On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:37:01PM +0200, Boris Astardzhiev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for the delay of my reply. As far as I understand pthread_testcancel()
> is not necessary in the recvmmsg syscall since cancellation is not quite
> common
> among apps. But if there is cancellation attempts as
Hello,
Sorry for the delay of my reply. As far as I understand pthread_testcancel()
is not necessary in the recvmmsg syscall since cancellation is not quite
common
among apps. But if there is cancellation attempts as long as I use
__sys_recvmsg() instead
of the interposing approach on a cancel
in the situation
IPSec --> epair0a --> epair0b
pf does not see inbound packets on the interface epair0b, because the
epair driver does not clear the flag PACKET_TAG_IPSEC_IN_DONE when he
transfers a packet from epair0a to epair0b. The following patch for
FreeBSD 10 works for me and is
> On 18 Jan 2016, at 16:13 , Andreas Longwitz wrote:
>
> in the situation
>IPSec --> epair0a --> epair0b
> pf does not see inbound packets on the interface epair0b, because the
> epair driver does not clear the flag PACKET_TAG_IPSEC_IN_DONE when he
> transfers a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201694
--- Comment #8 from Paul Armstrong ---
Note that 11-CURRENT is slightly better in that it requires pf unloaded before
jail start and then restart after loading it (as opposed to crashing on jail
restart if pf is loaded at
Hi, thanks for answer.
>> in the situation
>>IPSec --> epair0a --> epair0b --> em1
>> pf does not see inbound packets on the interface epair0b, because the
>> epair driver does not clear the flag PACKET_TAG_IPSEC_IN_DONE when he
>> transfers a packet from epair0a to epair0b. The following