04. 02. 2008 v 10:36 -0800:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
More on the problem with reading big directories on UDF.
You do realise that you have now made yourself the official
maintainer of the UDF file
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 04/02/2008 22:07 Pav Lucistnik said the following:
Julian Elischer píše v po 04. 02. 2008 v 10:36 -0800:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
More on the problem with reading big directories on UDF.
You do realise that you have now made yourself the official
maintainer of the UDF file
7 matches
Mail list logo