On 10/10/10 7:09 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Oct 9, 2010, at 10:25 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
For what it matters, I'v enever found the [ x$foo = x ] construct to be
useful.
the quoting seems to work for everything I've ever worked on.
There have been times where I had scripts which
On 10/10/10 8:46 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Oct 10, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Garance A Drosihn dro...@rpi.edu
mailto:dro...@rpi.edu wrote:
The latter does not cause an error. Try it:
# [ -n = x ] ; echo $?
1
# [ -e = no ] ; echo $?
1
# [ -e = -n ] ; echo $?
1
1 is error. 0 is success.
--
Um
At 2:17 PM -0500 2/3/09, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I use a local cvs repo and I have modified a port and which to
submit an update for it how do I generate a patch file with cvs (cvs
diff seems to give a unusable format)?
try: cvs diff -u
In my case, i have added the following line to my
At 12:33 AM +0200 6/3/08, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
I have an old patch that makes kqueue monitor every file write on
the system and return the inode number in the knote's data field:
At 8:45 AM +0200 1/31/08, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
Hi,
Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what
to use as source revision control system (VCS) from today's offerings,
what would you choose to maintain FreeBSD's sources or a side-off
project tracking FreeBSD as base
At 11:31 AM -0500 8/16/06, Eric Anderson wrote:
My point was, that either path you take (if BSD_VISIBLE is
defined or not), you end up with d_name having a size of
255 + 1, so what's the point the having it at all?
To make it clear that d_name is tied to the exact value
of MAXNAMLEN (just in
At 7:03 PM -0400 7/11/06, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rick C. Petty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 02:25:21AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good packages for various APIs are much easier to learn/debug
than those original APIs.
What makes you say that
At 1:25 PM -0600 10/17/05, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: vi was the first screen/cursor-based editor in computer
: history.
Are you sure about this? I was using screen oriented editors over a
1200 baud dialup
At 12:06 PM +0200 8/10/05, Dirk GOUDERS wrote:
To get around this in user-space, we do things like create
/usr/include/sys/_types.h
And then our include files include *that* file, and do not include
the standard sys/types.h. This sys/_types.h file, in turn, does
not define any of
At 12:22 AM +0200 8/10/05, Dirk GOUDERS wrote:
This is intentational. We try to avoid having headers bring in
more then absolutly required when included. I'm not sure what
your second question means.
With my second question I wanted to ask if this intention is only
for kernel level code
At 3:40 PM -0700 6/10/05, Mike Hunter wrote:
Hey everybody,
I have a feeling that I'm missing something really obvious, but
I'm having trouble understanding why the following program:
Never prints anything but 0's.
Kernel generally clears out memory in the background. See also
the man
At 2:19 PM +0300 5/5/05, Erik Udo wrote:
I couldn't find a way to remove files that had scandic/non-printable
letters, then i remembered ls showed inode number of the file. Is it
possible to remove the file by the inode number? It would be a
useful feature :)
It would be a bad feature, at least
At 6:46 PM +0200 4/12/05, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Steven Hartland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the feedback seems very strange that sshd was the first thing the
kernel killed off; so unless it was actually
at fault ( would be very strange )
it would have been one of the smallest not
At 7:41 AM -0800 3/29/05, mohamed aslan wrote:
guys this is not a flame war
but the linux way in arranging the source file is really better
than freebsd way, it's a fact.
however it's easy to rearrange it in 1 min as someone said before.
but i mean this step should be done from the core team.
for
At 2:11 PM -0500 2/23/05, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 10:46 AM +0100 2/23/05, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I saw ARG_MAX was increased in 6.0. Recently I noticed that
the lang/fpc-devel port currently hits the old limit in
certain (though rare) cases), and this is annoying.
(some testing revealed
At 10:46 AM +0100 2/23/05, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I saw ARG_MAX was increased in 6.0. Recently I noticed that
the lang/fpc-devel port currently hits the old limit in
certain (though rare) cases), and this is annoying.
(some testing revealed that half the increase of 6.0
to 131k params is also
At 5:16 PM +1100 2/14/05, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Sun, 2005-Feb-13 19:50:44 +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
IMHO to be more robust, we should make utmp to hold an IP address
instead of a hostname and change all applications that use it. As
bonus it will fix a delay on login when resolving does
At 8:58 PM +0100 12/7/04, Miguel Mendez wrote:
Hi hackers,
I've seen the OpenBSD guys have come up with a BSD-licensed CVS[1]
that should be focused on security as well as features. Is there
any chance that this could make it into FreeBSD's tree as well?
