On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 04:00:13PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
If we're comparing who has bigger... :)
beast:root:~# zpool list
NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
tank732G604G128G82% ONLINE
Ulf Lilleengen wrote:
Hello,
As a followup to my previous patch on csup, I've tried to do some fixes to
RCS-files. However, instead of doing major workarounds in csup to handle
files which does not behave correctly to RCS, I implemented MD5 check of RCS
content. This means that the MD5 sum from
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 04:00:13PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
At the risk of sounding repetitive, can you try a simple test on your
ZFS pools, to see if you can panic the kernel? Do this:
* install blogbench and bonnie++ from ports/benchmarks
* run:
blogbench
On lør, jun 07, 2008 at 10:18:05am +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Ulf Lilleengen wrote:
Hello,
As a followup to my previous patch on csup, I've tried to do some fixes to
RCS-files. However, instead of doing major workarounds in csup to handle
files which does not behave correctly to RCS,
On 2008.06.07 06:18:55 +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:41:35PM +0200, Patrick Lamaizi?re wrote:
- How check the encryption/decryption ?
Openssl seems ok, i've got quite the same results as NetBSD on a Soekris
net5501 box. But i must use -engine cryptodev, why
On 2008.06.06 19:02:36 +0200, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
Dear All,
Are there any reason to not enabling zlib compression for TLS in
openssl
on FreeBSD ?
No, that seems like a mistake. Which FreeBSD version are you using,
and are you using OpenSSL from base or ports?
Would it break ABI if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I can't seem to find how many /dev/usbN bus devices there can be. I'm writing
some code that scans them all looking for anything that has my device, but I
while I know to start at usb0, just how high do I go? There seem to be 128
device minors, is
Hi Mathieu,
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 04:52:04PM +0200, Mathieu Prevot wrote:
I would like to know the bitrate of a pool of child processes that use
a network connection, how can I have something like netstat -w1
provide but at the process level ?
One way to do it is to create a dynamic library
You can download a patch from
http://www.cs.rice.edu/~alc/amd64_kvm_6GB.patch that increases amd64's
kernel virtual address space to 6GB. This patch also increases the
default for the kmem map to almost 2GB. I believe that kernel loadable
modules still work. However, I suspect that
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can download a patch from
http://www.cs.rice.edu/~alc/amd64_kvm_6GB.patch that increases amd64's
kernel virtual address space to 6GB. This patch also increases the default
for the kmem map to almost 2GB. I believe that
Hello,
I've written a FreeBSD driver for Conexant CX2388x-based PCI TV capture cards.
Of course the driver uses busdma to be as machine-independent as possible.
One problem I've encountered is that bus_dmamem_alloc is inadequate for my
needs. The CX2388x only understands 32-bit physical
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 06:59:35PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
You can download a patch from
http://www.cs.rice.edu/~alc/amd64_kvm_6GB.patch that increases amd64's
kernel virtual address space to 6GB. This patch also increases the
default for the kmem map to almost 2GB.
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:39:43AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 06:59:35PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
You can download a patch from
http://www.cs.rice.edu/~alc/amd64_kvm_6GB.patch that increases amd64's
kernel virtual address space to 6GB. This
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 06:59:35PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
You can download a patch from
http://www.cs.rice.edu/~alc/amd64_kvm_6GB.patch that increases amd64's
kernel virtual address space to 6GB. This patch also increases the
default for the kmem map to almost 2GB. I believe that kernel
14 matches
Mail list logo
