tls_model in clang?

2011-06-28 Thread Ben Laurie
.../lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c:1106:38: warning: unknown attribute 'tls_model' ignored [-Wattributes] static __thread arena_t *arenas_map TLS_MODEL; ^ .../lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c:243:37: note: instantiated from: # define TLS_MODEL

Default value for UIDs

2011-06-28 Thread Chris Rees
Hi all, [crees@zeus]~% tail -n 2 /usr/ports/UIDs dbxml:*:949:949::0:0:dbXML user:/nonexistent:/sbin/nologin nobody:*:65534:65534::0:0:Unprivileged user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin [crees@zeus]~% grep crees /etc/passwd crees:*:1001:1001:Chris Rees:/home/crees:/bin/tcsh chris:*:1001:1001:Chris

Re: Default value for UIDs

2011-06-28 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jun 28), Chris Rees said: Hi all, [crees@zeus]~% tail -n 2 /usr/ports/UIDs dbxml:*:949:949::0:0:dbXML user:/nonexistent:/sbin/nologin nobody:*:65534:65534::0:0:Unprivileged user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin [crees@zeus]~% grep crees /etc/passwd

Re: Default value for UIDs

2011-06-28 Thread Chris Rees
On 28 June 2011 17:59, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote: In the last episode (Jun 28), Chris Rees said: Hi all, [crees@zeus]~% tail -n 2 /usr/ports/UIDs dbxml:*:949:949::0:0:dbXML user:/nonexistent:/sbin/nologin nobody:*:65534:65534::0:0:Unprivileged

How can process in STOP state consume 200% CPU?

2011-06-28 Thread Yuri
I got VirtualBox process in a strange state. It has the status STOP but shows by top as consuming 200% CPU for a very long time. How is this possible and what does this mean? Process time stays at 0:00 TIME. kill -9 doesn't kill it. PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C

Re: Default value for UIDs

2011-06-28 Thread Chris Rees
On 28 June 2011 20:50, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 06:30:23PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: On 28 June 2011 17:59, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote: In the last episode (Jun 28), Chris Rees said: Hi all, [crees@zeus]~% tail -n 2 /usr/ports/UIDs

Re: How can process in STOP state consume 200% CPU?

2011-06-28 Thread Josh Carroll
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: I got VirtualBox process in a strange state. It has the status STOP but shows by top as consuming 200% CPU for a very long time. How is this possible and what does this mean? Process time stays at 0:00 TIME. kill -9 doesn't kill it.

Re: Default value for UIDs

2011-06-28 Thread Chris Rees
On 28 June 2011 20:57, Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 28 June 2011 20:50, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 06:30:23PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: On 28 June 2011 17:59, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote: In the last episode (Jun 28), Chris Rees said: Hi all,

Re: Default value for UIDs

2011-06-28 Thread jhell
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 06:30:23PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: On 28 June 2011 17:59, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote: In the last episode (Jun 28), Chris Rees said: Hi all, [crees@zeus]~% tail -n 2 /usr/ports/UIDs dbxml:*:949:949::0:0:dbXML user:/nonexistent:/sbin/nologin

Re: How can process in STOP state consume 200% CPU?

2011-06-28 Thread jhell
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:40:29AM -0700, Yuri wrote: I got VirtualBox process in a strange state. It has the status STOP but shows by top as consuming 200% CPU for a very long time. How is this possible and what does this mean? Process time stays at 0:00 TIME. kill -9 doesn't kill it.

Re: Default value for UIDs

2011-06-28 Thread Greg Lewis
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 09:11:54PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: On 28 June 2011 20:57, Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 28 June 2011 20:50, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 06:30:23PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: On 28 June 2011 17:59, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com

Re: Default value for UIDs

2011-06-28 Thread Chris Rees
On 28 Jun 2011 21:33, Greg Lewis gle...@eyesbeyond.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 09:11:54PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: On 28 June 2011 20:57, Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 28 June 2011 20:50, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote: Also: (stable/8) /usr/ports/UIDs

Re: How can process in STOP state consume 200% CPU?

2011-06-28 Thread perryh
Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: kill -9 doesn't kill it. I think I've seen this before; it looks as if, since the process is STOPped, the kill -9 remains pending rather than being acted upon. I _think_ you can make the process go away by doing a kill -CONT after the kill -9. No idea how a STOPped

Re: How can process in STOP state consume 200% CPU?

2011-06-28 Thread Yuri
On 06/28/2011 17:24, Sergey Babkin wrote: (Sorry about quoting, it doesn't always work well from the web client). Most probably the process is running in an endless loop in the kernel mode. Where it got after entering the STOP state. Remember, the signals are processed only after the process

Re: Re: How can process in STOP state consume 200% CPU?

2011-06-28 Thread Sergey Babkin
Jun 28, 2011 04:29:35 PM, jh...@dataix.net wrote: I got Vir= tualBox process in a strange state. It has the status STOP but = shows by top as consuming 200% CPU for a very long time. How i= s this possible and what does this mean? Process time stays at 0:00 = ; TIME. kill

Re: How can process in STOP state consume 200% CPU?

2011-06-28 Thread perryh
Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: On 06/28/2011 17:24, Sergey Babkin wrote: Most probably the process is running in an endless loop in the kernel mode ... While it's in the kernel mode, you can't do anything to it other than use the kernel debugger. How is this normally possible to make