On Jan 10, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Melissa Jenkins wrote:
I've been working on migrating a PPTP server from FreeBSD 7.1 to FreeBSD 8.1.
The server is configured using PopTop (from ports) and PPP (/usr/sbin)
rather than MPD. (Before anybody tells me to use MPD we can't because it
doesn't
Hello, Freebsd-net.
Very large and famous (due to very attractive prices) hosting
provider Hetzner.de discards FreeBSD support on dedicated servers,
because these servers can niot negotiate 100Mbit/DUPLEX when
switches' ports are limited to 100Mbit (1Gbit connection costs
additional money)
On 11 Jan 2011, at 09:13, Luiz Otavio O Souza wrote:
On Jan 10, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Melissa Jenkins wrote:
I've been working on migrating a PPTP server from FreeBSD 7.1 to FreeBSD
8.1. The server is configured using PopTop (from ports) and PPP (/usr/sbin)
rather than MPD. (Before anybody
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Very large and famous (due to very attractive prices) hosting
provider Hetzner.de discards FreeBSD support on dedicated servers,
because these servers can niot negotiate 100Mbit/DUPLEX when
switches' ports are limited to 100Mbit (1Gbit connection
Hello, Yamagi.
You wrote 11 января 2011 г., 13:30:23:
Hi,
I've got several Hetzner EQ4 and on all these machines FreeBSD 8.1 runs
just fine. I've never seen this strange negotiation problem myself. But
maybe I was just lucky and got working mainboard and nic combinations.
So if further
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
Very large and famous (due to very attractive prices) hosting
provider Hetzner.de discards FreeBSD support on dedicated servers,
because these servers can niot negotiate 100Mbit/DUPLEX when
switches' ports are limited to 100Mbit (1Gbit connection
On 12/24/2010 5:44 PM, Jan Koum wrote:
hi Ivan and Mike,
wanted to follow up and see if you found a solid long-term solution to this
bug. we are still seeing this problem in our 8.2 environment with ASPM
already disabled. here is what we have:
1. motherboard is SuperMicro X8SIE-LN4F
On 11/01/2011 15:04, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 12/24/2010 5:44 PM, Jan Koum wrote:
hi Ivan and Mike,
wanted to follow up and see if you found a solid long-term solution to this
bug. we are still seeing this problem in our 8.2 environment with ASPM
already disabled. here is what we have:
1.
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
I've got several Hetzner EQ4 and on all these machines FreeBSD 8.1 runs
just fine. I've never seen this strange negotiation problem myself. But
maybe I was just lucky and got working mainboard and nic combinations.
So if further information is needed,
The self-pointing route 10.0.5.1 should have multiple references set on
it, and that route won't be deleted from the routing table until the
last reference is removed.
You can verify that by checking the netstat output, the Ref column
after tun1 has been created.
The above has been verified
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:47:29PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-net.
Very large and famous (due to very attractive prices) hosting
provider Hetzner.de discards FreeBSD support on dedicated servers,
because these servers can niot negotiate 100Mbit/DUPLEX when
switches'
The self-pointing route 10.0.5.1 should have multiple references set on
it, and that route won't be deleted from the routing table until the
last reference is removed.
You can verify that by checking the netstat output, the Ref column
after tun1 has been created.
The above has been
Hello, Brian.
You wrote 11 января 2011 г., 19:38:25:
Very large and famous (due to very attractive prices) hosting
provider Hetzner.de discards FreeBSD support on dedicated servers,
because these servers can niot negotiate 100Mbit/DUPLEX when
switches' ports are limited to 100Mbit
Hello, Brian.
You wrote 11 января 2011 г., 22:29:13:
basic mode: 100 Mbit, full duplex
link partner: 100baseTx-HD
It looks VERY strange. How could id be?
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@serebryakov.spb.ru
___
11.01.2011 21:29, Lev Serebryakov пишет:
Hello, Brian.
You wrote 11 января 2011 г., 19:38:25:
Very large and famous (due to very attractive prices) hosting
provider Hetzner.de discards FreeBSD support on dedicated servers,
because these servers can niot negotiate 100Mbit/DUPLEX when
Hello, Marius.
You wrote 11 января 2011 г., 22:36:44:
I've discussed this problem in local (Russian-speaking) FreeBSD
community, and there are several people in DC 13 who HAVE these
problems and found different solutions, but all non-technical ones:
order gigabit connectivity, or pay for
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Artyom Viklenko wrote:
11.01.2011 21:29, Lev Serebryakov ?:
r...@rescue ~ # mii-tool -v eth0
eth0: 100 Mbit, full duplex, link ok
product info: vendor 00:07:32, model 17 rev 2
basic mode: 100 Mbit, full duplex
basic status: link ok
capabilities:
Hello, Artyom.
