I honestly can't see why you would want to waste your time like this,
but it's yours to waste I suppose. (Even a notorious packrat like me
has gotten rid of hardware from that era.)
mcl
Hmm, So that's you jhb warning me off. Well I do have a ToDo list
that's a mile long, so maybe I'd best
Julian Elischer wrote:
I think a 386 can assume non-SMP in which case that can be simulated
just fine :-)
it also simplifies a lot of the other breakages..
#if (CPU == 80386) defined(SMP)
#error can't have smp on a 386
#endif
Paging Terry Lambert...Terry Lambert, to the hackers lounge
On 22 Sep 2009, at 19:03, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
My comment is to just use 4.x (seriously). A true 386 is going to
be quite
slow and the overhead of many things added that work well on newer
processors
is going to be very painful on a 386 (probably
Rui Paulo wrote:
On 22 Sep 2009, at 19:03, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
My comment is to just use 4.x (seriously). A true 386 is going to
be quite
slow and the overhead of many things added that work well on newer
processors
is going to be
On 23 Sep 2009, at 16:54, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
4.11 fell out of security support some while back, but
http://www.freebsd.org/security/index.html
only lists what's still in, not what fell out when.
Right, but IIRC there were some folks patch 4-STABLE after the
security officer
On Wednesday 23 September 2009 11:54:34 am Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Rui Paulo wrote:
On 22 Sep 2009, at 19:03, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
My comment is to just use 4.x (seriously). A true 386 is going to
be quite
slow and the overhead of
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 23 September 2009 11:54:34 am Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Rui Paulo wrote:
On 22 Sep 2009, at 19:03, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
My comment is to just use 4.x (seriously). A true 386 is going to
be quite
slow and the overhead
On Wednesday 23 September 2009 1:21:59 pm Julian Elischer wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 23 September 2009 11:54:34 am Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Rui Paulo wrote:
On 22 Sep 2009, at 19:03, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
My comment is to just use
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 23 September 2009 1:21:59 pm Julian Elischer wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
Other things added since then assume at least a 486. Not having cmpxchg is a
bit of a killer.
I think a 386 can assume non-SMP in which case that can be simulated
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 05:54:34PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
4.11 fell out of security support some while back, but
http://www.freebsd.org/security/index.html
only lists what's still in, not what fell out when.
Then see http://people.freebsd.org/~linimon/schedule/milestones.html.
On Monday 21 September 2009 8:03:43 am Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi,
Reference:
From: Alexey Shuvaev shuv...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:56:59 +0200
Message-id: 20090918125659.ga88...@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de
Alexey Shuvaev
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
My comment is to just use 4.x (seriously). A true 386 is going to be quite
slow and the overhead of many things added that work well on newer processors
is going to be very painful on a 386 (probably on a 486 as well). 4.x runs
fine on a 386 and should
Hi,
Reference:
From: Alexey Shuvaev shuv...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:56:59 +0200
Message-id: 20090918125659.ga88...@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de
Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:09:46AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi
Hi hackers,
I'm trying to get my Genuine 386 running 7.2. It currently runs 4.11.
386 was first base of FreeBSD, a shame to lose it.
So far I've hacked diffs as below + the normal
/etc/make.conf CFLAGS += -march=i386
cross compiled all bins libs etc
setenv DESTDIR
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:09:46AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi hackers,
I'm trying to get my Genuine 386 running 7.2. It currently runs 4.11.
386 was first base of FreeBSD, a shame to lose it.
So far I've hacked diffs as below + the normal
/etc/make.conf CFLAGS += -march=i386
15 matches
Mail list logo
