I guess I'm late to the party (catching up on the whole thread took a
while...)
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Eitan Adler wrote:
patch(1) explicitly tries to use RCS (and SCCS) in certain cases. Are
we okay with a base system utility that behaves differently depending
on whether a port is installed?
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote:
I guess I'm late to the party (catching up on the whole thread took a
while...)
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Eitan Adler wrote:
patch(1) explicitly tries to use RCS (and SCCS) in certain cases. Are
we okay with a base system
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 04:17:03PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
patch(1) explicitly tries to use RCS (and SCCS) in certain cases.
At the SCCS behavior is part of (the SCCS option in ) POSIX 2008.
So far I haven't seen any reason for messing with it.
Joerg
In message caf6rxgni6kw6qtlmwwqdc2suqp+wa5-ptqwgsbtpa1-x_vz...@mail.gmail.com
, Eitan Adler writes:
patch(1) explicitly tries to use RCS (and SCCS) in certain cases. Are
we okay with a base system utility that behaves differently depending
on whether a port is installed? Should the relevant code
4 matches
Mail list logo