On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:09:43PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
2012/1/20 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 06:25:42PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
I figure this isn't wanted?
You silently ignored part of the notes that were provided,
I fixed the style violations you
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 06:25:42PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
I figure this isn't wanted?
You silently ignored part of the notes that were provided, and keep
complete silence on the primary question about non-standard and fractional
nature of the patch.
I see no reason to retype my previous
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:44:51PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 1/12/12 6:04 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 11. Jan 2012, at 15:06 , Oliver Fromme wrote:
I'm currently looking at the source code of ps, but adding
a field for the FIB isn't as trivial as I
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:01:29AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
This is an implementation of dup3 for FreeBSD:
man page here (with a FreeBSD patch coming soon):
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/dup.2.html
Is this implementation correct? If so any objection to adding this
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:08:40PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:01:29AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
This is an implementation of dup3 for FreeBSD:
man page here (with a FreeBSD patch coming soon):
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/dup.2.html
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:46:57AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
2011/12/28 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 02:53:42PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
2011/12/28 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:23:58PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 28
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:53:19PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
2011/12/29 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:46:57AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
2011/12/28 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 02:53:42PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
2011/12/28
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:23:58PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 28 December 2011 12:21, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au wrote:
On 28/12/2011, at 22:07, Chris Rees wrote:
Is there a simple way to check for existence of a driver? I could
even check for /dev/sndstat, though that
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 02:53:42PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
2011/12/28 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:23:58PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 28 December 2011 12:21, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au wrote:
On 28/12/2011, at 22:07, Chris Rees wrote
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 05:05:04PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
2011/12/27 Giovanni Trematerra giovanni.tremate...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Venkatesh Srinivas
vsrini...@dragonflybsd.org wrote:
Hi!
I've been playing with two things in DragonFly that might be of interest
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 02:02:09PM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote:
Hi.
Is there a way, from userspace, to get the amount of memory a given
process currently has swapped out?
The VM does not track memory 'per process'. Simplifying to the point
where the statement becomes false, it assigns the
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 02:17:43PM +0100, joris dedieu wrote:
2011/12/2 Alexander Kabaev kab...@gmail.com:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 18:22:57 +0100
joris dedieu joris.ded...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Here is a patch I use to prevent loading a shared object from a noexec
mountpoint. It's an
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:47:54PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 20:10:41 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 10:37:46PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~trociny/env.sys.3.patch
KB Oops, I missed this in the previous
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 02:44:55PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:47:54PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 20:10:41 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 10:37:46PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 10:37:46PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 21:45:53 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 08:59:21PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 17:44:43 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB I think that the aux vector
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 11:27:37PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:49:48 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB I think it is better to use sys/elf.h over the machine/elf.h.
KB Please change the comment for PROC_AUXV_MAX to Safety limit on
KB auxv size. Also, it worth adding
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 05:40:22PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 15:58:01 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB +if (error == EFAULT) {
KB +for (i = 0; i len; i++) {
KB +c = fubyte(sptr + i);
KB +if (c
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 08:59:21PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 17:44:43 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB I think that the aux vector must be naturally aligned. You can return
KB ENOEXEC early if vptr is not aligned.
Not sure I see what you mean. vptr for auxv
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 09:07:11AM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:49:48 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB For PROC_ARG and PROC_ENV, you blindly trust the read values of the arg
and
KB env vector sizes. This can easily cause kernel panics due to unability to
KB
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 01:32:39PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:24:51 +0300 Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:13:10AM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:10:05 +0300 Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB In my opinion, the way
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:54:42PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:49:48 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 01:32:39PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
What do you think about the attached patch? This is a kernel
part. COMPAT_FREEBSD32 has
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 06:54:51PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
So, I have question: what should I do if I need to perofrm ONE
action, which could block for some time (for example, open file or
create ALQ)?
I could create thread for this. But it looks strange and too heavy: create
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:31:43AM +0200, Daniel Grech wrote:
Hi,
I am allocating memory from a device driver in the kernel and passing it on
to another driver. In the other driver it is neccessary for me to determine
whether the address passed is from user space or kernel space as this
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 05:02:00PM +0400, Alexandr Matveev wrote:
Hi,
We are using FreeBSD 8.2 on our servers for high load projects.