[1] http://www.openbsd.org/opencvs/
From
At 3:36 PM -0500 11/10/04, Sam Hopkins wrote:
Hello all,
Just a quick note to mention that I've added AoE support to
FreeBSD 4.10, 5.3, and 6.0. Patches are available at
http://www.coraid.com/support/freebsd.
If anyone knows where else I could announce this, I'd
appreciate it.
This looks
At 8:57 PM +0300 10/2/04, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2004-10-02 21:23, Lee Harr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Beck, who works for Sun, has posted an entry in his blog
yesterday about rm -fr / protection, which I liked a lot:
At 10:23 PM +0300 7/20/04, Stas D.Myasnikov wrote:
... I had thought that install script removes all unneeded files,
but it don't. How can I clean out this old binaries, configs, etc?..
Is there any automatic way to do this?
You can: make cleanworld
which does a fairly decent job of getting rid
At 10:48 AM +1000 6/22/04, Greg Black wrote:
The output of ls has never been good for reproduceable output
for identical data. It frequently leads to gigantic diffs
in periodic reports which makes them useless, as far as I can
tell. Take the following case:
Hmm. I never thought much about that
At 4:14 AM +0200 6/20/04, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
is it normal that the selected process is the last forked thread
and not the thread owner (father) ?
I committed the changes, so people can try this if they want.
Example:
(48) ps -HO lwp,nlwp
PIDLWP NLWP TT STAT TIME COMMAND
1870
At 6:50 PM +0100 6/19/04, Scott Mitchell wrote:
Is this intended behaviour? If so, the documentation is wrong.
Otherwise, the attached patch produces the expected output. I
can commit it if there are no objections.
Your patch looks like a reasonable change to me. By definition,
there can be no
At 9:37 AM -0600 6/7/04, Scott Long wrote:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
I think you have to officially demote it, with emphasis on the
point that demotion is not a terminal condition. Then, if some
developer(s) show up and implement all the missing pieces, we
can happily announce it back in tier 1
At 3:46 PM -0600 6/6/04, Scott Long wrote:
At this point, I'm going to advocate that Alpha be dropped from
Tier-1 status for 5.3 and 5-STABLE and no longer be a blocking
item for releases. ... As I said back then, demotion is not a
terminal condition, and I would be thrilled if someone comes
[this is BCC'ed to -hackers and -arch just so everyone has a
chance to see it, but I expect the bulk of the discussion
should take place on the freebsd-ports mailing list]
Well, Darren and I have done more work on my pkg-data ideas,
but we're also getting closer to the time where
At 2:45 PM +0930 5/23/04, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
There is valgrind..
http://www.rabson.org/#valgrind
I thought it was in ports but I can't see it.
___
Note the separate message:
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 21:46:32 +0200
From: Simon Barner [EMAIL
At 12:23 PM -0700 4/21/04, Julian Elischer wrote:
Ok so I have an application where I need to
reread a file I have just written to ensure that it went to disk
correctly..
Other than reading a few GB of data, is there a way to flush
out the cache copy of a file I've written?
possibilities include:
[this is BCC'ed to -hackers and -arch just so everyone has a
chance to see it, but I expect the bulk of the discussion
should take place on the freebsd-ports mailing list]
Back in January I send out a long-ish email asking for feedback
on some ideas I had for the ports-collection. I
At 5:18 PM -0400 4/8/04, John Von Essen wrote:
Hi,
Have a few questions for you. Would the fund raising be handled
through FreeBSD or direct to you?
He has answered that. Funding direct to PHK.
Please READ the web page that you quoted from his original
message:
At 10:22 AM -1000 3/21/04, Clifton Royston wrote:
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 From: Garance A Drosihn
So, by adding one call to strcmp() to check for a : string, I
end up with /bin/ps (the stripped-object-file) which has grown
by 12.6% !! This is for a program which is almost 2500 lines
At 2:52 PM -0800 3/21/04, Kip Macy wrote:
The heuristics vary from platform to platform - what does
objdump -d show?
Based on what I see from that, the 'ps.o' which has the extra
strcmp is about 40 bytes larger than the one without it. And
now that you mention it, doing a plain 'ls -l' of ps.o
At 7:35 PM -0500 3/21/04, Don Bowman wrote:
From: Garance A Drosihn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So maybe this has something to do with how linking is done
for ELF modules. Unfortunately, I need to be concentrating
on something else right now...
