Re: Increasing KVM on amd64

2008-06-08 Thread Alan Cox
Tz-Huan Huang wrote: On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can download a patch from http://www.cs.rice.edu/~alc/amd64_kvm_6GB.patch that increases amd64's kernel virtual address space to 6GB. This patch also increases the default for the kmem map to almost

Re: Increasing KVM on amd64

2008-06-08 Thread Tz-Huan Huang
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tz-Huan Huang wrote: On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can download a patch from http://www.cs.rice.edu/~alc/amd64_kvm_6GB.patch that increases amd64's kernel virtual address space to 6GB.

ntpd jail problem

2008-06-08 Thread xorquewasp
Anybody know why ntpd might not work in a jail? I'm running an openntpd instance on the host machine, which syncs the clock from the pool at pool.ntp.org. From the log output, ntpd claims to be synced and the time does seem to be correct. I'm then running another openntpd in a jail which doesn't

timestamping for kernel messages (like Solaris and Linux)

2008-06-08 Thread Niki Denev
Hi, Has anyone thought about implementing an option to prepend all kernel console messages with timestamps, like Linux and Solaris do? Is it just a matter of hacking up the kernel printf() implementation? Any possible caveats? Regards, Niki ___

Re: ntpd jail problem

2008-06-08 Thread xorquewasp
On 20080608 12:19:23, Steven Hartland wrote: I assume as it would effect the entire machine and hence should be run on the base machine instead, not the jail? I think you might've misunderstood. The ntpd I'm running on the host syncs the clock (and therefore the whole machine), the ntpd

Re: ntpd jail problem

2008-06-08 Thread Steven Hartland
I assume as it would effect the entire machine and hence should be run on the base machine instead, not the jail? - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anybody know why ntpd might not work in a jail? This e.mail is private

Re: AMD Geode LX crypto accelerator (glxsb)

2008-06-08 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Sat, 7 Jun 2008 06:18:55 +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Well, it seems to work but i've got few problems to test the module : - How check the encryption/decryption ? Openssl seems ok, i've got quite the same results as NetBSD on a Soekris net5501 box.

Re: timestamping for kernel messages (like Solaris and Linux)

2008-06-08 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2008-Jun-08 10:24:53 +0300, Niki Denev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone thought about implementing an option to prepend all kernel console messages with timestamps, like Linux and Solaris do? The only time I've seen Solaris do this is when the console message is syslog'd - which FreeBSD

Re: ntpd jail problem

2008-06-08 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2008-Jun-08 11:32:54 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running an openntpd instance on the host machine, which syncs the clock from the pool at pool.ntp.org. From the log output, ntpd claims to be synced and the time does seem to be correct. I'm then running another openntpd in a jail which

Re: timestamping for kernel messages (like Solaris and Linux)

2008-06-08 Thread Niki Denev
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2008-Jun-08 10:24:53 +0300, Niki Denev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone thought about implementing an option to prepend all kernel console messages with timestamps, like Linux and Solaris do? The only time I've seen

Re: ntpd jail problem

2008-06-08 Thread xorquewasp
On 20080608 19:56:03, Eugene Grosbein wrote: On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:25:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is that the ntpd in the jail seems to believe that the host clock is out of sync (from what I can gather), even though it isn't. That's because ntpd won't blindly

Re: ntpd jail problem

2008-06-08 Thread xorquewasp
On 20080608 22:10:27, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2008-Jun-08 11:32:54 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running an openntpd instance on the host machine, which syncs the clock from the pool at pool.ntp.org. From the log output, ntpd claims to be synced and the time does seem to be correct

Re: ntpd jail problem

2008-06-08 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:25:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is that the ntpd in the jail seems to believe that the host clock is out of sync (from what I can gather), even though it isn't. That's because ntpd won't blindly assume that your host has right time. If you make

Re: number of /dev/usb nodes

2008-06-08 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:18:41PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I can't seem to find how many /dev/usbN bus devices there can be. I'm writing some code that scans them all looking for anything that has my device, but I while I know to start at

Re: number of /dev/usb nodes

2008-06-08 Thread Chuck Robey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernd Walter wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:18:41PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I can't seem to find how many /dev/usbN bus devices there can be. I'm writing some code that scans them all looking

Re: Kerberized CIFS client?

2008-06-08 Thread Atte Peltomäki
smbclient (and other samba utilities) do not refer to krb5.conf when figuring out the kerberos realm. you will have to put to your krb5.conf on both client and server: [domain_realms] cifs.example.com = realm.example.com Otherwise it will just try to use example.com as the realm. On

Re: number of /dev/usb nodes

2008-06-08 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:16:26AM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernd Walter wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:18:41PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I can't seem to find how many /dev/usbN bus

Re: number of /dev/usb nodes

2008-06-08 Thread Chuck Robey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernd Walter wrote: On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:16:26AM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernd Walter wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:18:41PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Re: AMD Geode LX crypto accelerator (glxsb)

2008-06-08 Thread Patrick Lamaizière
Le Sun, 8 Jun 2008 13:58:46 +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Thanks. I think it is ok for a review and test, i added the RNG stuff since the last time and a manual page 'glxsb.4' http://user.lamaiziere.net/patrick/glxsb.c http://user.lamaiziere.net/patrick/glxsb.tar.gz

Re: AMD Geode LX crypto accelerator (glxsb)

2008-06-08 Thread Patrick Lamaizière
Le Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:26:49 +0200, Patrick Lamaizière [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : http://user.lamaiziere.net/patrick/glxsb.c http://user.lamaiziere.net/patrick/glxsb.tar.gz (all the module) All my apologies : this is not the good version :-( I've made a 'tar xzf' instead a 'tar czf' and i've

Re: Debugging rtld

2008-06-08 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi Kostik, hackers, On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 08:46:37PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 07:35:25PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: Hi, On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 01:26:53PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:17:40AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:

Re: Impact of having a large number of open file descriptors

2008-06-08 Thread Ivan Voras
Ivan Voras wrote: Hi, Im thinking again of the old idea of implementing poor man's file replication system using kqueue to monitor changes on files. I made something with the idea, available here: http://ivoras.sharanet.org/stuff/adfs.tgz It was hacked up over the weekend and probably