It's dawning in Beijing now. I'm quite tired. Here, I only summarize
the solution as is. I will write a complete hacking report after a rest.
1. Restore your /sys/compat/linux/linux_file.c to the original revision
1.99 (7.0-CURRENT) if you have applied my yesterday's patch. You have
two
My patch for /sys/compat/linux/linux_file.c (7.0-CURRENT) can
partially unbreak Adobe Reader 7.0.8 for Linux when the sysctl
compat.linux.osrelease is set to 2.6.16. You may download the patch
at:
http://ftp.intron.ac/tmp/linux_file.c.diff
But probably to your disappointment, the
Yuan, Jue wrote:
Hi all.
Could I change the kernel version tag manually? say, I have a kernel which is
7.0-CUREENT, but for some reasons I wanna it be something like 6.1-RELEASE,
while the kernel itself does't change from 7.0-CURRENT to 6.1-RELEASE. All I
want is the change of tag. For
Jason Evans wrote:
(LI Xin) wrote:
2006-08-15 02:38 +0300ladimir Kushnir On -CURENT amd64 (Athlon64 3000+, 512k
L2 cache):
With jemalloc (without MY_MALLOS):
~/fdtd /usr/bin/time ./fdtd.FreeBSD 500 500 1000
...
116.34 real 113.69 user 0.00 sys
With MY_MALLOC:
~/fdtd
at 10:50:25PM +0800, Intron wrote:
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:08:20 +0800 Intron wrote:
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 07:10:47AM +0800, Intron wrote:
One day, a friend told me that his program was 3 times slower under
FreeBSD 6.1 than under GNU/Linux (from Redhat 7.2 to Fedora Core 5).
I was astonished by the real repeatable performance difference on
AMD Athlon XP
Vladimir Kushnir wrote:
Sorry for intrusion.
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 07:10:47AM +0800, Intron wrote:
One day, a friend told me that his program was 3 times slower under
FreeBSD 6.1 than under GNU/Linux (from Redhat 7.2 to Fedora Core 5).
I
Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smo/rgrav wrote:
Sean Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm writing some cd buring software using burncd as a reference. I was
wondering if its possible to detect opening and closing of the doors.
Unfortunately, no. The drive may not even have a door.
DES
--
Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smo/rgrav wrote:
Intron [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smo/rgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sean Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm writing some cd buring software using burncd as a reference.
I was wondering if its possible to detect opening and closing
Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smo/rgrav wrote:
Intron [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smo/rgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Intron [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, software can command the drive to open/close its door.
This is not what Sean wants.
I want to tell Sean that he is not worth
Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smo/rgrav wrote:
Intron [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smo/rgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How does ridiculing me help Sean?
Can your unilateral judgement give real help to Sean?
Welcome to my kill file. Enjoy your stay.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smo/rgrav - [EMAIL
The section 4.11.1 Removable Media Status Notification feature set
of ATA/ATAPI-7 (http://t13.org/docs2004/d1532v1r4b-ATA-ATAPI-7.pdf) reads,
d) Host system periodically checks media status using the GET MEDIA
STATUS command to determine if any of the following events occurred:
- no media is
One day, a friend told me that his program was 3 times slower under
FreeBSD 6.1 than under GNU/Linux (from Redhat 7.2 to Fedora Core 5).
I was astonished by the real repeatable performance difference on
AMD Athlon XP 2500+ (1.8GHz, 512KB L2 Cache).
After hacking, I found that the problem is
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
You may try these patches, first.
http://people.freebsd.org/~imura/kiconv/
It sounds like these patches implement better supports.
Hiro
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:28:17 +0800
Intron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry that I send my experimental patch set here to call
I'm sorry that I send my experimental patch set here to call for test.
But if I send it to freebsd-i18n@, I wonder no one will respond to me.
Download: http://ftp.intron.ac/tmp/kiconv_utf8_20060813.tar.bz2
My patch set implements a UTF-8 - UTF-16BE converter for iconv in
kernel. It doesn't need
Divacky Roman wrote:
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 12:57:32PM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote:
hi,
while working on SoC linuxolator project I am in a need of this:
I need to do some operation on memory like mem1 = mem1 + mem2 etc.
where the mem1/mem2 access can trigger fault. (memory not mapped or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31.07.2006 14:12:20, Intron wrote:
Mutex(9) is sometimes too heavy, and has many limitations, while sx(9)
is somewhat enough.
First paragraph from sx(9) manual says:
Shared/exclusive locks are used to protect data that are read
far more often
Divacky Roman wrote:
hi,
while working on SoC linuxolator project I am in a need of this:
I need to do some operation on memory like mem1 = mem1 + mem2 etc.
where the mem1/mem2 access can trigger fault. (memory not mapped or something)
currently I solve this by using pcb_onfault. this must
I have add relevant options into my kernel (7.0-CURRENT) configuration
file:
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
options KDB
options DDB
options GDB
options INVARIANTS
options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
options WITNESS
options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN
When kernel
Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smo/rgrav wrote:
Intron [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When kernel panics, the prompt db will appear. But at this time
I cannot control my computer with keyboard any longer. What's wrong
with me?
I don't know what's wrong with you, but as regards your computer:
disable
Why does uma_zdestroy(9) print message like:
Freed UMA keg was not empty (100 items). Lost 2 pages of memory.
But actually I have made sure that uma_zalloc(9) and uma_zfree(9) appear
in pair in my code. Does it represent any problems?
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Tue, 2006-Jul-18 22:11:45 -0300, Charles A. Landemaine wrote:
Aside from the fact that some vendors don't cooperate to release
hardware specifications, is there something we could do to revert this
situation?
I suspect the major problems are lack of interface
Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
C++ is the de-facto standard for OO: a lot of people know how to use it
Oh gods, does this bring to mind lots (and *lots*) of scathing
commentary. I'll restrict myself to just one:
Windows is the de-facto standard OS: a lot of
Jason Slagle wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would repeat several sentences in my last reply.
Why would people write Windows application with rather MFC/ATL/.NET
Framework than direct Windows API? Why is gtkmm framework created for
GTK+? Would you write a X11
24 matches
Mail list logo