When I was preparing system for production I saw strange (as I think)
behavior,
that leads to increased load on servers.
If I made truss on httpd
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:13:10AM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:10:05 +0300 Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB In my opinion, the way to implement the feature is to (re)use
KB linprocfs_doargv() and provide another kern.proc sysctl to retrieve the
KB argv and env vectors
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 07:57:57PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
Hi,
I have a patch that makes kvm_uread() read from user space using ptrace(2).
http://people.freebsd.org/~trociny/kvm_uread.ptrace.patch
With this change 'ps -e' does not requires procfs(5).
Do you like it or there might
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 01:44:37AM +0200, Harald Servat wrote:
Dear hackers,
does anyone know if I can measure power consumption of the processor via
software by using FreeBSD on a Intel Core i5? Any pointer on this, or other
architectures, will be welcome.
Thank you very much in
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 04:41:45PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i have few questions.
1) suppose i map 1TB of address space as anonymous and touch just one
page. how much memory is used to manage this?
I am not sure how deep the enumeration you want to know, but the first
approximation will
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 04:21:09PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-hackers.
Here are several memory-allocation mechanisms in the kernel. The two
I'm aware of is MALLOC_DEFINE()/malloc()/free() and uma_* (zone(9)).
As far as I understand, malloc() is general-purpose, but it
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:30:06AM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
You might be interested in this PR:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153157cat=
This does the same thing for userland .symbols files, and teaches gdb
how to find them.
The patch is not committable as is. In particular,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:50:47AM +0800, Thinker K.F. Li wrote:
Hi Guys,
I was in trouble for an issue of TLS implementation of FreeBSD. It is
an issue of ld-elf.so actually. If I have a thread-local variable in
program, the value of the variable is not consistent after an
dlopen(). For
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:48:42AM +0200, Marc L?rner wrote:
Hello,
what about changing order of callout_reset and uprintf?
And your timeout isn't 1minute, it's one second!
Regards,
Marc
I already did that to ensure timer_event_handler would be called correctly.
The result follows:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:16:09PM -0600, Charlie Martin wrote:
We're having a crash in some internal code running on FreeBSD 7.2
(specifically 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE and yeah, I know
it's quite a bit behind) in which after 18-30 hours of running load
tests, the code panics
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 05:12:09PM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:16:09PM -0600, Charlie Martin wrote:
We're having a crash in some internal code running on FreeBSD 7.2
(specifically 7.2
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:21:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[skip]
But I also would like to use this opportunity to discuss how we can
make it easier to debug such issue as this. I think that this problem
demonstrates that when we treat certain junk in kernel address value
as a userland
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:02:19AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
I'm working on adding security methods to camcontrol and have
come up against a strange issue. It seems that the timeout
value for cam, at least on ata (ahci), is limited to less than
2148 seconds.
This can be seen by
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 06:56:51PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/7/30 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
Second, my proposal contains a flaw. Namely, if some swap device was removed
between calls to swap_info and swap_devname calls, we get mangled list.
Ok, I see that you fixed
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:06:48AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Hi Kostik,
2011/7/29 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
The patch is too hackish, IMHO.
I would prefer to have an exported kernel function that fills xswdev
by index, used both by vm_swap_info and linprocfs
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 01:15:59AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Please consider this patch, it implements Linux-like /proc/swaps for
linprocfs.
E.g.
$ cat /proc/swaps
FilenameTypeSizeUsed
Priority
/dev/zvol/dimoni/swap
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:03:35PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 06:31:36PM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote:
2011/7/25 Andrey V. Elsukov bu7c...@yandex.ru:
On 25.07.2011 10:18, Joe Sciulli wrote:
Is it possible to mount virtualbox vdi file on the FreeBSD host? This
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:35:44PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:22:34AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:03:35PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 06:31:36PM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote:
2011/7/25 Andrey V. Elsukov bu7c
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:16:28AM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
Seems this interface be acceptable ?
Looks good to me.
The proposed code changes are in the attached patch.
Proposed wording of addition into RFORK(2):
Below is the patch I intend to commit after you retest it.
I added the
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 04:36:24PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
Below is the patch I intend to commit after you retest it.
