On 08/21/12 09:32 AM, Dan McGregor wrote:
Hi.
I've been working on porting compiler-rt/clang's support for address
sanitization (asan) to FreeBSD. So far I have it building and it
appears to work properly, however the build system expects to be able
to build 32 bit binaries on amd64.
amd64
Even without this tagging, the code to do a structure level copy of 6 bytes is
going to be tiny...
true.
just to make sure it will be absolutely portable how about
bcopymacaddress(dst,src)
and then define it whatever you find it fastest on any architecture?
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:32:41PM -0600, Dan McGregor wrote:
Hi.
I've been working on porting compiler-rt/clang's support for address
sanitization (asan) to FreeBSD. So far I have it building and it
appears to work properly, however the build system expects to be able
to build 32 bit
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
Dag-Erling, do you have a timeline for getting started on the
ldns/unbound import?
I imported the code into the vendor tree, but did not proceed any
further as there was still no firm consensus at the time.
I believe the conclusion - to the extent that
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 05:46:12PM +0300, Mitya wrote:
Hi.
I found some overhead code in /src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c and
/src/sys/netgraph/ng_ether.c
It contains strings, like bcopy(src, dst, ETHER_ADDR_LEN);
When src and dst are struct ether_addr*, and ETHER_ADDR_LEN equal 6.
This code
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:26:30PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
...
Why we are use bcopy(), to copy only 6 bytes?
Answer - in some architectures we are can not directly copy unaligned data.
I propose this solution.
In file /usr/src/include/net/ethernet.h add this lines:
static
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:20:29PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Aug 20, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
or use ++.
i think it is always aligned to 2 bytes and this should produce usable
code on any CPU? should be 6 instructions on MIPS and PPC IMHO.
We should tag it as
20.08.2012 22:20, Warner Losh написал:
On Aug 20, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
or use ++.
i think it is always aligned to 2 bytes and this should produce usable code on
any CPU? should be 6 instructions on MIPS and PPC IMHO.
We should tag it as __aligned(2) then, no? If so,
21.08.2012 14:26, Marius Strobl написал:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:20:29PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Aug 20, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
or use ++.
i think it is always aligned to 2 bytes and this should produce usable code on
any CPU? should be 6 instructions on MIPS and
On Aug 21, 2012, at 5:26 AM, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:20:29PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Aug 20, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
or use ++.
i think it is always aligned to 2 bytes and this should produce usable
code on any CPU? should be 6
Hi All,
Please help to solve a kernel memory leak problem.
After few weeks searching forums and googling any help is welcome.
Here is the problem description:
We are installed the latest 9.0 FreeBSD with all recent patches.
Ports tree is also up to date.
Host running a nginx, php-fpm, memcached,
On Monday, August 20, 2012 10:46:12 am Mitya wrote:
Hi.
I found some overhead code in /src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c and
/src/sys/netgraph/ng_ether.c
It contains strings, like bcopy(src, dst, ETHER_ADDR_LEN);
When src and dst are struct ether_addr*, and ETHER_ADDR_LEN equal 6.
This code call
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 4:49:30 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:32:41PM -0600, Dan McGregor wrote:
Hi.
I've been working on porting compiler-rt/clang's support for address
sanitization (asan) to FreeBSD. So far I have it building and it
appears to work
My solution is certainly fairly hacky, I just took inspiration from
NetBSD. I wanted
to see if it could be done. While I was there I did identify several
files that should be
common between i386 and amd64, such as exec.h.
Since reading your email I started looking at the x86 common code, and
On Aug 21, 2012, at 1:42 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Even without this tagging, the code to do a structure level copy of 6 bytes
is going to be tiny...
true.
just to make sure it will be absolutely portable how about
bcopymacaddress(dst,src)
and then define it whatever you find
I think I agree now. The more code shared between archtectures the
better. I've committed some patches to my github freebsd fork that
merge exec.h, asm.h and ucontex.h into x86. I'll probably do more
later tonight.
On 21 August 2012 07:44, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tuesday,
FWIW - there's lots of statistics and some dtrace scripts + output here.
So for those knowlegable in this area, this forum thread is well worth
your time.
Adrian
On 21 August 2012 07:42, Remme adscomp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Please help to solve a kernel memory leak problem.
After few
Hi,
What about just creating an ETHER_ADDR_COPY(dst, src) and putting that
in a relevant include file, then hide the ugliness there?
The same benefits will likely appear when copying wifi MAC addresses
to/from headers.
Thanks, I'm glad someone noticed this.
Adrian
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
Dag-Erling, do you have a timeline for getting started on the
ldns/unbound import?
I imported the code into the vendor tree, but did not proceed any
further as there was still no firm consensus at the time.
On 08/21/12 08:44, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 4:49:30 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:32:41PM -0600, Dan McGregor wrote:
Hi.
I've been working on porting compiler-rt/clang's support for address
sanitization (asan) to FreeBSD. So far I have it
On 8/21/2012 10:11 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
Dag-Erling, do you have a timeline for getting started on the
ldns/unbound import?
I imported the code into the vendor tree, but did not proceed any
further
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
On 8/21/2012 10:11 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
Dag-Erling, do you have a timeline for getting started on the
ldns/unbound import?
I imported the code into the vendor
On 8/21/2012 11:08 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
Neither importing ldns nor removing BIND is going to have any effect on
the stub resolver library in libc.
Yes it does as if we are not carefull, we'll neither have a _proper_
validating caching resolver
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 05:46:12PM +0300, Mitya wrote:
Hi.
I found some overhead code in /src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c and
/src/sys/netgraph/ng_ether.c
It contains strings, like bcopy(src, dst, ETHER_ADDR_LEN);
When src and dst are struct ether_addr*, and ETHER_ADDR_LEN equal 6.
Only
How do the unified powerpc headers work? Is it just one architecture
for both PowerPC and 64 bit PowerPC? If so, was that tijl's ultimate
goal? One architecture for i386 and AMD64?
On the unifying headers front, I've make a bunch of progress towards
merging i386 and amd64 headers into x86;
luigi wrote:
even more orthogonal:
I found that copying 8n + (5, 6 or 7) bytes was much much slower than
copying a multiple of 8 bytes. For n=0, 1,2,4,8 bytes are efficient,
other cases are slow (turned into 2 or 3 different writes).
The netmap code uses a pkt_copy routine that does
jhb wrote:
On Monday, August 20, 2012 10:46:12 am Mitya wrote:
...
I propose this solution.
In file /usr/src/include/net/ethernet.h add this lines:
static inline void ether_addr_copy(ether_addr* src, ether_addr* dst) {
#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__amd64__)
*dst =
On Aug 17, 2012, at 05:24 , Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:
projects/armv6 branch was merged to HEAD and should be considered dead now.
This patch is a result of a joint effort by many people. Including but not
limited to:
28 matches
Mail list logo
