Am 28.09.12 11:31, schrieb Steffen Daode Nurpmeso:
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
| but still not anywhere as readable as bsdlabel.
|
|
| I did specifically say 'machine readable'. The XML is well-formed,
|XML is stupid. everything you can do with XML can be
but still not anywhere as readable as bsdlabel.
I did specifically say 'machine readable'. The XML is well-formed,
XML is stupid. everything you can do with XML can be better described
using ancient style text format
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:19:12 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
but still not anywhere as readable as bsdlabel.
I did specifically say 'machine readable'. The XML is well-formed,
XML is stupid. everything you can do with XML can be better described
using
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
| but still not anywhere as readable as bsdlabel.
|
|
| I did specifically say 'machine readable'. The XML is well-formed,
|XML is stupid. everything you can do with XML can be better described
|using ancient style text format
Or, if
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Desmond da Peoples wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Tom Evans wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Jeff Anton an...@hesiod.org wrote:
^E my point is that all this information needs to be
together in one human and machine
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Eischen deisc...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Tom Evans wrote:
The current GEOM configuration is available from a sysctl in machine
readable format - check out kern.geom.confxml. If you are concerned
kern.geom.confxml is far from
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:54:41 -0400
From: deisc...@freebsd.org
To: tevans...@googlemail.com
CC: an...@hesiod.org; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: gpart is junk
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Tom Evans wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Jeff Anton an...@hesiod.org wrote:
… my point
On 16.09.2012 23:12, Jeff Anton wrote:
The whole geom system may be very important and may be the way to move
forward. But if it is so
important, it's important to bring forward all the important functionality
that we know from the
past, i.e. fdisk and bsdlabel or their real useful
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Jeff Anton an...@hesiod.org wrote:
… my point is that all this information needs to be
together in one human and machine readable form. We need to be able to look
at the whole picture of a device and say that makes sense then do it. And
this shouldn't be from
IMHO, gpart and GEOM are fantastic.
anyway it is MUCH easier and faster to edit disklabels with bsdlabel -e
than with gpart.
Unfortunately since some time bsdlabel cannot edit labels if ANY of
partitions are open.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
On 17 Sep 2012 12:58, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
wrote:
IMHO, gpart and GEOM are fantastic.
anyway it is MUCH easier and faster to edit disklabels with bsdlabel -e
than with gpart.
Unfortunately since some time bsdlabel cannot edit labels if ANY of
partitions are open.
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Tom Evans wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Jeff Anton an...@hesiod.org wrote:
… my point is that all this information needs to be
together in one human and machine readable form. We need to be able to look
at the whole picture of a device and say that makes sense
12 matches
Mail list logo