Gary Palmer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 03:40:52PM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote:
opt_sctp.h
Is one created by the config program when you run
config with
options SCTP
in your list of things you want..
So for example I do
cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf
config mymachine
cd
Lawrence:
Cools stuff...
I have my intern working on getting pluggable CC into
SCTP and HTCP with Fred's extra's as well...
Hmm.. maybe I can align your code to work with SCTP as well..
Neat..
Thanks for the good work :-D
R
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Hi all,
Finally managed to wrap up the
That partially worked. I could only ping 192.168.1.1 on my local setup (router).
I used
$ mpd pptp0
However, I couldn't access the work DNS either. The latter output of
MPD looked like:
==
pptp0] IPCP: rec'd Configure Ack #4 link 0 (Ack-Sent)
IPADDR IP-ADDR-A
[pptp0] IPCP: state change
Jim Stapleton wrote:
That partially worked. I could only ping 192.168.1.1 on my local setup
(router).
I used
$ mpd pptp0
However, I couldn't access the work DNS either. The latter output of
MPD looked like:
==
pptp0] IPCP: rec'd Configure Ack #4 link 0 (Ack-Sent)
IPADDR IP-ADDR-A
What man/handbook pages/sections should I look at to get a clue. I'm
so far from having one, I don't even know the direction...
Thanks,
-Jim Stapleton
On 6/26/07, Artyom Viklenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Stapleton wrote:
That partially worked. I could only ping 192.168.1.1 on my local
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Jim Stapleton wrote:
What man/handbook pages/sections should I look at to get a clue. I'm
so far from having one, I don't even know the direction...
see handbook section about networking.
simply speaking enter
route add ip-of-vpn-server ip-of-your-lan-gateway
then
Doug Ambrisko wrote:
Bruce M. Simpson writes:
[snip]
| My concern is that vimage may be a very intrusive change indeed where
| these matters are concerned, unless the vimage patches are being kept
| up-to-date and regression tested as issues are resolved and new features
| added.
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Artyom Viklenko wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Jim Stapleton wrote:
What man/handbook pages/sections should I look at to get a clue. I'm
so far from having one, I don't even know the direction...
see handbook section about networking.
simply speaking enter
Hi.
I'm glad to present version 4.2 of MPD. It includes many new features,
performance improvements and fixes.
The most significant and unique new feature of mpd-4.2 is a link
repeater functionality. It allows mpd to accept incoming connection of
any supported type and forward it out as same or
Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I'm glad to present version 4.2 of MPD. It includes many new features,
performance improvements and fixes.
[...]
Complete change log as always can be found at:
http://mpd.sourceforge.net/doc/mpd5.html
There has been some talk about whether mpd should be put in
Hello, freebsd-net.
We have large NAT server with 256 NAT instances there. Earlier, we
used a lot of natd daemons, but recently (some months ago) i've
moved it to ng_nat.
And it seems to me, that there is a memory leak there, cause
allocated memory grows constantly every day - after
If memory serves me right, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 7:55 PMJun 25, 2007, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Eric F Crist wrote:
My problem isn't getting out to 2001:4980:1::5, it's getting to my
LAN, the 2001:4980:1:111::/64 network. My gateway, the machine
from which I posted the
On Jun 26, 2007, at 4:32 PMJun 26, 2007, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
If memory serves me right, Eric F Crist wrote:
Hi Eric--
First note that I'm a different Bruce than the chap who's been helping
thus far. :-)
BTW, use ndp -a to see this.
Your setup is not *too* different from what I have at
On Tuesday, 26 June 2007 at 18:50:23 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I'm glad to present version 4.2 of MPD. It includes many new features,
performance improvements and fixes.
The most significant and unique new feature of mpd-4.2 is a link
repeater functionality. It allows mpd to
Julian Elischer wrote:
There has been some talk about whether mpd should be put in the base
system to replace our 3 other ppp implementations. I guess one step
would be to see what the usage cases would be for replacing if_ppp and
sppp and a first step
would be to see how many users of these
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
This is probably a new feature request, but is this possible to create
some kind of VirtualTemplate interface like it is in Cisco access
routers. Currently i have to configure bunch of different ng interfaces
for every kind user. However on my Cisco 7206VXR i can bundle
Alexander Motin wrote:
As I see situation now:
ppp - good user-level implementation. Not very fast, but stable,
flexible and able to be used with other programs like pppoed.
possibly there could be a program that can run and then
pass the connection to mpd. ppp Uses this technique to run
If memory serves me right, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Jun 26, 2007, at 4:32 PMJun 26, 2007, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
[big snip]
I wonder if the problem I've seen with bridge(4) might be related to
your IPv6 problems (since you're terminating the tunnel on your
firewall). If so, maybe switching to
On Jun 26, 2007, at 7:08 PMJun 26, 2007, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
If memory serves me right, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Jun 26, 2007, at 4:32 PMJun 26, 2007, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
[big snip]
I wonder if the problem I've seen with bridge(4) might be related to
your IPv6 problems (since you're
On Wednesday, 27 June 2007 at 2:25:22 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
This is probably a new feature request, but is this possible to create
some kind of VirtualTemplate interface like it is in Cisco access
routers. Currently i have to configure bunch of different ng
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 June 2007 at 2:25:22 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
This is probably a new feature request, but is this possible to create
some kind of VirtualTemplate interface like it is in Cisco access
routers. Currently i have to configure bunch
hi;
I wonder if new mpd still needs hundreds of config lines for 300 incoming pptp
connections.?
and does it still create a new ng interface even no pptp connections
established?
does new mpd support unlimited incoming connections?
what about performance issuess ? (ex: cpu usage, memory
22 matches
Mail list logo
