On May 29, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
Hi all!
Back in 2005, when Alexander Leidinger wrote the make delete-old
target, he documented the order of upgrade such that it should be run
before mergemaster [1];
# 7. `make installworld'
# 8. `make delete-old'
# 9.
[[ summarizing a conversation in irc ]]
The below fragment doesn't match UPDATING. Since I don't think the order
matters; and since we've had no reports that UPDATING is wrong; and since I
think way more people follow updating than the Makefile; we should fix the
makefile and make the docs
On Apr 2, 2013, at 4:10 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no wrote:
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl writes:
Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org writes:
It is not exact so. Some Atoms on some motherboards with some
On Apr 2, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Chris BeHanna wrote:
Goodness gracious, did no one see the date on the original post?
What's the limit on this fishing hole?
Three internet Trolls, two wise old owls and a april fool in a pear tree from
the looks of it.
Warner
On Mar 31, 2013, at 11:48 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
I think the only ones who are going to object are the users of embedded
hardware. Some of them are still using CPUs that are only i586 equivalent.
Personally I support the notion.
-Kimmo
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Eitan Adler
On Apr 1, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
From: Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 00:48:08 -0400
Subject: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture
To: freebsd-a...@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Hackers
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
How does 'set remotebaud' not do what you want?
Warner
On Jan 15, 2013, at 10:15 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
There doesn't seem to be a blessed way to set the baudrate from inside
gdb/kgdb. It seems to be set from '-b' on the command line.
However kgdb doesn't have this support.
This
On Jan 16, 2013, at 9:05 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Jan 16, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
How does 'set remotebaud' not do what you want?
Warner
On Jan 15, 2013, at 10:15 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
There doesn't seem to be a blessed way to set
On Dec 5, 2012, at 9:42 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, December 04, 2012 2:41:32 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:52 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hmm, I certainly see the module directories being built in parallel. Some
of
the make jobs may not be as
On Dec 4, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Myles C. Maxfield wrote:
Hello, all,
I'm interested in learning about the internals of how libc works, so I was
hoping to link a test application with a version of libc that has debugging
symbols (reading the raw sources only gets me so far). The version of libc
On Nov 15, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
On 11/15/12, Ian Lepore free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 22:15 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi all,
When debugging and writing wireless drivers/stack code, I like to
sprinkle lots of locking assertions everywhere.
On Nov 3, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 20:41 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 12:38:39PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
In an attempt to un-hijack the thread about memory usage increase
between 6.4 and 9.x, I'm starting a new thread here
On Oct 26, 2012, at 12:23 AM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
In particular, why cannot the ':L' and ':U' support be added ?
Because they already exist - with different meanings.
They were added to NetBSD make over 10 years ago, from the OSF version
of pmake.
And we've had the :U and :L for a
On Oct 26, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 08:27:06 -0600, Warner Losh writes:
And we've had the :U and :L for a similar period of time as well. =
Sorry, I didn't mean to imply age has anything to do with it.
The doc I refered to makes it clear
On Oct 26, 2012, at 12:11 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:12:44AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Do be able to get the ports tree working with bmake asap, I also asked
him to MFC it to 9.1, from latest reply he got positive answer from re@
about this, but was waiting
On Oct 5, 2012, at 10:08 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, October 04, 2012 1:20:52 pm Carl Delsey wrote:
I noticed that the bus_space_*_8 functions are unimplemented for x86.
Looking at the code, it seems this is intentional.
Is this done because on 32-bit systems we don't know, in
On Oct 9, 2012, at 4:46 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
[snip]
any fix?
You have found the fix. Remove the WITHOUT_ options from the build
that keep it from completing. You'll be able to add them at installworld
time w/o a hassle. nanobsd uses this to keep things down, while still
On Sep 4, 2012, at 10:05 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, September 02, 2012 5:31:21 pm Aleksander Dutkowski wrote:
hello!
I have PMIC (TWL4030) module connected to the SoC (ARM/OMAP3) via i2c
(iicbus).
Current solution is that i2c_attach calls bus_generic_attach(dev);
which calls my
http://people.freebsd.org/~imp/MALLOC_DEBUG.diff
This makes WITH/WITHOUT_MALLOC_DEBUG work. The non-standard PRODUCTION_MALLOC
form is retained for compatibility. This also needs to be documented.
Comments?
Warner
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
On Aug 22, 2012, at 6:02 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 12:34:42 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
What about just creating an ETHER_ADDR_COPY(dst, src) and putting that
in a relevant include file, then hide the ugliness there?
The same benefits will likely appear when
On Aug 21, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 08/21/12 08:44, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 4:49:30 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:32:41PM -0600, Dan McGregor wrote:
Hi.
