On 20 September 2012 19:47, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
Yet another patch to test. Was suprising to me that lagg(4), which
aims at high-performance, still utilizes if_start.
Attached is patch that converts lagg(4) to use if_transmit. I'd
appreciate if someone who do
On 20 September 2012 20:48, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 08:37:19PM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
AYet another patch to test. Was suprising to me that lagg(4), which
A aims at high-performance, still utilizes if_start.
A
AAttached is patch
On 6 July 2012 04:43, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy coolsy...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/7/4 Andrew Thompson thom...@freebsd.org
On 4 July 2012 23:30, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy coolsy...@gmail.com wrote:
i have sever with two 1G links (em) aggregated by lagg0
after 1700Megabits i have collisions/errors
On 4 July 2012 23:30, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy coolsy...@gmail.com wrote:
i have sever with two 1G links (em) aggregated by lagg0
after 1700Megabits i have collisions/errors on lagg0 port, but not on em0
or em1
I'm using nginx in own CDN. and server don't limited my mbufs, irq, or
anything
On 10 June 2012 02:27, Gustau Perez Querol gpe...@entel.upc.edu wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing panics when removing an interface of a bridge. The system runs
HEAD/AMD64 r236733. I see no changes to if_bridge.c in the last two days, so
I would say the problem's still there. I also checked stable and
On 7 June 2012 19:08, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
I experience a problem where vpnc can not exit cleanly and gets stuck.
pstree shows this chain:
|-+= 31375 root vpnc
| \-+- 13412 root /bin/sh /usr/local/sbin/vpnc-script-custom
| \--- 13446 root ifconfig tun0 destroy
$
On 18 April 2012 12:39, Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org wrote:
When a new lagg(4) interface is created the link layer address from the
first port in the group is assigned to the lagg and to all other lagg
port members. This means the address assigned to the lagg is different
if specified as, for
On 14 April 2012 06:03, Hajimu UMEMOTO u...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:01:39 +1200
Andrew Thompson thom...@freebsd.org said:
thompsa On 13 April 2012 18:41, Rainer Bredehorn bredeh...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi!
I have noticed that getifaddrs() does not have sin6_scope_id set
On 13 April 2012 18:41, Rainer Bredehorn bredeh...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi!
I have noticed that getifaddrs() does not have sin6_scope_id set to
the interface id for link local addresses on AF_INET6 types. Running
the following program gives different results on Linux
ifconfig shows the scopeid
Hi,
I have noticed that getifaddrs() does not have sin6_scope_id set to
the interface id for link local addresses on AF_INET6 types. Running
the following program gives different results on Linux
FreeBSD:
dev: bge0 address: fe80:2::a6ba:dbff:fe03:d69 scope 0
dev: xl0 address:
On 3 April 2012 00:35, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, March 30, 2012 6:04:24 pm Andrew Boyer wrote:
While investigating a LACP issue, I turned on LACP_DEBUG on a debug kernel.
In this configuration it's easy to panic the kernel - just run 'ifconfig lagg0
laggproto lacp' on a
On 14 March 2012 09:40, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 3/11/12 1:06 AM, h bagade wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any way to add STP and RSTP protocols to bridge node on
netgraph? Should I implement it on the node or it has done before?
___
On 5 March 2012 18:46, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 3/4/12 1:36 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
Is this the correct mailer for such questions?
probably n...@freebsd.org would be better.
I do not understand why a bridge needs an interface type at all
it seems a very odd way to
From: hiren panchasara hiren.panchas...@gmail.com
I created bridge1 this way:
$ sudo ifconfig bridge create
Password:
bridge1
$ ifconfig bridge1
bridge1: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
ether 02:32:c8:92:b6:01
nd6
2012/2/25 Eugene Grosbein egrosb...@rdtc.ru:
25.02.2012 00:14, Eugene Grosbein пишет:
This problem occurs only when net.isr.direct=0/net.isr.direct_force=0.
And only when lagg1 has both ports up and running. And when I use oversized
pings.
At the same time, transit oversized pings go through
On 26 January 2011 02:32, Alexander Zagrebin a...@zagrebin.ru wrote:
Hi!
I've found some issues with the if_bridge on 8.2-PRERELEASE.
1. An ARP issue
Suppose we have a box with the 4 interfaces: nic0, nic1, nic2, nic3.
The interfaces are linked pairwise using 2 bridge(4) interfaces:
On 6 October 2010 09:19, Paul B Mahol one...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
If clang did not complain, I would probbaly never spot it.
Patch attached.
Committed.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
Revision 205024 - (annotate)
Thu Mar 11 17:56:46 2010 UTC (2 months, 3 weeks ago) by qingli
The if_tap interface is of IFT_ETHERNET type, but it
does not set or update the if_link_state variable.
As such RT_LINK_IS_UP() fails for the if_tap interface.
