Re: hosted, or not (Re: Renaming all symbols in libmp(3))

2009-02-28 Thread perryh
Roman Divacky freebsd.org!rdiva...@agora.rdrop.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:46:22PM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: By default, LLVM has a built-in prototype of pow(), similar to GCC. Unlike GCC, LLVM raises a compiler error by default ... ... it's invalid code to have

Re: hosted, or not (Re: Renaming all symbols in libmp(3))

2009-02-28 Thread Ed Schouten
* per...@pluto.rain.com per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: So perhaps one solution would be to compile libmp with -ffreestanding? And all applications that use mp.h. -- Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl WWW: http://80386.nl/ pgpwD14uSm0Hj.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: hosted, or not (Re: Renaming all symbols in libmp(3))

2009-02-28 Thread Roman Divacky
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:24:56AM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: * per...@pluto.rain.com per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: So perhaps one solution would be to compile libmp with -ffreestanding? And all applications that use mp.h. which is a nonsense... please move forward

hosted, or not (Re: Renaming all symbols in libmp(3))

2009-02-27 Thread perryh
By default, LLVM has a built-in prototype of pow(), similar to GCC. Unlike GCC, LLVM raises a compiler error by default ... ... it's invalid code to have a function named pow() in a hosted environment which is not /The/ pow(). ^^^ I don't suppose LLVM supports a

Re: hosted, or not (Re: Renaming all symbols in libmp(3))

2009-02-27 Thread Roman Divacky
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:46:22PM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: By default, LLVM has a built-in prototype of pow(), similar to GCC. Unlike GCC, LLVM raises a compiler error by default ... ... it's invalid code to have a function named pow() in a hosted environment which is not