I've been working on porting compiler-rt/clang's support for
On Aug 22, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 22 August 2012 05:02, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 12:34:42 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
What about just creating an ETHER_ADDR_COPY(dst, src) and putting that
in a relevant include file, then hide the
On Aug 21, 2012, at 5:26 AM, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:20:29PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Aug 20, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
or use ++.
i think it is always aligned to 2 bytes and this should produce usable
code on any CPU? should be 6
On Aug 21, 2012, at 1:42 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Even without this tagging, the code to do a structure level copy of 6 bytes
is going to be tiny...
true.
just to make sure it will be absolutely portable how about
bcopymacaddress(dst,src)
and then define it whatever you find
On Aug 20, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Mitya wrote:
Hi.
I found some overhead code in /src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c and
/src/sys/netgraph/ng_ether.c
It contains strings, like bcopy(src, dst, ETHER_ADDR_LEN);
When src and dst are struct ether_addr*, and ETHER_ADDR_LEN equal 6.
This code call every
On Aug 20, 2012, at 10:48 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__amd64__)
*dst = *src;
#else
bcopy(src, dst, ETHER_ADDR_LEN);
#else
short *tmp1=((*short)src),*tmp2=((*short)dst);
*tmp2=*tmp1; *(tmp2+1)=*(tmp1+1); *(tmp2+2)=*(tmp1+2);
or use ++.
i think it
On Aug 20, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
or use ++.
i think it is always aligned to 2 bytes and this should produce usable code
on any CPU? should be 6 instructions on MIPS and PPC IMHO.
We should tag it as __aligned(2) then, no? If so, then the compiler should
generate
On Aug 10, 2012, at 6:10 PM, George Mitchell wrote:
On 08/10/12 18:49, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Try to ktrace the binaries to see what is going on. I suspect that
sources for 1.1.5 are not in our cvs/svn, so it is troublesome to
say anuthing without ktrace dump.
Not that I need it, but I
All these changes look good. Since they aren't changes to lex itself, but how
the base uses standard lex interfaces, I'd say we should just commit it.
Warner
On Aug 8, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Dan McGregor wrote:
Hi.
I was just noticing that mkcsmapper doesn't build with clang. I saw two
ways
On Aug 5, 2012, at 8:36 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i am looking for SMALL and specifically low power board that can run from
battery, can run FreeBSD and have at least one ethernet and one USB port, and
reasonable amount of memory (32MB at least).
WiFi not needed. some more than few MB
On Aug 2, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
Those all sound like nice steps forward, thank you for pointing them
out. Nothing would make me happier than to be proven wrong in this area.
What would be nice I think would be if these steps were formalized, and
shared more openly. Having
On Aug 1, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Any interested party is very welcome to approach a developer and get
added to the developer summits. Plenty of the people at the most
recent developer summit
On Aug 1, 2012, at 9:28 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
On Aug 1, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Any interested party is very welcome
On Jul 31, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
[...] We lack that right now, which is why you're trying to shoe-horn the
FDT connections into a newbus world and complaining that everything sucks
because
, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
[..]
Honestly, though, I think you'll be more pissed when you find out that
the N:1 interface that you want is being done in the wrong domain. But I've
been wrong before and look forward to seeing your replacement.
I will just pass function
On Jul 25, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
BTW, I think that it would be nice if the GEOM work-processing could re-use
the
CAM model.
That is, try to execute GEOM bio transformations in the original thread as
much
as possible, defer work to the GEOM thread as the last resort.
Lots
On Jul 24, 2012, at 6:40 PM, Paul Ambrose wrote:
#define PAGE_SHIFT 12
#define PAGE_SIZE (1PAGE_SHIFT)
#define KSTACK_PAGES 2
#define KSTACK_GUARD_PAGES 2
I had a MIPS machine (Loongson 3A) with page size 16KB( could be 4KB, but
had to handle cache alias in OS), IMHO, define
On Jul 21, 2012, at 5:50 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi all,
I found this in stable/9. I think it's also a problem in -HEAD.
Would someone with PCI bus clue take a look ?
I'll be happy to look at it... just as soon as I get a laptop that
suspends/resumes with a cardbus slot to test it
On Jul 12, 2012, at 6:01 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
New-bus is certainly not the only way to organize a device hierarchy and is
not perfect, but in your case I suggest you tone down your language until you
have enough information to develop an informed opinion.