It's not just bumping you up another module 4K
I have written a fairly major set of changes to the `ps' command,
which is available as:
http://people.freebsd.org/~gad/ps-susv3.diff
Debate/discussion about the changes themselves actual changes should
be going on in the freebsd-standards mailing list. So for purposes
of this mailing list,
At 12:18 PM -0800 3/6/04, Tim Kientzle wrote:
... I've been scratching my head over how to
deal with the version ID code that is supposed
to apear as the first two lines of any FreeBSD
source file:
#include sys/cdefs.h
__FBSDID($FreeBSD$);
Clearly, I cannot reasonably assume that all
platforms
[this is being BCC'ed to -arch and -hackers just to make sure
that everyone is aware of this before changes are committed,
but I expect all of the discussion to happen on -current]
Sparc64 users (including me) have said that we'd like the sparc64
port to be running with a 64-bit time_t
At 10:19 AM -0700 2/15/04, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Garance A Drosihn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: realclean :
: rm -Rf ${.OBJDIR}/*
I'd make that be more like:
realclean :
@chflags -R 0 ${.OBJDIR}/*
@rm -Rf ${.OBJDIR}/*
If you can
At 10:19 AM -0700 2/15/04, M. Warner Losh wrote:
If you can tolerate errors in the output, the following is
faster because the chflags has lots less work to do:
realclean :
@rm -Rf ${.OBJDIR}/*
@chflags -R 0 ${.OBJDIR}/*
@rm -Rf ${.OBJDIR}/*
After some testing, I am
In the instructions I am writing up for a sparc64 change, I wrote
that people should:
rm -Rf /usr/obj/usr/src/*
to make sure they got rid of everything in the previous buildworld.
Some developers reminded me that this isn't always the right thing
to do (depending on symlinks or on various
At 10:00 AM + 1/11/04, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 00:05, Peter Jeremy wrote:
I disagree. Andrew raised two issues (type of license and
port vs base location). The type of license is an input to
the decision as to which SCM to choose - BSD preferable ...
Subversion has a
At 7:27 PM -0800 1/9/04, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Hi;
There is a comparison here:
http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html
I think there are compelling reasons to try subversion,
but we have to wait for a 1.0 Release, and this would be
something that should be done gradually.. for
At 9:05 AM -0800 1/10/04, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
--- Garance A Drosihn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a pretty major test! Could we perhaps pick off
something smaller? The projects repository, for
instance? (or is that still tied to the base-system?)
SVN is meant to be a replacement
At 9:35 PM + 1/10/04, Andrew Boothman wrote:
Peter Schuller wrote:
Most of the noteworthy features of subversion are listed
on the project front page:
http://subversion.tigris.org/
A significant one of which is the fact that it's available
under a BSD-style license. Meaning that the
At 12:42 PM +0100 1/7/04, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Paul Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If 5.3, when it arrives, is genuinely production ready, trust
me, the drinks are on me - I will do my absolute best to get
to the next BSDcon and get everybody drunk on an expense
account. If it
At 9:57 AM -0500 1/7/04, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Speaking with a user hat on, I'll comment on what I believe
is the crux of the 5.x issue.
The take away I see is that this was too big of a chunk.
The next bite planned needs to be smaller.
I agree with this observation, but then it's easy to see that
At 12:41 PM -0500 12/8/03, Damian Gerow wrote:
Thus spake Garance A Drosihn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [06/12/03 03:31]:
From the above description, it sounds like you are running
on a 5.1 system, and you are trying to compile a 5.2 kernel.
Is this true?
If the system you are on is 5.1, then you
At 6:13 PM +0100 12/7/03, Blaz Zupan wrote:
In the last couple of days I've been fighting with a evaluation
IBM BladeCenter. [...]
My company would really like to deploy the Bladecenter as it
is otherwise a very solid solution for our problem. But 99.9%
of our servers are FreeBSD and the above
At 1:45 AM -0600 12/6/03, William M. Grim wrote:
Hey there! I'm having a slight problem performing a build
on my FreeBSD 5.1 machine. I downloaded the 5-CURRENT
source code and only added the line, device pcm to
the GENERIC kernel, renaming it to ZEUS.
Then, I went into /usr/src and typed
At 11:18 PM -0500 10/29/03, Robert Watson wrote:
In the past when browsing the Linux source code, I've made
extensive use of the Linux Cross-Reference (LXR) hosted at
lxr.linux.no.
For FreeBSD, we provide a cvsweb interface that is extremely
useful for tracking changes, but a little less useful
At 7:08 PM -0400 10/16/03, Adil Katchi wrote:
I'm looking for the sshd source code for freebsd 4.7.