I applied it against our 8.2 based package,
altered our clone to use this new
interface and run eglibc testsuite. No regression.
Our runtime detection of this new
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:53:05PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
I will bump revision for stable/8 when merging, but I do not see much
reason to bump on HEAD right now.
Many thanks.
Uhm I think we can survive without a bump in HEAD. For now we will
need to keep our backward-compatibility
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:54:06PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
This patch made by Petr Salinger improves compatibility with
LinuxThreads in rfork() syscall. The Linux clone() implementation
allows specifying the signal sent to parent when child terminates
(instead of SIGCHLD).
As the
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 03:27:56PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
This patch made by Petr Salinger improves compatibility with
LinuxThreads in rfork() syscall. The Linux clone() implementation
allows specifying the signal sent to parent when child terminates
(instead of SIGCHLD).
As the
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:23:36PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
Can you, please, describe the reasoning behind the
+ if (sig == SIGCHLD) sig = 0;
line ?
The main reason is backward compatibility.
The original FreeBSD code allows only to select between
SIGUSR1 or SIGCHLD signals.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:50:44PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
RFLINUXPTH was used by the linuxthreads port, that was popular in the
time of FreeBSD 4.x and may be 5.x to run mysql. I will object against
this breakage.
Do I understand correctly that API/ABI backward compatibility with
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 05:43:23PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
The 1st patch satisfies this. I agree that SIGCHLD part
is not easily readable.
The SIGCHLD part is ugly. This is why I am asking about possible ways
to overcome this.
We need a way to specify no signal.
It can be new flag or
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 06:12:15PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
I would instead use a new flag to specify a signal sent on the child
death. Like RFTSIGZMB. If flag is not set, SIGCHLD is used. If it is
set, the bit slice is used as signal number, 0 means do not send any
signal.
Please note
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 08:05:56PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
Should the bit slice be 7 or 8 bits ?
I propose to go 8 bits, and add the check to be future-proof.
It seems that we already parse GNU/kFreeBSD brandnote. I think this
could be used to distinguish between old behaviour, that is
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 01:47:38PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On arm, ia64, powerpc and sparc, Linux doesn't define a static
PAGE_SIZE. It can only be obtained via sysconf(). In addition,
GNU/Hurd doesn't define PAGE_SIZE at all.
This patch improves portability of libsbuf to be built on
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 02:07:59PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/7/3 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
I think the different workaround is already included in the latest
sbuf source. Please see
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/kern/subr_sbuf.c?revision=222015view=markup
How
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:47:38PM -0700, Artem Belevich wrote:
Jack,
Quite a while back you've posted I/OAT driver. Unfortunately the link
you posted does not seem to have the drivers any more. Do you still
have them available somewhere?
Do you know if Intel has technical info on the DMA
.html
continued...
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2010-September/033028.html
continued...
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2010-November/033478.html
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:47:02PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 07:00:23PM -0400
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:50:30AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 8:31:15 am Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 5/18/11, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:03:07AM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 04:03:26PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:17:12PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 12:56:40 -0700 Sean Bruno sean...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Silly thing I ran into today. User wanted to NFS mount a dir inside a
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:03:07AM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Fenghua Yu fenghua...@intel.com
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:34:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] x86, head_32/64.S: Enable SMEP
To: Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu, Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:38:12AM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-hackers.
Does FreeBSD have some custom call, which can be used where Linux
programs uses posix_fadvice() and DARWIN ones fcntl(F_RDADVISE)?
It is like madvise(2) but for file descriptors.
No, it does not
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:44:32AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, May 03, 2011 9:10:26 am Philip Soeberg wrote:
Hi fellow FreeBSD hackers,
I've been using the following poor-man's approach in my driver init for
ages in an attempt at detecting PAE option on BSD 6 (or greater)
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:22:43PM +0200, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
Err, if you use cdevpriv you shouldn't even have a d_close method. All
your
d_close logic should be in the cdevpriv destructor
I see. There is no documentation for any of this, so I just implemented
it in the way I
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:14:36PM +0200, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
If you have some sort of state that needs to get created on first
open and then removed on last close [...] I would still depend on the
cdevpriv destructor and use a reference count between open() and the
destructor to know
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:14:49AM +0200, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
Indeed, I may have mixed up terminology. Sorry about that. What I am
doing (or trying to do) is very simple:
There is a single physical USB device. I have a single device node
representing it. This device can be opened
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:38:30PM +0200, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
You need to handle all cases in your driver. Fortunately there exists a
solution for this already, called USB cdev. See
I went through all the USB drivers with a fine comb (the driver I am
porting was based on the old USB
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 03:49:48PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
Hi,
I should know the answer to this, but... When reading a global kernel
variable, where its modifications are protected by a mutex, is it
necessary to get the mutex lock to just read its value?
