Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dirk Engling [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
The default configuration doesn't expose sendmail to the publicly
visible IP addres. The daemon it runs only listens for connections to
the localhost address.
Which is rewritten to the
Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dirk Engling [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
The default configuration doesn't expose sendmail to the publicly
visible IP addres
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Pascal Hofstee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any additional sugestions/objections are always greatly appreciated.
On 32-bit platforms (i386, powerpc), int is a 32-bit signed integer while
size_t is a
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: If we do decide to go ahead with the ABI change, there are a number of
other
: things that should be done simultaneously
Daichi GOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabian Keil wrote:
Looks like the attachment was filtered.
I got a different panic on
FreeBSD TP51.local 6.1-RC FreeBSD 6.1-RC #22: Wed Apr 26 13:25:57 CEST 2006
after mounting an empty directory above /usr/src,
applying a patch and using find's
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daichi GOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabian Keil wrote:
I got a different panic on
FreeBSD TP51.local 6.1-RC FreeBSD 6.1-RC #22: Wed Apr 26 13:25:57 CEST
2006
after mounting an empty directory above /usr/src,
applying a patch and using
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daichi GOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabian Keil wrote:
What I'm doing is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $mkdir /tmp/unionfs-src/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $mount_unionfs /tmp/unionfs-src /usr/src
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Eric Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it expected that truncate(8) must be used by a superuser? If so,
then the man page should probably mention it. If not, then it's
broken :)
What exactly is truncate(8)?
On FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE I only have truncate(1)
and it doesn't show any problems.
Roman Bogorodskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a problem obtaining kernel dump. The box has 512Mb of RAM.
In rc.conf I have:
dumpdev=/dev/ad4s1b
dumpdir=/var/crash
swapinfo -h gives the following:
Device 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity
/dev/ad4s1b 1048576
I recently submitted a patch to the vlc developers that prevents
a crash on FreeBSD 8.0 by not calling posix_memalign() with a
size argument of zero.
A simplified test case would be:
#include stdlib.h
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
void *ptr;
posix_memalign(ptr, 16, 0);
Jason Evans jas...@freebsd.org wrote:
Fabian Keil wrote:
Rémi Denis-Courmont, one of the vlc developers, pointed out
that passing a zero size to posix_memalign() should actually
work, though:
| In principle, while useless, there is no reason why allocating an empty
| picture should
Rick C. Petty rick-freebsd2...@kiwi-computer.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:25:43PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 01/18/10 11:29, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 01/17/10 17:07, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi hackers
I'm tired of my X server occasionaly
b84b5cf4f24b6886b5db9885f5bea707dcfb11e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Keil f...@fabiankeil.de
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:55:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Work around umastat build failures on amd64.
---
tools/tools/umastat/umastat.c | 16
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools
Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
I am trying to run this dtrace script:
#!/usr/sbin/dtrace -s
pid123:libc::entry
{
self-timestmp[probefunc] = timestmp;
}
pid123:libc::return
/self-timestmp[probefunc] != 0/
{
@function_duration[probefunc] = sum(timestmp -
self-timestmp[probefunc]);
Brandon Falk falk...@gamozo.org wrote:
I was got some read errors when I was reading from my disk, which is
fine. But then cdparanoia starting to no longer respond. Now it's
zombied and sitting in cbwait. `kill -9 pid` does not take it down, it
seems like it's stuck in the kernel (?). Is this
Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com wrote:
I've implemented the sched provider for FreeBSD. This provider
provides probes that fire when various scheduling decisions are made.
Thanks a lot. Works for me (so far) with HEAD on amd64.
Fabian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Fabian Keil f...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com wrote:
I've implemented the sched provider for FreeBSD. This provider
provides probes that fire when various scheduling decisions are made.
Thanks a lot. Works for me (so far) with HEAD on amd64.
The following seems
Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
In this vein it might make sense to enable KTR and KTR_SCHED in GENERIC.
KTR_SCHED comes with a performance hit. Besides, with the DTrace
sched provider that I committed this month
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
is it possible to convert geli encrypted device using keyfile to password
only?
possibly i miss something in manual. thanks.
The geli(8) action you are looking for is called setkey.
Fabian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
It seems that the $subj is missing :-)
In my environment that causes many functions to not have fbt return probe,
because function body decoding fails before 'ret' is found.
Here is my attempt at fixing the problem:
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 10/06/2012 16:27 Fabian Keil said the following:
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
It seems that the $subj is missing :-)
In my environment that causes many functions to not have fbt return probe,
because function body decoding fails before
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 10/06/2012 20:56 Fabian Keil said the following:
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 10/06/2012 16:27 Fabian Keil said the following:
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
It seems that the $subj is missing :-)
In my environment
Chema García ch...@safetybits.net wrote:
I've been trying to compile Python 2.7 with dtrace support from
https://hg.jcea.es/cpython-2011/ (branch dtrace-issue13405_2.7 ) to test
http://bugs.python.org/issue13405#msg164610.
I've also recompiled the kernel to enable dtrace support by
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 09/07/2012 22:49 Sean Bruno said the following:
Ran into some symbol errors with the dtraceall module when using the
*old* nfs client.
I think that this is more or less the right thing to do, but I'm not
sure.
---
Sean Bruno sean...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 06:41 -0700, Fabian Keil wrote:
--- //depot/yahoo/ybsd_9/src/sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall/dtraceall.c
2011-11-02 23:46:55.0
+++ /home/seanbru/dtrace_9/src/sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall/dtraceall.c
2011
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 10/07/2012 21:57 Fabian Keil said the following:
I do not use a completely NFS-free kernel, but I don't build any
NFS-related modules. Trying to load an unpatched dtraceall results in:
Jul 9 21:58:48 r500 sudo: fk : TTY=pts/16 ; PWD=/home
Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Fabian Keil wrote:
I'm using the following modification of Sean's patch:
This way it seems to work as expected:
diff --git a/sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall/Makefile
b/sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall/Makefile
index 456efd1..628583b 100644
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 12/07/2012 21:17 Fabian Keil said the following:
Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Fabian Keil wrote:
I'm using the following modification of Sean's patch:
This way it seems to work as expected:
diff --git a/sys
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 12/07/2012 22:36 Fabian Keil said the following:
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 12/07/2012 21:17 Fabian Keil said the following:
Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Fabian Keil wrote:
I'm using the following
Sean Bruno sean...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 12:47 -0700, Andrew Boyer wrote:
On Jul 12, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/07/2012 22:36 Fabian Keil said the following:
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 12/07/2012 21:17 Fabian Keil said
dweimer dwei...@dweimer.net wrote:
On 2012-10-22 12:44, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
Update:
It looks pretty bad so far. Page:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2012Tasks
Has 38 tasks so far out of which:
~30 would qualify.
Consider this e-mail to be the last call
Karl Pielorz kpielorz_...@tdx.co.uk wrote:
Can anyone think of any quick pointers as to why some code originally
written under 6.4 amd64 - when re-compiled under 9.0-stable amd64 takes
up a *lot* more memory when running?
6.4 comes with phkmalloc while 9.0 uses jemalloc. Maybe you are
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
see developing in project/camlock SVN branch. Full diff of that branch
against present head (r255131) can be
33 matches
Mail list logo