Any idea where I can find it in the CVS tree?
if you have the source tree on your machine (and if it
has been there for a week or so), then use the 'locate'
command:
locate openssh
You'll get a
At 10:23 AM -1000 9/16/03, Clifton Royston wrote:
In the meantime I'm trying to figure out if there's some
simple hack to disregard these wildcard A records, short of
requesting zone transfers of the root nameservers (e.g. via
peering with f.root-servers.net) and purging those records
out of the
At 8:53 PM +1000 9/15/03, Tim Robbins wrote:
Comments/patches are welcome. As the History suggestion
of the manual page suggests, my plan is to get this in to
FreeBSD 6, along with replacements for some other GNU tools.
Might we put this in freebsd-current (5.x), but under some
other name?
At 9:47 PM -0400 9/15/03, Richard Coleman wrote:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 8:53 PM +1000 9/15/03, Tim Robbins wrote:
Comments/patches are welcome. As the History suggestion
of the manual page suggests, my plan is to get this in to
FreeBSD 6, along with replacements for some other GNU tools
At 10:16 PM -0400 7/31/03, Chris BeHanna wrote:
Sorry, I should have written that I have performed tests:
Here is what I did:
test\ 1 /mnt/test\ 1ufs ro 0 0
'test 2''/mnt/test 2' ufs ro 0 0
test 3
At 10:15 AM -0800 3/21/03, Tim Kientzle wrote:
On Thu Mar 20, 2003, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
I need to recursively merge two directories of source files in
which I wish to preserve some original files, install some
replacement files outright, and only actually go to the trouble
of sdiff(1)ing
At 11:31 AM -0600 3/3/03, Peter Elsner wrote:
This particular printer is a high load printer, printing about
50 to 70 pages at a time. Occasionally, the printer just stops
while printing.
We have to force a 'lpc restart lsjd1p2' command several times
to get the printer to restart again.
You will
At 3:40 PM +0100 2/23/03, Michael Ranner wrote:
Am Freitag, 21. Februar 2003 Garance wrote:
I don't know how find-sb compares to the program you're
talking about, but they sound kind of similar.
Scan_ffs can print the lost disklabel for use with disklabel(8).
Find-sb, that version from cvs,
At 10:20 PM +0100 2/19/03, Michael Ranner wrote:
Hello!
I am trying to learn scan_ffs (original from OpenBSD, ported to
FreeBSD by Robert Watson) about UFS2 on 5-CURRENT, but it will
not find the Superblock and I dont understand exactly both for
loops, especially that 512 byte increment.
Scan_ffs
At 12:05 AM +0100 2/16/03, Friedemann Becker wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/47512
this happens only with the above link, i.e. from the pr summary.
searching for the bugid 47512 works (= not empty)
someone want to look at this?
The above link worked fine for me. I
On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 03:00 PM, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
I have noticed that that several FreeBSD files (.c, .h and so
on) have trailing whitespace (spaces/tabs after last charecter
on a line).
Should I send patches for this, or is it not important to fix?
It might be nice to fix,
At 3:21 AM -0800 2/5/03, Doug Barton wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Amit Rao wrote:
Allow users to pass regexps to ignore as an option?
similar to: diff --ignore-matching-lines=\$FreeBSD: ?
I decided to be more general, and added the DIFF_OPTIONS variable
to the script, and an example of
At 2:10 PM -0600 2/4/03, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 11:51:14AM -0800, Justin Lundy wrote:
Has similar work been done in FreeBSD been done? This would be
a nice feature in 5.0-CURRENT. We had SecureBSD, and the IBM
port of propolice, but both projects appear to be
At 11:43 PM -0800 2/4/03, Doug Barton wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 10:36 PM -0800 2/3/03, Doug Barton wrote:
There's a section of mergemaster that starts out with the comment
Do an absolute diff first to see if the files are actually different.
That's an option
At 9:12 AM -0800 2/3/03, Doug Barton wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
Well for one thing, if a given file has a lot of changes, then I
would like mergemaster to skip over
At 10:36 PM -0800 2/3/03, Doug Barton wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
I added:
-I '$FreeBSD:.*$'
to the 'diff ${DIFF_FLAG}' command in diff_loop, and it seems to
have worked the way I wanted it to work.
How did you want it to work? (This isn't a rhetorical
At 3:12 PM -0800 1/31/03, Matthew Dillon wrote:
But MP is another story. At some point I would like to put
together some SMP test boxes that don't cost the equivalent
of rent on a small apartment in electricity use. They don't
have to be super-fast, they just need to be SMP.
