Re: Loader reading FAT

2009-06-17 Thread Adrian Chadd
2009/6/17 Rick C. Petty rick-freebsd2...@kiwi-computer.com: I read somewhere that there isn't enough space in the boot2 loader to put such logic.  You're only guaranteed 15 512-byte sectors or 7680 bytes, if you use any UFS partition.  It's pretty tight; I think you will find it difficult to

Re: How best to debug locking/scheduler problems

2009-06-17 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 7:01:45 pm Mel Flynn wrote: On Tuesday 16 June 2009 11:02:42 John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 16 June 2009 1:52:23 pm Mel Flynn wrote: Hi John, On Tuesday 16 June 2009 04:19:57 John Baldwin wrote: On Monday 15 June 2009 5:53:05 pm Mel Flynn wrote: PID

Re: tmpfs experimental?

2009-06-17 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Wojciech Puchar wrote: WP In other words, is there still reason for the highly experimental WP feature warning? WP WP Last time when I added the warning, it was because some data corruption WP issue that can be identified by fsx which I didn't got a chance to WP

small usr.bin/find patch

2009-06-17 Thread Alexander Best
hi everybody, here's just a quick hack i applied to find. i very often use the -size switch and always forget if you need to append m or M for megabyte or k or K for kilobyte. after applying the patch find accepts both. ;-) cheers. findpatch Description: Binary data

Re: How best to debug locking/scheduler problems

2009-06-17 Thread Mel Flynn
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 04:15:26 John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 16 June 2009 7:01:45 pm Mel Flynn wrote: On Tuesday 16 June 2009 11:02:42 John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 16 June 2009 1:52:23 pm Mel Flynn wrote: Hi John, On Tuesday 16 June 2009 04:19:57 John Baldwin wrote:

Re: small usr.bin/find patch

2009-06-17 Thread Julian Elischer
Alexander Best wrote: hi everybody, here's just a quick hack i applied to find. i very often use the -size switch and always forget if you need to append m or M for megabyte or k or K for kilobyte. after applying the patch find accepts both. ;-) cheers. Are you sure this is wise? after all

Re: How best to debug locking/scheduler problems

2009-06-17 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 3:52:54 pm Mel Flynn wrote: On Wednesday 17 June 2009 04:15:26 John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 16 June 2009 7:01:45 pm Mel Flynn wrote: On Tuesday 16 June 2009 11:02:42 John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 16 June 2009 1:52:23 pm Mel Flynn wrote: Hi John,

Re: small usr.bin/find patch

2009-06-17 Thread Wojciech Puchar
cheers. Are you sure this is wise? after all 125 millibytes would be 1 bit.. Agree. While lots of people use m instead of M and b instead of B, this is not right to correct proper behavior to improper just for them. ___

Re: How best to debug locking/scheduler problems

2009-06-17 Thread Mel Flynn
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 13:17:37 John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 17 June 2009 3:52:54 pm Mel Flynn wrote: On Wednesday 17 June 2009 04:15:26 John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 16 June 2009 7:01:45 pm Mel Flynn wrote: On Tuesday 16 June 2009 11:02:42 John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 16

CFT: final patches for NGROUPS16

2009-06-17 Thread Brooks Davis
Please find attached three patches which result in raising NGROUPS to 1024, making programs in the base system immune to changing values of NGROUPS, and pave the way for NGROUPS to be boot time configurable. The first two patches (ngroups-catman.diff and ngroups-posix.diff) are userland cleanups.

Re: valgrind on FreeBSD 7

2009-06-17 Thread Yuri
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: I have been working on/off on it. I am trying to find my work in progress sources, but I think they got lost when a hard disk died. This is all I have found: http://www.in-nomine.org/~asmodai/valgrind/valgrind-trunk-for-freebsd.diff Any news on