Also, the RT_LINK_IS_UP() needs to
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:08:36AM -0700, Peter Kieser wrote:
Hello,
I am experimenting with FreeBSD vlan's using the vlansinterface option in
rc.conf, my configuration is as follows:
ifconfig_em1=up
vlans_em1=100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
autobridge_interfaces=bridge0
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:27:43PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 11.12.2009 um 07:51 schrieb Chris Cowart:
Bruce Cran wrote:
I have a router configured using if_bridge with a 4-port NIC that's
serving addresses over DHCP. I'd like to add in either rtadvd or
DHCPv6, but neither work
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:12:25AM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Maybe this is a stupid question but I really don't understand why a
interface with IFF_DRV_OACTIVE can't be added to a lagg(4) interface.
Looking at OpenBSD code, they do this since
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:54:25PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote:
On Tuesday 22 December 2009 02:31:04 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:03:31PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote:
Ok, I am able to load firmware with:
uathload -d /dev/ugen4.3
but it also appears to do so
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:01:22PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:54:25PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote:
On Tuesday 22 December 2009 02:31:04 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:03:31PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote:
Ok, I am able to load firmware
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 03:29:11PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
I cc'ed those who seem to have put the most/recent effort into
sys/dev/wpi.
Is there any objection to turning off WPI_DEBUG by default? it creates
a lot of spam that the average user doesn't need. I use my 3945abg
every day and
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:48:02AM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
I need to find a way to do MAC address locking in FreeBSD -- that is, to
ensure that only a machine with a particular MAC address can use a
particular IP address. Unfortunately, it appears that rules in FreeBSD's
IPFW are stuck on
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 02:48:13PM +0200, Dieter Brozio wrote:
Hi there,
To whom it may concern:
INTEL released in March 2009 a new version 3.1 of its firmware version for
the WLAN iwi device (Pro/Wireless 2200BG).
http://ipw2200.sourceforge.net/firmware.php
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:14:04PM +0200, and...@brancatelli.it wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have a strange curiosity maybe you can clarify me :-)
Is it possible to do a LACP lagg connection directly between two hosts
using two gigalan and two crossed cables? Or maybe three... ;-)
Yes,
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:39:26PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
...
but if I create some vlan interfaces off lagg0
lagg0.100: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
1500
options=3RXCSUM,TXCSUM
ether 00:30:48:90:4c:fe
inet 192.168.100.1 netmask
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 03:23:57AM -0800, Noah Silverman wrote:
Hello,
I want to find a way to pass ALL traffic from my laptop THROUGH my office
VPN and then out to the Internet. This is a road warrior setup. This
gives me a few benefits: 1) I can check my email securely through VPN. 2)
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 07:12:24PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
SM
SM The highspeed counters are only there if this is a high-speed interface.
SM High speed means that the baudrate in the interface MIB (the one in the
SM kernel) must be larger than
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:08:00PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 19:27:49 Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 07:12:24PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
SM
SM The highspeed counters are only
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 05:00:59PM +0300, Sergey Listopad wrote:
Hi!
I am playing with bridge(4) stp feature.
there are 2 boxes with 7.0-RELEASE-p4.
rt1rt2
___ ___
||
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 12:49:49AM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:49:06AM -0400, Boris Kochergin wrote:
Ahoy. I've been using the patch for a while, and, recently, when the
load on the wireless network I needed it for has increased, I've started
getting kernel
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 06:41:45PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 09:32:10AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
and to be more explicit - the result of m_pullup is that
the number of bytes specified as m_pullup argument are in
a private piece of memory --
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 11:49:27PM -0500, Jacob Owens wrote:
Hello.
I've got a old sun V100 which features two gigabit ports (using dc driver).
I've been trying to get lagg failover working. on SPARC64 7.0 RELEASE
On the box I put the following in /etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_dc0=UP
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 12:13:09PM -1000, David Cornejo wrote:
hi,
i would like to bridge a wireless client to ethernet (in 8-CURRENT) -
the last bug in the if_bridge man page says this is a no-no.
The bridge man page needs to be updated as its possible to do this now.
the question is
The following reply was made to PR kern/125181; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andrew Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/125181: [ndis] [patch] with wep enters kdb.enter.unknown,
panics
Date: Thu, 17
should not work with two interfaces one of which
support TX and the other does not? At least if I turn on checksum offload
only on one of the interfaces the bridge is still working ...
Andrew Thompson wrote:
- cut -
This patch should do that, are you able to test it Stefan?
cheers
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 07:16:29PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:11:40PM +0300, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Greetings,
I just noticed, that when I add em network card to bridge the checksum
offload is turned off.
I even put in my rc.conf:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 07:16:29PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:11:40PM +0300, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Greetings,
I just noticed, that when I add em network card to bridge the checksum
offload is turned off.
I even put in my rc.conf:
The following reply was made to PR kern/125003; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andrew Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Shunsuke SHINOMIYA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/125003: incorrect EtherIP header format.
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:34:24 -0700
Hi
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 04:32:03AM -0400, Martes G Wigglesworth wrote:
Greetings all.
