Marius Strobl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 01:44:25PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
[Replies re-directed to freebsd-sun4v]
On 2008-Aug-21 14:42:55 -0700, Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that there is a general expectation by freebsd users and
developers
[cc list trimmed]
On 2008-Sep-08 01:14:39 -0700, Darren Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The critical issue for freebsd (and any operating system for
that matter) on rock is how well does the kernel scale to a
system with that many concurrent threads?
Right now it doesn't. And based on some
[Replies re-directed to freebsd-sun4v]
On 2008-Aug-21 14:42:55 -0700, Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that there is a general expectation by freebsd users and
developers that unsupported code should not be in CVS. Although sun4v
is a very interesting platform for developers doing SMP
Peter Jeremy wrote:
[Replies re-directed to freebsd-sun4v]
On 2008-Aug-21 14:42:55 -0700, Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that there is a general expectation by freebsd users and
developers that unsupported code should not be in CVS. Although sun4v
is a very interesting platform
On Aug 22, 2008, at 4:33 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
[Replies re-directed to freebsd-sun4v]
On 2008-Aug-21 14:42:55 -0700, Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that there is a general expectation by freebsd users and
developers that unsupported code should not be in CVS. Although sun4v
is
Well, let's see what architecture the upcoming Rock CPUs are;
judging their feature list they appear to be a continuation of
the Fujitsu sun4u line rather than a successor of UST1/2 :)
That is not what I've heard.
-Kip
___
I apologise for cross-posting.
I believe that there is a general expectation by freebsd users and
developers that unsupported code should not be in CVS. Although sun4v
is a very interesting platform for developers doing SMP work, I simply
do not have the time or energy to maintain it. If someone
7 matches
Mail list logo
