Garrett Cooper wrote:
Correct.
BDB 1.85 is also packaged in gnu libc I believe, which makes it a
more portable means for representing databases without external libraries.
AFAIK it was thrown out from GNU libc some time ago (but some
distributions, like Slackware, have added it
Ok, I've run into a strange issue with BDB's hash tables.
Does anyone know what the following means?
db_dump185: seq: Invalid argument
Backstory:
When dumping out a large amount of data it appears that there's an
expected directive which isn't being inserted by Ruby's BDB1.85 facility
into
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Ok, I've run into a strange issue with BDB's hash tables.
Does anyone know what the following means?
db_dump185: seq: Invalid argument
Backstory:
When dumping out a large amount of data it appears that there's an
expected directive which isn't being inserted by Ruby's
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (May 20), Sean Bryant said:
Just a personal curiosity. Is there a particular reason why FreeBSD
is holding on to BDB 1.85?
All later versions have a non-BSD license (a source redistribution
requirement was added), which means it can't go in the base
In the last episode (May 20), Sean Bryant said:
Just a personal curiosity. Is there a particular reason why FreeBSD
is holding on to BDB 1.85?
All later versions have a non-BSD license (a source redistribution
requirement was added), which means it can't go in the base system.
BDB is built
5 matches
Mail list logo