At 12:45 PM -0500 12/27/02, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 11:35:45AM -0600, Ryan Thompson wrote:
Problem is, smb requires a '$' at the end of the username, which our
pw(8) doesn't allow.
The same patch which you proposed was suggested on the freebsd-current list.
See the
At 7:12 PM -0800 12/20/02, Sean Hamilton wrote:
Greetings,
How does the kernel on the FreeBSD install CD know which device to
mount as root? I'm assuming it hasn't got a ROOTDEVNAME config
option, since that would make it fairly specific to certain hardware.
Mine always tries to mount fd0.
At 10:48 PM +0100 12/19/02, Michael Ranner wrote:
Hello!
I have done some research for utmp improvement for FreeBSD and
found the following URL which sounds very intersting:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2002/debian-bsd-200202/msg00142.html
The author has posted an article in
On 11/25/02, Peter Elsner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wanted to know:
Hello All...
Something appears to be broken with lpq and lprm. I'm writing
a Perl script to easily allow users to manage printers/jobs
from a easy to use interface.
1st problem (lpq): man lpq displays the use as follows:
NAME
At 9:02 PM +0200 10/4/02, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
There are numerous architectural issues which have never been
fixed in vinum, and one or more of these bits now.
Whoever loves vinum will have to chase it/them down and fix it.
If I receive patches or requests for changes to GEOM as result
of
At 10:11 AM +0200 10/3/02, Mark Santcroos wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:04:04AM +0100, Ian Dowse wrote:
See the patch I posted in:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=0+6285+/usr/local/www/db/text/2002/freebsd-emulation/20020908.freebsd-emulation
There may still be
At 8:45 PM -0400 7/18/02, Robert Watson wrote:
I've seen many base system developers commit man pages, but few
commit to the docbook/sgml side of things in the doc project.
[...] The FreeBSD src developer community is, after all, a
community of people who write software that frequently ships
with
At 6:29 AM +0930 7/6/02, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hmmm, I think that the major part of the problem there was that,
for what ever reason, Barry Feigenbaum of IBM, declined to add
a Change Working Directory or Set Working Diretory command to
the SMB protocol.
Thus, at least for the SMB protocol, and
At 4:49 PM +0100 7/2/02, Byron Schlemmer wrote:
Hi,
I've posted on this before, and I've received no reply. I'm
cross-posting just in case it was missed before (I am desperate for
help) and to ask for further advice.
Basically we have a number of FreeBSD servers, running 4.5-RELEASE
and
At 2:37 PM -0400 4/23/02, Robert Watson wrote:
Here I'll disagree with you: we make a concerted effort to
produce a system that is safe to use. This involves a number
of things, and it doesn't just mean security fixes. I would
argue that we have a moral obligation to do so.
I agree that there
At 8:44 AM +0930 4/24/02, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 April 2002 at 12:06:01 +0200, Jochem Kossen wrote:
*shrug* I was the one who sent in the patch. It was added
some time around 2001/10/26 to the XFree86-4 megaport. When
the metaport was created, the patch was
At 6:40 PM -0700 4/22/02, Peter Wemm wrote:
Mike Meyer wrote:
Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
My question: Who's wrong here, FreeBSD or Mac OS X? If the latter,
Someone decided that FreeBSD should do challengeresponse
authentication by default. You can fix it by uncommenting
At 8:45 PM +1000 4/9/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't make me use the kernel debugger... waa
I believe Terry suggested:
...set the DISPLAY environment variable so that it uses a
real network connection, instead of a UNIX domain socket
(and thus allows the use of the MIT
At 12:57 PM -0800 3/21/02, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, John Polstra wrote:
I thought about the .stabs approach too, and thought it seemed
promising. Even better might be to use -gdwarf -g3, which in
theory at least would provide information about #defines.
For
At 2:48 PM -0800 3/8/02, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Kenneth Culver wrote:
If you want, I can make you some patches, I think I still
remember when they went in... however I can't do any more
than that...