You wrote 11 января 2011 г., 22:39:33:
link partner: 100baseTx-HD
^
Looks very strange for me... 'HD' means half-duplex?
Yep, I've noticed that too...
May be linux driver defaults to full-duplex if autoneg fails?..
Or disabled... And it
11.01.2011 21:48, Bjoern A. Zeeb пишет:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Artyom Viklenko wrote:
11.01.2011 21:29, Lev Serebryakov ?:
r...@rescue ~ # mii-tool -v eth0
eth0: 100 Mbit, full duplex, link ok
product info: vendor 00:07:32, model 17 rev 2
basic mode: 100 Mbit, full duplex
basic status:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:39:33PM +0200, Artyom Viklenko wrote:
11.01.2011 21:29, Lev Serebryakov ?:
Looks very strange for me... 'HD' means half-duplex?
May be linux driver defaults to full-duplex if autoneg fails?..
I've seen some Linux drivers fail back to half-duplex under these
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:47:29PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-net.
Very large and famous (due to very attractive prices) hosting
provider Hetzner.de discards FreeBSD support on dedicated servers,
because these servers can niot negotiate 100Mbit/DUPLEX when
switches'
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Artyom Viklenko wrote:
11.01.2011 21:48, Bjoern A. Zeeb :
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Artyom Viklenko wrote:
11.01.2011 21:29, Lev Serebryakov ?:
r...@rescue ~ # mii-tool -v eth0
eth0: 100 Mbit, full duplex, link ok
product info: vendor 00:07:32, model 17 rev 2
basic
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 01:53:30PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Yamagi.
You wrote 11 ?? 2011 ?., 13:30:23:
Hi,
I've got several Hetzner EQ4 and on all these machines FreeBSD 8.1 runs
just fine. I've never seen this strange negotiation problem myself. But
maybe I was just
Hello, Artyom.
You wrote 11 января 2011 г., 22:57:17:
Is it possible to see status from corresponding port on Juniper switch?
Config part for this port on the switch would be also very interesting.
I (as customer with server which has problem) could ask techsupport
tomorrow. But, maybe, they
Hello, Pyun.
You wrote 11 января 2011 г., 23:00:07:
rgephy(4) currently always use auto-negotiation to work-around link
establishment issues reported in past.
I think, it is the root of the problem. Autonegotiation is DISABLED on
these ports. I think, some additional mediaopt (like
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:50:49PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Artyom.
You wrote 11 ?? 2011 ?., 22:39:33:
link partner: 100baseTx-HD
^
Looks very strange for me... 'HD' means half-duplex?
Yep, I've noticed that too...
May be linux
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:37:31PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Brian.
You wrote 11 ?? 2011 ?., 22:29:13:
basic mode: 100 Mbit, full duplex
link partner: 100baseTx-HD
It looks VERY strange. How could id be?
This is normal if the link partner doesn't do
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:31:10AM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Pyun.
You wrote 11 января 2011 г., 23:00:07:
rgephy(4) currently always use auto-negotiation to work-around link
establishment issues reported in past.
I think, it is the root of the problem. Autonegotiation is
I'm working with a customer who has a FreeBSD 8.0 firewall, set up with firewall
NAT in IPFW. It uses one-to-one static NAT to redirect FTP sessions
originating on the outside to an FTP server on the inside. The FTP server is
accessible via text-based FTP clients, but not via Web-based clients
Out of interest what change was that?
- Original Message -
From: Vogel, Jack jack.vo...@intel.com
To: TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro n...@freebsd.org; jfvo...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 9:17 PM
Subject: RE: Supermicro
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 03:13 -, you wrote:
Out of interest what change was that?
As what seems to have been a left-over from a debugging session a
long time ago, I had MSI disabled in loader.conf. That's not
supported by the driver. So simply reenabling that solved my
problem.
Robin
--
12.01.2011 01:06, Brett Glass пишет:
I'm working with a customer who has a FreeBSD 8.0 firewall, set up with firewall
NAT in IPFW. It uses one-to-one static NAT to redirect FTP sessions
originating on the outside to an FTP server on the inside. The FTP server is
accessible via text-based FTP
May be linux driver defaults to full-duplex if autoneg fails?..
I've seen some Linux drivers fail back to half-duplex under these
circumstances.
It may very well depend on driver version and hardware (firmware)?
I admit, I don't know what layer is responsible for handling
33 matches
Mail list logo