It is also not the only way to
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:47 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:31 PM
On Jul 8, 2012, at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Ok, yet another Newbus' limitation. Assuming a device exports more
than one interface, and one of its child has need to use more than one
interface, each interfaces cannot register, concurrently, its own
ivar. While I try to always have a
On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
On Jul 8, 2012, at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Ok, yet another Newbus' limitation. Assuming a device exports more
than one interface, and one of its child has
On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
On Jul 8, 2012, at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe
On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:59 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
On Jul 8, 2012, at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Ok, yet another Newbus' limitation. Assuming a device exports more
than one interface, and one of its child has
On Jul 7, 2012, at 6:25 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 06.07.2012 um 17:33 schrieb Arnaud Lacombe:
I assume you are talking about devclass_get_device()/device_find_child().
That's neither correct nor robust in a couple of way:
1) you have no guarantee a device unit will always give you the
On Jul 6, 2012, at 1:09 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
Just blue-sky dreaming here on the fly... what we really have is a
resource-management problem. A device comes along that needs a GPIO
resource, how does it find and use that resource?
I rather like that idea. The connection between devices is
On Jul 7, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Garrett Wollman wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 16:17:53 -0700, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org said:
BIND in the base today comes with a full-featured local resolver
configuration, which I'm confident that Dag-Erling can do for unbound
(and which I would be glad to
On Jul 7, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Ian Lepore
free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:45 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Ian Lepore
free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote:
On Fri,
On Jul 6, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
The system should be optimized for new users by default. Whether this
means enabling or disabling a feature is feature-specific.
with such attitude it will not take long to turn FreeBSD to useless thing,
not really different from linux
On Jul 6, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
That's neither correct nor robust in a couple of way:
1) you have no guarantee a device unit will always give you the same
resource.
this raises the following
On Jul 4, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/04/2012 15:01, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 14:19:38 -0700
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 07/04/2012 11:51, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
What would be really nice here is a command wrapper hooked into the
shell so that when
On Jul 5, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 7/5/12 6:38 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
inexperienced users.
Having to enable it manually defeats its very purpose.
so is FreeBSD future direction to be moron-OS just like linux is now, or
is that just another stupid idea on that
On Jul 5, 2012, at 5:14 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi folks,
The problem has been raised in the last BSDCan during a talk, but no
clear answer has been given. Some (pseudo-)devices might require
resources from multiple other (pseudo-)devices.
For example, a device is sitting on an SMBus,
On May 31, 2012, at 9:54 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, May 31, 2012 4:19:46 am Norbert Koch wrote:
Hello,
I have written a bus device driver
which itself is a pci driver. Child devices
may allocate resources from my bus device.
My bus device does the usual
management of
Hi Svatopluk,
That looks very interesting.
You may be interested in the efforts of various people to bring up the armv6
multi-core boards.
You can checkout the source from http://svn.freebsd.org/base/projects/armv6 to
see where we are in that effort. I believe that many of these issues have
On Jan 17, 2012, at 11:12 AM, John Kozubik wrote:
Again, I'm not suggesting more snapshots - I am suggesting more real, bona
fide releases. This will help people.
I tend to agree with you. Our release engineering process isn't serving the
needs of users as much as it once did. When Walnut
On Nov 21, 2011, at 9:26 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, November 18, 2011 11:48:20 am Paul B. Mahol wrote:
Hi,
Is there nice way in FreeBSD to force reprobe of devices for specific
driver like it is done when kernel module is loaded (via
DRIVER_MODULE(...) stuff)?
Note that those
On Jul 20, 2011, at 9:13 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
I think this is a harder problem than you expect. It is not just the crt
files
that matter, but every library. You would need CPU-specific versions of every
static library on the build system, and possibly you would want to do this for
all
I know this is a little late, but...
On Jul 5, 2011, at 2:12 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:05:27PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
I agree with all of the above reasons, but none of them change the fact
that __linux__ is used left and right to identify both kernel and
On Jul 5, 2011, at 7:36 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/7/5 Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org:
As far as I can see, this code only gives warnings when compiled with
gcc 4.5 or higher, and when using the -Wundef flag. Isn't it easier to
just remove the -Wundef flag here?
Here's a patch to
Why on earth would you want this?
Warner
On Jul 7, 2011, at 2:31 AM, grarpamp wrote:
possibly achievable in libc?
I don't know. Where else would it be done?
stat, utimes, gettimeofday, clock_gettime,
adjtime, etc and their variations.
I've not checked what currently happens, but I
On Jun 24, 2011, at 7:11 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Friday 24 June 2011 14:59:37 Robert Millan wrote:
2011/6/24 Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net:
Very nice. But why not use variable names instead of hardcoding
numbers? It makes the output much easier to understand.
To save
How'd you go about generating all these .conf files?
I don't see where you defined USB_* as variables in them either. Maybe you
could point me at it?
