Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 22/11/2010 16:24 John Baldwin said the following:
Well, the real solution is actually larger than described in the PR. What you
really want to do is take the logical CPUs offline when they are halted.
Taking a CPU offline should trigger an EVENTHANDLER that various
on 25/11/2010 17:28 John Baldwin said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 22/11/2010 16:24 John Baldwin said the following:
Well, the real solution is actually larger than described in the PR. What
you
really want to do is take the logical CPUs offline when they are halted.
Taking a CPU
2010/11/25 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org:
on 25/11/2010 17:28 John Baldwin said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 22/11/2010 16:24 John Baldwin said the following:
Well, the real solution is actually larger than described in the PR. What
you
really want to do is take the logical CPUs
on 22/11/2010 16:24 John Baldwin said the following:
Well, the real solution is actually larger than described in the PR. What
you
really want to do is take the logical CPUs offline when they are halted.
Taking a CPU offline should trigger an EVENTHANDLER that various bits of code
could
On Saturday, November 20, 2010 4:58:02 pm Garrett Cooper wrote:
Trying to do a complete solution for kern/145385, Andriy has
raised concerns about IRQ mapping to CPUs; while I've have put
together more pieces of the puzzle, I'm a bit confused how I determine
whether or not an IRQ is
Trying to do a complete solution for kern/145385, Andriy has
raised concerns about IRQ mapping to CPUs; while I've have put
together more pieces of the puzzle, I'm a bit confused how I determine
whether or not an IRQ is available for use.
Sure, I could linear probe a series of IRQs, but
6 matches
Mail list logo
