On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:38:14 -0700
Steve Franks bahamasfra...@gmail.com wrote:
It's much safer to just leave the libraries alone. __Just because you
upgraded libpng doesn't mean that your old gtk binary will stop working
(assuming you are using portupgrade or portmaster -w which preserves
It's much safer to just leave the libraries alone. Just because you
upgraded libpng doesn't mean that your old gtk binary will stop working
(assuming you are using portupgrade or portmaster -w which preserves old
About to get flamed, I know Untrue. Portupgrade deletes the old
version of the
In the last episode (Apr 22), Steve Franks said:
It's much safer to just leave the libraries alone. Just because you
upgraded libpng doesn't mean that your old gtk binary will stop working
(assuming you are using portupgrade or portmaster -w which preserves
About to get flamed, I know
In the last episode (Apr 22), Dan Nelson said:
In the last episode (Apr 22), Steve Franks said:
(such as myself) incorrectly pointing a port at libpng.5 instead of any
libpng, or libpng = 5. Once the ports tree is 'poisoned' in this
fashion, there's really no going back. I'd sure vote for
hello all fbsd devs
i want to know if there is a possibility to avoid current strict
libraries linking .. i will explain myself
for example .. i have installed 'gtk' (2.18) that depends on library
'libpng.so.5' (png) .. and i will upgrade 'png' port to a superior
version that install the library
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Leinier Cruz Salfran
salfrancl.lis...@gmail.com wrote:
hello all fbsd devs
i want to know if there is a possibility to avoid current strict
libraries linking .. i will explain myself
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Gary Jennejohn
gljennj...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:23:16 -0400
Leinier Cruz Salfran salfrancl.lis...@gmail.com wrote:
hello all fbsd devs
i want to know if there is a possibility to avoid current strict
libraries linking .. i will
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:23:16 -0400
Leinier Cruz Salfran salfrancl.lis...@gmail.com wrote:
hello all fbsd devs
i want to know if there is a possibility to avoid current strict
libraries linking .. i will explain myself
for example .. i have installed 'gtk' (2.18) that depends on library
In the last episode (Apr 14), Leinier Cruz Salfran said:
i want to know if there is a possibility to avoid current strict libraries
linking .. i will explain myself
for example .. i have installed 'gtk' (2.18) that depends on library
'libpng.so.5' (png) .. and i will upgrade 'png' port to
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote:
In the last episode (Apr 14), Leinier Cruz Salfran said:
i want to know if there is a possibility to avoid current strict libraries
linking .. i will explain myself
for example .. i have installed 'gtk' (2.18) that
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:44:32 -0400
Leinier Cruz Salfran salfrancl.lis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Leinier Cruz Salfran
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Leinier Cruz Salfran
salfrancl.lis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com
wrote: Just because you
Anyway, the FreeBSD port maintainers usually bump the
revision of dependant ports when a major library like
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Leinier Cruz Salfran
salfrancl.lis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com
wrote: Just because you
Anyway, the FreeBSD port maintainers
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leinier Cruz Salfran
salfrancl.lis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
The port maintainer doesn't *have to* update anything. When library
ports
go through a library bump like this, all the ports that
14 matches
Mail list logo