Warner
On Jun 23, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
usb.diff
___
On Jun 21, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (16/06/2011 22:35), Russell Cattelan wrote:
On 6/16/11 3:06 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (16/06/2011 13:32), Russell Cattelan wrote:
I have been contacted about possibly implementing a fast reboot
mechanism for FreeBSD similar to kexec on
On Jun 20, 2011, at 6:49 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, June 19, 2011 12:35:49 pm Ansar Mohammed wrote:
I appreciate that. The system works fine with NetBSD, LInux and Windows XP,
so I doubt its hardware.
Interesting though that OpenBSD has the same issue.
A question about the debug
I like it. I think we should get it in ASAP.
Warner
On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
Hi all,
Macros are being tested for bsd.port.mk that use a new class of files,
in the same vein as the BINOWN variables I have introduced CONFOWN,
CONFGRP, CONFMODE and CONFDIR.
Please
On Jun 10, 2011, at 6:14 AM, Atom Smasher wrote:
new laptop:
LENOVO, 4313CTO, ThinkPad T510
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 540 @ 2.53GHz
Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) Arrandale
4G RAM (DDR3-10600)
old laptop:
Acer, Navarro, Aspire 5100
AMD Turion(tm) 64 Mobile Technology MK-36
On Jun 5, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
On 05/06/2011 06:03, Warner Losh wrote:
I'd add them for all !_LP64 architectures: arm, mips o32, mips n32, i386,
and powerpc...
Forgive the stupid question, but ... add them to what?
If they aren't already defined by the compilers, those
I'd add them for all !_LP64 architectures: arm, mips o32, mips n32, i386, and
powerpc...
Warner
On Jun 4, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
It turns out that both clang and gcc define _LP64 when used native on amd64.
Neither defines _ILP32 on i386 (native or cross-compiled).
dt_popc()
On May 22, 2011, at 9:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi Warner,
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:47, Warner Losh wrote:
(2) Working clang/LLVM cross-compile of FreeBSD
On May 31, 2011, at 5:07 PM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I am looking into potentially MFC'ing r212367 and related, that adds
drains to sbufs. The reason for MFC is that several pieces of new
code in CURRENT are using the drain functionality and it would make
MFCing those changes much easier.
These look generally good. Just one thing I had a question on:
#
+# Enable FreeBSD kernel-specific printf format specifiers. Also instruct gcc to
+# enable some diagnostics, which make it easier to pinpoint tinderbox failures.
+CFLAGS+= -fformat-extensions -fdiagnostics-show-option
+
On May 27, 2011, at 10:47 AM, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org
To: rank1see...@gmail.com
Cc: hack...@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:47:54 +
Subject: Re: Active slice, only for a next boot
On Fri May 27 11,
On May 27, 2011, at 11:21 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
On 27 May 2011 17:47, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org
To: rank1see...@gmail.com
Cc: hack...@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:47:54 +
Subject: Re: Active slice,
On May 27, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
On Fri May 27 11, Warner Losh wrote:
These look generally good. Just one thing I had a question on:
#
+# Enable FreeBSD kernel-specific printf format specifiers. Also instruct
gcc to
+# enable some diagnostics, which make it easier
The usual reason that vnode_if.h doesn't build for me when I'm doing in-tree
hacking is because make depend hasn't run to generate it yet. Or more
precisely, the arc in the dependency graph from osi_crypto.c to vnode_if.h. I
didn't see that as part of the log, so you might try this first (and
On May 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On May 4, 2011, at 1:37 AM, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
Devin Teske dte...@vicor.com wrote:
Hey all,
Proud to bring you version 1.3 which completes the followup
suggestions made by Olivier Smedts (use autoboot_delay instead of
On May 9, 2011, at 12:30 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 8 May 2011 21:16, Marius Strobl mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote:
[snip]
Depends on what you understand by properly. One idea I particularly
like is to handle switch ports as pseudo-interfaces hanging off of the
the MAC driver parent
On May 8, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Damjan Marion wrote
On May 8, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 07:22:23PM +0200, Damjan Marion wrote:
Yes, my initial idea is to attach manually only to one PHY, but problem
is that either i can attach to PHY12-15 which is reporting
On May 5, 2011, at 7:21 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
hack...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Voras
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 8:00 AM
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [UPDATE] New Boot-Loader
On Apr 28, 2011, at 7:37 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Hartmut Brandt hartmut.bra...@dlr.de
wrote:
I think we can change this, because it would break makefiles that assume
that the entire script is given to the shell in one piece.
I'm not sure to parse that.