For example:
Aif
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 07:40:14PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
Hi all,
I've got an xbox running at my parents' house as a backup MX, among
other things.
Ages ago I updated it from 7.2 - 8.1, and I ended up with no end of
trouble, and finished by restoring a backup. I emailed rink@, although
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 08:54:18PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Jesse Smith wrote:
I'm interested in working on the Port prebind from OpenBSD project
mentioned on the FreeBSD Ideas page. (
http://wiki.freebsd.org/IdeasPage#head-d28cdd95ca1755d5afe63d653cb4926d4bdc99de
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:16:46PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2011-Mar-25 08:18:38 -0400, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
For modern Intel CPUs you can just assume that the TSCs are in sync across
packages. They also have invariant TSC's meaning that the frequency doesn't
change.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:12:32AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, March 26, 2011 08:16:46 am Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2011-Mar-25 08:18:38 -0400, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
For modern Intel CPUs you can just assume that the TSCs are in sync across
packages. They also have
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:11:04AM -0700, Matthew Fleming wrote:
How can I tell if the Northbridge on a machine has a built-in DMA
controller? And if it does, what device would I use to control it?
I ask because I'm working with a PCI card that has a 36-bit physical
address limit, and that
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:39:58PM +0800, Xingxing Pan wrote:
2011/3/22 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 08:32:04PM +0300, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 05:36:13PM +0800, Xingxing Pan wrote:
2011/3/21 Chagin Dmitry dcha...@freebsd.org
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:55:59AM -0700, Matthew Fleming wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:11:04AM -0700, Matthew Fleming wrote:
How can I tell if the Northbridge on a machine has a built-in DMA
controller
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 08:32:04PM +0300, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 05:36:13PM +0800, Xingxing Pan wrote:
2011/3/21 Chagin Dmitry dcha...@freebsd.org:
powerfull script.
Xingxing Pan
hmm, which script? I think enough amd64, i386 and amd64/ia32.
I suggest
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:26:53PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
...
- set cputicker() has some design bugs. It assumes that the tick frequency
is the same across all CPUs, but the TSC is per-CPU. I have an old SMP
system with CPUs of different frequency that can demonstrate bugs from
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:51:27PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/03/2011 15:56 Kostik Belousov said the following:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:26:53PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
...
- set cputicker() has some design bugs. It assumes that the tick frequency
is the same across all CPUs
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 02:09:58PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Friday 18 March 2011 01:05 pm, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Kostik Belousov wrote:
We definitely do not support configurations with different
models of CPUs in SMP
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:56:14PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Mar 16), Thiago Damas said:
Hi,
without procfs, there is a way to get usertime and systime from a
running process?
Try applying the attached patch to ps. I've had it for a while but never
submitted a
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:30:00PM -0700, Ravi Murty wrote:
I haven't, are there specific improvements in this area of the kernel?
First, the 8.2, compared to 8.0, changed the mechanism of delivering
the process-global signal to a thread. Now, the thread to deliver is
selected at the moment of
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:19:01PM -0300, Danilo Egea wrote:
The problem is the binutils version, the port try to use the
binutils-2.21. With the binutils-2.15 (native of the system) works fine.
Rather, it is binutils 2.15 silently creating broken library.
2.21 refuses to do it.
