If you are adding globals to the networking code, (or if you have
added soem globals in the last few months, could you make sure that
I am aware of them?
marko Zec and I are trying to keep teh Vimage tree in perforce
in sync with -current but there is noo automatic way that we would
be
Hi!
I need /etc/namedb to be owned by root:bind and have permissions 01775,
so bind may write to it but may not overwrite files that belong to root
here, and I made it so. Suprise!
# /etc/rc.d/named restart
Stopping named.
Hello
My problem appears when using the |net-p2p/qbittorrent| for downloading
media-data from the torrent trackers.
here are some outputs
--
# uname -a
FreeBSD spectrum 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Fri Jul 18 22:39:18
Hello
My problem appears when using the |net-p2p/qbittorrent| for downloading
media-data from the torrent trackers.
here are some outputs
--
# uname -a
FreeBSD spectrum 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Fri Jul 18 22:39:18
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
If you are adding globals to the networking code, (or if you have added soem
globals in the last few months, could you make sure that I am aware of them?
marko Zec and I are trying to keep teh Vimage tree in perforce in sync with
-current but there
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
I need /etc/namedb to be owned by root:bind and have permissions 01775,
so bind may write to it but may not overwrite files that belong to root
here, and I made it so. Suprise!
# /etc/rc.d/named restart
Ian Smith wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Mike Makonnen wrote:
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Mike Makonnen escreveu:
Hi,
An Internet Cafe I do some work for was recently having problems with
very slow internet access. It turns out customers were running P2P
file sharing applications
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 10:32:22PM +1000, Ian Smith wrote:
I need /etc/namedb to be owned by root:bind and have permissions 01775,
so bind may write to it but may not overwrite files that belong to root
here, and I made it so. Suprise!
# /etc/rc.d/named restart
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 10:32:22PM +1000, Ian Smith wrote:
I need /etc/namedb to be owned by root:bind and have permissions 01775,
so bind may write to it but may not overwrite files that belong to root
here, and I made it so. Suprise!
Synopsis: txpower problem with Atheros wifi card
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386-freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: remko
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Aug 3 16:03:26 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=126214
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
An FYI on the state of things here: in the last month, John has updated a
number of device drivers to be MPSAFE, and the USB work remains in-flight.
I'm holding fire a bit on disabling IFF_NEEDSGIANT while
So hacking /etc/rc.d/named in chroot_autoupdate to do something like:
files_bind_writes='named.run' # whatever
for f in ${files_bind_writes}; do
touch ${named_chrootdir}/etc/namedb/${f}
chown bind:wheel ${named_chrootdir}/etc/namedb/${f}
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Hi!
I need /etc/namedb to be owned by root:bind and have permissions 01775,
so bind may write to it but may not overwrite files that belong to root
here, and I made it so.
I understand your frustration with something having changed that you
did not expect. I would
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Mike Makonnen wrote:
Ian Smith wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Mike Makonnen wrote:
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Mike Makonnen escreveu:
[..]
/*
* Inform divert(4) what rule to send it to by
* modifying the port
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
I need /etc/namedb to be owned by root:bind and have permissions 01775,
so bind may write to it but may not overwrite files that belong to root
here, and I made it so.
I understand your frustration with something having changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eugene Grosbein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need /etc/namedb to be owned by root:bind and have permissions
01775, so bind may write to it but may not overwrite files that belong
to root here, and I made it so.
Can't you just modify
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 02:21:41PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
I need /etc/namedb to be owned by root:bind and have permissions
01775, so bind may write to it but may not overwrite files that belong
to root here, and I made it so.
Can't you just modify /etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist so
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
I need /etc/namedb to be owned by root:bind and have permissions 01775,
so bind may write to it but may not overwrite files that belong to root
here, and I made it so.
I understand your frustration with
18 matches
Mail list logo