Quoting Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org (from Sat, 12 Feb 2011
19:08:59 + (GMT)):
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:52:48 + (GMT) Robert Watson
rwat...@freebsd.org wrote:
The one comment I'd make is that the MAC case should indicate that
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:52:48 + (GMT) Robert Watson
rwat...@freebsd.org wrote:
The one comment I'd make is that the MAC case should indicate that
The MAC Framework is supported, rather than mandatory access
controls being present -- the presence of the framework doesn't imply
the presence
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:38:06 +0300 Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net writes:
Hi,
during the last GSoC various FEATURE macros where added to the
system. Before committing them, I would like to get some review
(like if macro is in the
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:52:48 + (GMT) Robert Watson
rwat...@freebsd.org wrote:
The one comment I'd make is that the MAC case should indicate that The MAC
Framework is supported, rather than mandatory access controls being
present -- the
Hi,
during the last GSoC various FEATURE macros where added to the system.
Before committing them, I would like to get some review (like if macro
is in the correct file, and for those FEATURES where the description
was not taken from NOTES if the description is OK).
If nobody complains,
On Friday, February 11, 2011 4:30:28 am Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
during the last GSoC various FEATURE macros where added to the system.
Before committing them, I would like to get some review (like if macro
is in the correct file, and for those FEATURES where the description
was
Quoting John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org (from Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:51:52 -0500):
On Friday, February 11, 2011 4:30:28 am Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
during the last GSoC various FEATURE macros where added to the system.
Before committing them, I would like to get some review (like if macro
is
Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net writes:
Hi,
during the last GSoC various FEATURE macros where added to the system.
Before committing them, I would like to get some review (like if macro
is in the correct file, and for those FEATURES where the description
was not taken from NOTES
On 11.02.2011 14:54, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
As a 3rd point (attention bikeshed ahead), having everything as a
FEATURE would give an uniform way of listing what is available or not
(with the benefit to administratively hide parts of it). Needless to
say that this would reduce the amount of
On 11.02.2011 17:38, Anonymous wrote:
Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net writes:
Hi,
during the last GSoC various FEATURE macros where added to the system.
Before committing them, I would like to get some review (like if macro
is in the correct file, and for those FEATURES where
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
during the last GSoC various FEATURE macros where added to the system.
Before committing them, I would like to get some review (like if macro is in
the correct file, and for those FEATURES where the description was not taken
from NOTES if the
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Ilya Bakulin wrote:
When I was beginning this GSoC work, I primarily thought about unifying the
way to determine if particular feature exists in the kernel. Of course there
should be at least one way to check if the feature is available or not (by
definition: if I may use
12 matches
Mail list logo