Some object
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:24:05PM +0900, mmats...@cybernet.co.jp wrote:
From: Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:04:24 -0800
::On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:54 PM, mmats...@cybernet.co.jp wrote:
:: From: Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org
:: Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:58:32PM -0800, Yuri wrote:
On 02/21/2011 15:38, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
That's a major difference. The Linux people decided a while ago that
stack alignment should be 16 Byte. GCC effectively forces that down
everyone's throat because until at least GCC 4.2 or 4.3,
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 01:06:38PM -0500, Ben Kaduk wrote:
[replying to the MFC that triggered the connection]
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Bruce Cran bru...@freebsd.org wrote:
Author: brucec
Date: Tue Feb 22 17:38:43 2011
New Revision: 218953
URL:
://people.freebsd.org/~nox/dvb/linux-dvb-8.patch
(for 8.)
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:54:48AM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:51:05PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 09:10:00PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
Hi!
I was kinda hoping to be able to post
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:50:06AM +0100, Mats Lindberg wrote:
All,
I have been using a small program /rt) that utilize the sched_setscheduler()
syscall to set the scheduling policy of a process to SCHED_RR. Been running
it FBSD 5.x and 6.x. Now when migrating to FBSD 8.1 I get EPERM back at
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 03:58:05AM -0800, Dr. Baud wrote:
First, do you have a console output during the run ? Is it possible
that machine paniced ? If not, were there any kernel messages before
reboot ?
Second, what is the process you are dumping ? Can you show at least
the
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:46:05AM -0800, Dr. Baud wrote:
I've an interesting anomaly I'd appreciate some help with.
As a result of looking at a threading problem I modified gcore
to dump all memory segments associated with a process;
basically comment out the Ignore conditional in
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 12:42:15AM +0200, Ali Polatel wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm the developer of pinktrace - http://dev.exherbo.org/~alip/pinktrace/
- a simple ptrace() wrapper library for FreeBSD and Linux. I have set up
a FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT VM today to test various new features recently
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 01:49:52AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 12:42:15AM +0200, Ali Polatel wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm the developer of pinktrace - http://dev.exherbo.org/~alip/pinktrace/
- a simple ptrace() wrapper library for FreeBSD and Linux. I have set up
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:54:48AM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:51:05PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 09:10:00PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
Hi!
I was kinda hoping to be able to post a correct patch in public but
getting an answer
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 09:10:00PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
Hi!
I was kinda hoping to be able to post a correct patch in public but
getting an answer to ${Subject} seems to be more difficult than I
thought... :) So, does anyone here know? copyout_map() and
You do not need Giant locked
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:37:22AM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote:
It's in the the subversion tree, under projects/jailconf.
I've got the dependency stuff there (actually turns out to be a large
chunk of the code). I've got it doing almost everything that rc.d/jail
does now, though it doesn't
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37:54PM -0500, Mark Saad wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:05 AM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday 26 January 2011 06:49:11 Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:40:42 -0500
Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org wrote:
Hello
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:50:48PM +, Devin Teske wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 22:31 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37:54PM -0500, Mark Saad wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:05 AM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday 26 January
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:12:34PM +, Devin Teske wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 22:59 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:50:48PM +, Devin Teske wrote:
Probably did something like this:
time sh -c '( firefox ); sleep 1000'
and then pressed
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:44:13PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, January 21, 2011 11:09:10 am Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
Hello.
Some time ago I faced with a problem booting with 400GB physmem.
The problem is that vm.max_proc_mmap type overflows with
such high value, and that
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:58:26PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Sunday 16 January 2011 13:30:33 Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net
wrote:
On Sunday 16 January 2011 13:20:39 Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:19:22AM -0500, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Are you talking about BSDoid or FreeDroid?
I got SDK from http://bsdroid.org. No idea what FreeDroid is.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:58:26PM +0100, Hans
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 04:34:22PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
On 01/13/2011 13:28, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:19:00PM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
I've been trying to get an application compiled with gcc 4.5.1 running
on FreeBSD 8.1, but it's been crashing during startup
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:19:00PM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
I've been trying to get an application compiled with gcc 4.5.1 running
on FreeBSD 8.1, but it's been crashing during startup with a SIGBUS.
It turns out that the problem is that gcc is issuing SSE
instructions(in my case, a movdqa)
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:57:15PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:19:00PM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
I've been trying to get an application compiled with gcc 4.5.1 running
on FreeBSD 8.1, but it's been crashing during startup with a SIGBUS.
It turns out that the
1 - 100 of 367 matches
Mail list logo