Why not both?
duck
Warner
On Apr 29, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:53:11 -0700
Devin Teske dte...@vicor.com wrote:
Hello fellow hackers,
I'd love to finally release (under the BSD license) my code for the revamped
FreeBSD boot loader menu.
Here's a
On Apr 26, 2011, at 7:42 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
- The Giant protection for new-bus should prevent attach/detach from running
concurrently I believe (either that or the USB bus itself should ensure
that the two instances of your device have seperate device_t instances with
separate
On Apr 26, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
If you needs per-file private data for cdev, you would be better served
by cdevpriv(9) KPI. Cloning is too hard to use correctly for such task.
Thanks, I just got that working. To help those going down a similar path in
the future, I
On Apr 23, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Andrew Lankford wrote:
While we're talking about recent MFC's for SATA hardware (works for me, but I
still need the old ata drivers for my cdrom), is anyone out there really
still using the mcd (fbsd 1.0 vintage) and scd (2.0.5) drivers?
mcd and scd are
On Apr 23, 2011, at 5:19 PM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
mcd and scd are ISA-only devices ... They were important for the
386 (now not supported) and 486 machines. Since the 486 machines
in question maxed out at 32MB, and 8.x has trouble running in 32MB
I don't suppose that your driver could cause the hardware to interrupt after a
little time? That would be more resource friendly... Otherwise, 1ms is long
enough that a msleep or tsleep would likely work quite nicely.
Warner
On Apr 11, 2011, at 1:43 PM, dieter...@engineer.com wrote:
On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:08 AM, Sergey Vinogradov wrote:
Hi, hackers.
I have a question: why ipv4 netmask is displayed by ifconfig in hex format?
Isn't dot-decimal notation more human-readable? Will the attached patch break
something in the very bad way?
This is a gratuitous change that would
On Apr 8, 2011, at 9:55 AM, Mike Bristow wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:40:56PM +0400, Sergey Vinogradov wrote:
On 08.04.2011 19:23, Warner Losh wrote:
On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:08 AM, Sergey Vinogradov wrote:
If we really wanted to make it human readable, we'd output 10.2.3.4/24
So, maybe
On Apr 8, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Sergey Vinogradov wrote:
08.04.2011 19:55, Mike Bristow пишет:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:40:56PM +0400, Sergey Vinogradov wrote:
On 08.04.2011 19:23, Warner Losh wrote:
On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:08 AM, Sergey Vinogradov wrote:
If we really wanted to make it human
On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Philip Paeps wrote:
I think we should just go with the new list, but I'll hold off for a bit
to let others object. ;)
+1, just for the fact that our sources are becoming stale. I wonder though
what other OSes like NetBSD/OpenBSD/[Open]Solaris/IlluminOS use
I always wanted to run FreeBSD/xbox, but I never got it going because I never
had the right hacker dongle...
Warner
On Apr 3, 2011, at 12:40 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
Hi all,
I've got an xbox running at my parents' house as a backup MX, among
other things.
Ages ago I updated it from 7.2 -
On Apr 3, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 06:18:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 01/04/2011 18:04 Andrew Duane said the following:
AFAIK, FreeBSD does not really detect read-only media. This was something I
had to add as a small project here at work,
On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:50 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
With respect to my knowledge , no one of the operating systems
has a facility to separate read-only and modifiable parts ...
SunOS 4 had a partial solution to this, by rearranging the FS layout
so that /usr could be mounted
On Apr 2, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
This is a rather nasty hack, though. If we can make it work, we should
probably try using --sysroot instead, or alternatively, -nostdinc
On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:47, Warner Losh wrote:
(2) Working clang/LLVM cross-compile of FreeBSD. This seems like a basic
requirement to adopt clang/LLVM, and as far as I'm aware that's not yet a
resolved issue?
0 work has been done
On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I am looking for error codes that would unambiguously signal that a disk
drive has
readonly or write-protected media and that disk drive has no media at the
moment.
I foresee these error codes being used mostly between disk peripheral
On Apr 1, 2011, at 5:40 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
if (++tempstr = tstr[5])
BTW,
this game with pointers might prevent devstat(3) from work on big-endian.
I'm very curious about your reasoning here.
Warner
On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
This is a rather nasty hack, though. If we can make it work, we should
probably try using --sysroot instead, or alternatively, -nostdinc and
adding include dirs by hand. The same for executable and library search
paths, although I am not
On Mar 28, 2011, at 5:08 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
On Sun Mar 27 11, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 27, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
Replacement Boot-Loader: twitpic.com/4e46ol
NOTE: The final release will have a single-user mode option.
This looks really cool. Nice to see
1 - 100 of 1904 matches
Mail list logo
