Jamie Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 4 Jul 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote:
There are two special cases- of bracket expressions: the
bracket expressions `[[::]]' and `[[::]]' match the null
string at the beginning and end of a word respectively.
Perhaps this
On 7 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Jamie Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 4 Jul 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote:
There are two special cases- of bracket expressions: the
bracket expressions `[[::]]' and `[[::]]' match the null
string at the beginning
BTW, the end-of-line handling is wrong; grep will fail to select a
line where the pattern appears at the end and the line is not
terminated by a newline. I'm working on a fix (and on implementing my
solution for -w and -x).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send
Jamie Howard howar...@wam.umd.edu writes:
On Sun, 4 Jul 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote:
There are two special cases- of bracket expressions: the
bracket expressions `[[::]]' and `[[::]]' match the null
string at the beginning and end of a word respectively.
Perhaps this
On 7 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Jamie Howard howar...@wam.umd.edu writes:
On Sun, 4 Jul 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote:
There are two special cases- of bracket expressions: the
bracket expressions `[[::]]' and `[[::]]' match the null
string at the beginning
Jamie Howard howar...@wam.umd.edu writes:
I am not the internationalization expert, but doesn't [^A-Za-z] and
[A-Xa-z$] limit you to just English and other Roman languages? Won't
[[::]] and [[::]] be languages independent, presuming regex supports
it?
They don't DTRT. They only match
BTW, the end-of-line handling is wrong; grep will fail to select a
line where the pattern appears at the end and the line is not
terminated by a newline. I'm working on a fix (and on implementing my
solution for -w and -x).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe:
Jamie Howard writes:
Perhaps this will help with -w?
Yes, I received a patch from Simon Burge which implements this. It also
beats using [^A-Za-z] and [A-Za-z$] as I was and GNU grep does. I am
still having trouble with -x though. It turns out that even if I specify
a commandline with
Jamie Howard writes:
Perhaps this will help with -w?
Yes, I received a patch from Simon Burge which implements this. It also
beats using [^A-Za-z] and [A-Za-z$] as I was and GNU grep does. I am
still having trouble with -x though. It turns out that even if I specify
a commandline with
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote:
Are you sure you're stripping out the newline and carriage return?
You know, that did it.
I'l put together another version tonight incorporating all the bug fixes
and suggestions I have received over the past few days. More on that
shortly.
Jamie
Hello!
On Sat, Jul 03, 1999 at 05:00:41PM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:
[...]
Hm. Adding ^ and $ should work, provided you don't specify either
REG_NOTBOL or REG_NOTEOL. (I assume that (foo) above, including the parens,
is the RE. With the parens, it depends whether you're using standard
Jamie Howard writes:
Perhaps this will help with -w?
Yes, I received a patch from Simon Burge which implements this. It also
beats using [^A-Za-z] and [A-Za-z$] as I was and GNU grep does. I am
still having trouble with -x though. It turns out that even if I specify
a commandline with
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote:
Are you sure you're stripping out the newline and carriage return?
You know, that did it.
I'l put together another version tonight incorporating all the bug fixes
and suggestions I have received over the past few days. More on that
shortly.
Jamie
Jamie Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I made the version in FreeBSD 4.0 my target except for -A num, -B num, -C,
-num, and -Z. These are not required by the Single Unix Specification or
POSIX and I felt they would bloat my code too significantly.
I find those quite useful, and I don't see
Jamie Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All of the code is original except for binary.c. It is used with the -a
option to prevent searching binary files. binary.c is extricated from
less-332's binary checking code. I was just that lazy.
Less's binary checking code is a tad too strict. It
On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 02:09:47PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
This should be trivial to translate to C. The only non-trivial part of
implementing this stuff is that you have to trick getopt() to make
-num work. You'll have to put a : at the start of your getopt()
string and examine
On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 02:13:13PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Jamie Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All of the code is original except for binary.c. It is used with the -a
option to prevent searching binary files. binary.c is extricated from
less-332's binary checking code. I
Jamie Howard howar...@wam.umd.edu writes:
I made the version in FreeBSD 4.0 my target except for -A num, -B num, -C,
-num, and -Z. These are not required by the Single Unix Specification or
POSIX and I felt they would bloat my code too significantly.
I find those quite useful, and I don't
Jamie Howard howar...@wam.umd.edu writes:
All of the code is original except for binary.c. It is used with the -a
option to prevent searching binary files. binary.c is extricated from
less-332's binary checking code. I was just that lazy.
Less's binary checking code is a tad too strict. It
On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 02:09:47PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
This should be trivial to translate to C. The only non-trivial part of
implementing this stuff is that you have to trick getopt() to make
-num work. You'll have to put a : at the start of your getopt()
string and examine
On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 02:13:13PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Jamie Howard howar...@wam.umd.edu writes:
All of the code is original except for binary.c. It is used with the -a
option to prevent searching binary files. binary.c is extricated from
less-332's binary checking code. I
Jamie Howard writes:
Now, I am having a problem though. I cannot figure out how to implement
-w and -x. For -x, I tried modifying the regular expression (foo) into
^(foo)$ before compiling, but that did not work. I intended to do
something similar with -w. Anyway, I am probably missing the
On Sun, 4 Jul 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote:
There are two special cases- of bracket expressions: the
bracket expressions `[[::]]' and `[[::]]' match the null
string at the beginning and end of a word respectively. A
word is defined as a sequence of word characters
On Sat, 3 Jul 1999, Jamie Howard wrote:
: I also do not use mmap(), I treat the file as a simple stream
: instead. My code is also a bit slower on larger files, but a bit faster
: on smaller files. Sometimes I am an order of magnitude slower. I am
: never that much faster. I think not using
24 matches
Mail list logo
