* Paul Schenkeveld fb-hack...@psconsult.nl wrote:
Or change 'pts' to, for example, 'pt' so without changing utmp and
related stuff we'll have space for a four digit pty number.
I've noticed lots of apps already misbehave because of the pty(4) -
pts(4) migration. I guess using a new naming
Hi Alex,
* Wilkinson, Alex alex.wilkin...@dsto.defence.gov.au wrote:
0n Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:53:06PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
You can increase the maximum amount of PTYs by editing a lot of source
files on your system. There is some good news: in -CURRENT we switched
El día Friday, March 27, 2009 a las 05:52:40PM +0100, Paul B. Mahol escribió:
On 3/27/09, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
Hello,
When I boot my EeePC from USB key (/dev/da0s1a) -CURRENT it sees the two SSD
only
as
$ ls -l /dev/ad*
/dev/ad2
/dev/ad2s1
/dev/ad2s1a
Ed Maste wrote:
2009/3/24 Vladimir Ermakov samflan...@gmail.com:
Hello, All
Describe my problem:
have volume RAID-10 (SAS-HDD x 6) on Adaptec RAID 5805
2 HHD of 6 have errors in smart data (damaged)
i am try read file /var/db/mysql/ibdata1 from this volume
system does not respond ( lost
I have some vague thoughts on using SW_WATCHDOG and a hardware watchdog
together.
I think this could be useful but I am not sure how to implement this.
The idea is this: timeout for SW_WATCHDOG is smaller than timeout for hw wd;
when
some freeze happens sw wd logic kicks in first, stops hw wd
Hello hackers,
Is there a way to set the mss for a socket ? Like you can do in linux with
setsockopt(TCP_MAXSEG) ?
So i can set the maximum size of packets (or sort of) from a simple userland
program.
I've read the code and i cannot find by myself (at least from a 30minute
reading) a
--- On Thu, 4/2/09, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
I have some vague thoughts on using SW_WATCHDOG and a
hardware watchdog together.
I think this could be useful but I am not sure how to
implement this.
The idea is this: timeout for SW_WATCHDOG is smaller than
timeout for hw wd;
Luiz Otavio O Souza escreveu:
Hello hackers,
Is there a way to set the mss for a socket ? Like you can do in linux
with setsockopt(TCP_MAXSEG) ?
So i can set the maximum size of packets (or sort of) from a simple
userland program.
I've read the code and i cannot find by myself (at least
On 4/2/09, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
El día Friday, March 27, 2009 a las 05:52:40PM +0100, Paul B. Mahol
escribió:
On 3/27/09, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
Hello,
When I boot my EeePC from USB key (/dev/da0s1a) -CURRENT it sees the two
SSD
only
as
$ ls
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org wrote:
We are certainly not uninterested in projects along these lines, but I think
the trick will be creating a convincing proposal that argues that (a) you
can do the work in a summer, (b) there's a compelling usage case for
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Gabriele Modena wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org wrote:
We are certainly not uninterested in projects along these lines, but I
think the trick will be creating a convincing proposal that argues that (a)
you can do the work in a
Apr 2, 2009 01:03:48 AM, [1]peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrot= e:
On 2009-Mar-30 18:45:30 -0700, Maxim Sobolev [2]sobo...@freebsd.org
wrote:
You don't really need to = do it on every execve() unconditionally.
It
could be done on de= mand in libc, so that only when thread pass
Hey Sergey, whatever you are using for a mail client SUCKS
real bad at the moment..
it's really messing up your outgoing mails..
note the mail below
Sergey Babkin wrote:
Apr 2, 2009 01:03:48 AM, [1]peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrot= :
On 2009-Mar-30 18:45:30 -0700, Maxim Sobolev
0n Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:53:06PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
You can increase the maximum amount of PTYs by editing a lot of source
files on your system. There is some good news: in -CURRENT we switched
to Unix98-style PTYs (/dev/pts/%u). Right now the maximum amount of PTYs
is limited to 1000
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 1:55:12 pm Steven Hartland wrote:
How can I increase the maximum number or ptys available on FreeBSD 7.0?
It seems that currently the machine is maxing out at 512 but there is
still loads of capacity left on the machine.
Ideally would like to double at least the
Yep that's what I came up with after looking though the code thanks
for the link though, always good to get confirmation that I didn't
miss something.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 1:55:12 pm Steven Hartland
Andriy Gapon writes:
| I have some vague thoughts on using SW_WATCHDOG and a hardware watchdog
| together.
| I think this could be useful but I am not sure how to implement this.
| The idea is this: timeout for SW_WATCHDOG is smaller than timeout for hw
| wd; when some freeze happens sw wd logic
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Luiz Otavio O Souza escreveu:
Hello hackers,
Is there a way to set the mss for a socket ? Like you can do in linux
with setsockopt(TCP_MAXSEG) ?
So i can set the maximum size of packets (or sort of) from a simple
userland program.
you mean sysctl -w
18 matches
Mail list logo
