I csup my server from Jul 14 to today sources and saw strange issue
with arp table.
Long description see below.
Do you have the same issue on your own servers?
Partial reverting
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/if_ether.c
Revision 1.162.2.2 seems fix problem.
+#if 0 /*
I csup my server from Jul 14 to today sources and saw strange issue
with arp table.
Long description see below.
Do you have the same issue on your own servers?
Partial reverting [1]http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi
/src/sys/netinet/if_ether.c Revision 1.162.2.2 seems fix
I have a problem at the scheme:
( gw ) - ( nat_router ) - ( https )
real.ip0real.ip1 10.19.90.110.19.90.2
If I use ipfw+natd on nat_router then redirect to https server and to
nat_router local address 10.19.90.1 is well, but if ipfw+nat - redirect to
I have a problem at the scheme:
( gw ) - ( nat_router ) - ( https )
real.ip0real.ip1 10.19.90.110.19.90.2
If I use ipfw+natd on nat_router then redirect to https server and to
nat_router local address 10.19.90.1 is well, but if ipfw+nat - redirect to
Victor Hugo Bilouro wrote:
Hi People,
I posted the tcptest weekly status report at freebsd wiki.
http://wiki.freebsd.org/VictorBilouro/Release_0.1_Iteration_3
Other Links:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/VictorBilouro/TCP-IP_regression_test_suite
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Doug Barton wrote:
Adrian Penisoara wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Ian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the notable exception of making standard functions rndc trace and
querylog work, writing to the default file
Patrick Tracanelli escreveu:
Mike Makonnen escreveu:
Mike Makonnen wrote:
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
To let you know of my current (real world) tests:
- Wireless Internet Provider 1:
- 4Mbit/s of Internet Traffic
- Classifying default protocols + soulseek + ssh
- Classifying
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Mark Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Victor Hugo Bilouro wrote:
Hi People,
I posted the tcptest weekly status report at freebsd wiki.
http://wiki.freebsd.org/VictorBilouro/Release_0.1_Iteration_3
Other Links:
Is there a reason NG_PPP_MAX_BANDWIDTH is limited to a total of 10 Mbit?
If any of the links are faster than 10 Mbit, will i achieve same end
result by dividing Bandwidth by say 10? That is, for every 10 Mbit
physical link i configure ng_ppp to 1 Mbit?
Or could i change the constant to the
