On 22 Sep 2009, at 19:03, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
My comment is to just use 4.x (seriously). A true 386 is going to
be quite
slow and the overhead of many things added that work well on newer
processors
is going to be very painful on a 386 (probably
Rui Paulo wrote:
On 22 Sep 2009, at 19:03, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
My comment is to just use 4.x (seriously). A true 386 is going to
be quite
slow and the overhead of many things added that work well on newer
processors
is going to be
On 23 Sep 2009, at 16:54, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
4.11 fell out of security support some while back, but
http://www.freebsd.org/security/index.html
only lists what's still in, not what fell out when.
Right, but IIRC there were some folks patch 4-STABLE after the
security officer
On Wednesday 23 September 2009 11:54:34 am Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Rui Paulo wrote:
On 22 Sep 2009, at 19:03, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
My comment is to just use 4.x (seriously). A true 386 is going to
be quite
slow and the overhead of
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 23 September 2009 11:54:34 am Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Rui Paulo wrote:
On 22 Sep 2009, at 19:03, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
My comment is to just use 4.x (seriously). A true 386 is going to
be quite
slow and the overhead
On Wednesday 23 September 2009 1:21:59 pm Julian Elischer wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 23 September 2009 11:54:34 am Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Rui Paulo wrote:
On 22 Sep 2009, at 19:03, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
My comment is to just use
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 23 September 2009 1:21:59 pm Julian Elischer wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
Other things added since then assume at least a 486. Not having cmpxchg is a
bit of a killer.
I think a 386 can assume non-SMP in which case that can be simulated
Hi,
Sorry for the cross post but i didn't get any bites on arm@ so I am
gonna try my luck here.
I am trying to add support for the Intel SS4000-E/EM7210 to FreeBSD, I
have copied all of the files for the EP80219 as this seems to be what
the board is based on, and modified the interrupt
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 05:54:34PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
4.11 fell out of security support some while back, but
http://www.freebsd.org/security/index.html
only lists what's still in, not what fell out when.
Then see http://people.freebsd.org/~linimon/schedule/milestones.html.
Hi,
I have been working on getting at least some support for the Function
(F1-12) keys on my MS Natural 4000 keyboard. Here is the original PR on
the subject: usb/116947. My patch can be found here:
http://svn.tomjudge.com/freebsd/patches/ms-natural-4000/usb-natural4000.patch
and I have
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:44:54 +
Tom Judge t...@tomjudge.com wrote:
Hi,
I have been working on getting at least some support for the Function
(F1-12) keys on my MS Natural 4000 keyboard. Here is the original PR
on the subject: usb/116947. My patch can be found here:
11 matches
Mail list logo