I'm sure I can get them,
I'm just trying to find who it was that
At 2:16 AM -0500 3/7/02, Brian T.Schellenberger wrote:
Maybe your brain has gotten used to it, but to us ordinary
mortals, even us ordinary mortals who've been slogging C
code for time periods that can be measured in decades
(yikes!), it is very tempting to read
if (!strcmp(a,b,l))
as if the
In one message,
At 12:52 AM -0800 3/6/02, David O'Brien wrote:
I don't think it is clarifying a rule. I think it is in fact adding
a rule. You are extrapolating too much I think. All the rule is
trying to prevent is if (!strcmp(a,b)) which when read is extremely
wrong of that is actually
At 7:49 PM +0100 3/6/02, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Garance A Drosihn writes:
In one message,
At 12:52 AM -0800 3/6/02, David O'Brien wrote:
I don't think it is clarifying a rule. I think it is in fact adding
a rule. You are extrapolating too much I think. All the rule is
trying
At 5:07 PM +0300 3/5/02, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
Hello,
I have a small problem. I work for software development company and
write daemons and console tools for Unix. My boss wants everything
to be written in C++, because he thinks C++ is cool. I prefer C
for such tasks, but I cannot really put
At 3:16 PM +0100 2/15/02, Konrad Heuer wrote:
Unfortunately, some changes in the lpd code that happened last year
(as far as I remember) are very disadvantageous for the operation
of our (heavily loaded) printer server which is based on FreeBSD
for years now.
Well, I'm willing to see what we can
At 4:10 AM +0300 2/9/02, Vladislav V. Anikiev wrote:
Hello Brian,
The MAC address - I meen The Media Access Control address (i.e., ethernet
hardware address, not IP address). I want to use the default hardware (not
current physical ) address in my license management software.
Why did
At 10:54 PM -0500 1/4/02, David Miller wrote:
What I usually want to do is something more like ls *.out |wc -l,
or grep something *.data or cat *.foo | grep something.
I have rebuilt the system in the past after greatly expanding
ARG_MAX, and that does what I want. I'm just looking for an easy
Okay.
Could we move the trip(s) down memory lane to some other mailing list?
I'm certainly old enough to wax nostalgic about many things, but somehow
freebsd-hackers doesn't seem to be an appropriate place to do that.
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems
At 10:35 AM -0800 12/13/01, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Are there still bugs in NFS? You bet! I'm sure there are bugs
related to multiple clients and/or the server modifying files out
from under a client, and I think the potential issue with nfsiod
ordering that was posted to the
While on the topic of 'dump', note that there's also the patch in
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32414
which fixes a problem where dump will include information that
should not be included (due to the nodump flag being set). This
too would result in dump files larger than
At 2:54 PM -0600 12/3/01, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Sergey Matveychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011203 07:55] wrote:
Hi!
Why widechar functions is not implemented? Is there real difficulty?
And can I get it somwhere from a external lib? I need towupper,
towlower and iswspace.
If you can
At 7:35 AM -0800 11/15/01, John Baldwin wrote:
On 15-Nov-01 Glenn Gombert wrote:
Thanks for the tip Ian ...this works great! I have applied this patch
to my desktop system ...and the FreeBSD Current kernel with this patch
applied boots right up now...anyone else running Current under
At 11:29 AM -0700 10/27/01, Terry Lambert wrote:
Mike Barcroft wrote:
I recommend using newsyslog(8) for rotating log files.
I recommend _NOT_ using newsyslog for rotating files.
The problem is that newsyslog doesn't rewrite history.
As an example, say you have [...]
Now you can only rotate
At 12:50 PM -0700 10/17/01, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
I fully support your idea of offering a bounty to anyone writing
drivers for your cards and think you're being more than generous in
offering it. I wish more vendors would do that and I'm sorry that
this discussion has gotten as polarized as it
I imagine Garrett and other standards-minded people have already seen
this question, but I thought I'd echo it to the freebsd-standards
mailing list. It's about a PR which makes a minor change to
sys/types.h to solve some compile-time errors so that a program
compiled with -D_POSIX_SOURCE
At 12:39 AM -0700 8/7/01, Mike Smith wrote:
It also has the unfortunate property of locking us into virtual
wire mode, when in fact Microsoft demonstrated that wiring down
interrupts to particular CPUs was good practice, in terms of
assuring best performance. Specifically, running in
At 9:55 AM -0700 8/7/01, Matt Dillon wrote:
: It also has the unfortunate property of locking us into virtual
: wire mode, when in fact Microsoft demonstrated that wiring down
: interrupts to particular CPUs was good practice, in terms of
: assuring best performance. [...]
:
: Terry, this is
At 10:57 PM -0700 8/3/01, Terry Lambert wrote:
Rik van Riel wrote:
This is a trivial implementation. I'm not very impressed.
Personally, I'm not interested in a huge user space,
Maybe not you, but I bet the database and scientific
computing people will be interested in having 64 GB
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
