В Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:53:31 +0200
Jack Engqvist Johansson j...@skysel.com пишет:
Hi,
I just got succeeded with my compilation of a custom kernel for
FreeBSD 8.1. But when I'm trying to install it, I got an error.
File system is full!
So I moved the old kernel to another partition, but
On Mon Oct 18 10, Matthew Jacob wrote:
What problem are you solving by this change?
code cleanup.
the scsi delay value currently defaults to 2000ms. however that doesn't make
sense, since on almost all platforms it gets set to 5000ms in the default
config. what's the purpose of having a
В Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:53:34 +0200
Jack Engqvist Johansson j...@skysel.com пишет:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net wrote:
В Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:53:31 +0200
Jack Engqvist Johansson j...@skysel.com пишет:
Hi,
I just got succeeded with my compilation of a
It would be an effective behavioral change for those of us who remove
that line.
Personally, I think 5 seconds is too long- even 2 seconds is more than
adequate even for moderately old 'other' hardware like scanners.
For -current, why don't you simply remove all of the config lines and
leave
В Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:58:35 +0200
Jack Engqvist Johansson j...@skysel.com пишет:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net wrote:
В Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:53:34 +0200
Jack Engqvist Johansson j...@skysel.com пишет:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Ivan Klymenko
On Tue Oct 19 10, Matthew Jacob wrote:
It would be an effective behavioral change for those of us who remove
that line.
Personally, I think 5 seconds is too long- even 2 seconds is more than
adequate even for moderately old 'other' hardware like scanners.
For -current, why don't you
I'd go for the gusto in -current, but it's ok to be conservative too.
On Tue Oct 19 10, Matthew Jacob wrote:
It would be an effective behavioral change for those of us who remove
that line.
Personally, I think 5 seconds is too long- even 2 seconds is more than
adequate even for moderately
On Tuesday, October 19, 2010 10:31:10 am Alexander Best wrote:
On Tue Oct 19 10, Matthew Jacob wrote:
It would be an effective behavioral change for those of us who remove
that line.
Personally, I think 5 seconds is too long- even 2 seconds is more than
adequate even for moderately old
On Tue Oct 19 10, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, October 19, 2010 10:31:10 am Alexander Best wrote:
On Tue Oct 19 10, Matthew Jacob wrote:
It would be an effective behavioral change for those of us who remove
that line.
Personally, I think 5 seconds is too long- even 2 seconds is
On Tuesday, October 19, 2010 3:14:46 pm Alexander Best wrote:
On Tue Oct 19 10, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, October 19, 2010 10:31:10 am Alexander Best wrote:
On Tue Oct 19 10, Matthew Jacob wrote:
It would be an effective behavioral change for those of us who remove
that line.
В Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:31:55 +0200
Jack Engqvist Johansson j...@skysel.com пишет:
bsd# du -chd0 /root
457M /root
457M total
!!
do not use the Root account to work in the system!
!!
Create another account for this...
go to this directory (/root) and delete the files that
В Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:28:10 +0300
Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net пишет:
В Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:31:55 +0200
Jack Engqvist Johansson j...@skysel.com пишет:
bsd# du -chd0 /root
457M /root
457M total
!!
do not use the Root account to work in the system!
!!
Create
Hello.
What's the current status of DRI/3D support with the 4xxx range of ATI
cards?
I'm on 8.0-RELEASE and have just installed a (borrowed) 4870 card. I
get working dual monitor support but only software rasterization in
xorg.
The intention is to replace a broken x1950 card with something at
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net wrote:
В Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:28:10 +0300
Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net пишет:
В Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:31:55 +0200
Jack Engqvist Johansson j...@skysel.com пишет:
bsd# du -chd0 /root
457M /root
457M total
!!
do
hi there,
i stumbled upon this note in the BUGS section of the cd(4) manual:
There is no mechanism currently to set different minimum and maximum
timeouts for different CD changers; the timeout values set by the kernel
options or the sysctl variables apply to all LUN-based CD
also at some locations in the code SCSI_DELAY is being set to 15000. i believe
this is the case when certain drivers (cam, ahb, aha) get loaded as a kernel
module, but i'm not sure. it looks like this:
.if !defined(KERNBUILDDIR)
opt_scsi.h:
echo #define SCSI_DELAY 15000 ${.TARGET}
opt_scsi.h isn't needed by aha or ahb either, so it can be deleted
entirely from their module makefiles:
Index: aha/Makefile
===
--- aha/Makefile(revision 214058)
+++ aha/Makefile(working copy)
@@ -4,11 +4,6 @@
On Tue Oct 19 10, Warner Losh wrote:
opt_scsi.h isn't needed by aha or ahb either, so it can be deleted
entirely from their module makefiles:
thanks. :)
what about trb/Makefile? seems to build fine too without opt_scsi.h.
Index: aha/Makefile
On 10/19/10 5:39 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
opt_scsi.h isn't needed by aha or ahb either, so it can be deleted
entirely from their module makefiles:
consider I write the original aha driver in 1991 and it is an ISA device,
one wonders if there are any users of this any more..
Index:
Something trivial I noticed while browsing device.hints(5) today.
If someone could commit the typo fix, it would be much appreciated.
Cheers!
-Garrett
Index: share/man/man5/device.hints.5
===
--- share/man/man5/device.hints.5
on 20/10/2010 02:36 Alexander Best said the following:
[snip]
mentation at least would be rather inelegant, because of the current
inability of the sysctl code to handle the addition of nodes after com-
pile time. Thus, it would take one dynamically sized sysctl variable and
21 matches
Mail list logo