I have been attempting to research what I have been informed is
actually accomplished with layer-4 load balancing. I have seen many
articles and reviews that indicate that lagg(4) will accomplish the
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 04:20:48PM -0300, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
Hi list,
We have one machine with 3 nics configured with lagg(4). Each nic is
connected to a different switch, but only one is in active mode.
$ ifconfig -v lagg0
lagg0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 05:28:34PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
I've got a new box which features two gigabit ports and I though I'd try
lagg with LACP.
On the box I put the following in /etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_em0=up
ifconfig_em1=up
ifconfig_lagg0=laggproto lacp laggport em0
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:42:39AM -0400, Martes G Wigglesworth wrote:
I am sure this topic has been discussed before, however, I have been
coming across unanswered inquiries within the last two months about
possibly using the trunking aspect of 802.1q standard network routing,
with only
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:38:06PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote:
interface ethernet 1/g1
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 10
exit
I think this is an issue with default VLAN membership. I have this config
running on *hundreds* of servers without issue. Since Dell
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:51:38AM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote:
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote:
bridge0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
1500
ether 3e:7f:e8:ef:f6:a4
inet 192.168.0.1
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:58:53AM -0800, Chris wrote:
(I am reposting this. I posted to FreeBSD-Questions but
it appears OT for that list. I didn't come here first
because I felt it was too non-technical, but I'd appreciate
any insights)
I have 3 transparent firewalls on 3 T1s with a LAN
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:22:53AM +, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
As brought up in the thread Programming interface MAC filter without
enabling PROMISC on an interface from user space. it would seem that
if_bridge does not conform to IEEE 802.1D-2004. Which states:
quote
7.12.6 Reserved
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:59:22AM +, Tom Judge wrote:
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
SNIP
Personally I can't see why this approach would be a problem, but I am
not a expert. The address is defined in IEEE Std 802.1D-2004 as to not
be forwarded by bridges (which I interpret
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 10:35:11AM +, Peter Wood wrote:
Morning,
Looking thru the archives, it seems ng_one2many (in this case
'many2one') is what I am looking for. Am I barking the right tree
here?
Strangely enough this is the exact situation I was looking into on Friday
for two
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 04:25:01PM -0800, Peter Losher wrote:
I am currently working on a tcpdump collector where we have multiple
feeds coming in (via bge{0-8}). Since tcpdump can only poll one
interface per process, I was hoping to aggregate the traffic onto one
pseudo-interface for tcpdump
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:22:41PM +0300, Denis Barov wrote:
On Thu Nov 08, 2007 at 18:50:10 +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:00:00AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Denis Barov wrote:
Hi all!
I found, that port net-mgmt/bsd-airtools marked as broken:
BROKEN
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:00:00AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Denis Barov wrote:
Hi all!
I found, that port net-mgmt/bsd-airtools marked as broken:
BROKEN= Does not compile with GCC 4.2
but, it's not really so. It's broken after Wed Jul 11 21:25:48 2007 UTC
commit by
[EMAIL
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 08:23:20PM +0200, Ivo Vachkov wrote:
Hello all,
I'd like to ask if someone has information how many vlans a freebsd
box can 'run' ?
There is no limit. You can only add 4096 per interface of course as its
a 12bit tag. If you are adding a lot then you should use the
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 02:27:02AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Within my Linksys, I can restrict wireless to MAC addresses, as well as using
stuff like WPA ... quick search on google, and I found:
Hi,
This problem has always existed but now in RELENG_7+ since the vlan tag
is always stripped on the incoming packet its a little more obvious.
The bridging output function puts the mbuf directly on the interfaces
send queue so only network cards with VLAN_HWTAGGING will properly
re-tag any
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 02:59:44PM -0500, Erik Osterholm wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 08:46:53AM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:42:15PM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
Hi.
Does anyone know if it is possible to put a transparent bridge on a
vlan-trunk
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:42:15PM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
Hi.
Does anyone know if it is possible to put a transparent bridge on a
vlan-trunk?
As from rev1.100 of if_bridge back in June it will correctly use the
vlan number if the forwarding table so it is now possible to bridge a
vlan
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:01:04PM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
I don't know what you're trying to do
no surprise. i rarely do. :)
When you attach your wired nic to a bridge and and turn the bridge on
the nic gets set in promiscuous mode. This is likely why you can
ping the other
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 04:07:00PM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
current i386 thinkpad t41
ifconfig_lo0=inet 127.0.0.1/8
cloned_interfaces=bridge0
ifconfig_bridge0=inet 192.168.0.3/24 addm em0 addm ath0 up
ifconfig_em0=up
ifconfig_ath0=ssid rgnet up
defaultrouter=192.168.0.1
with ether
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 01:19:42PM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
Just to be sure...
good questions, thanks for asking
net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
# sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding
net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1
net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1
net.link.ether.bridge.config=em0,ath0
# sysctl
Hi,
I have been digging into why the edsc module wasnt being loaded by
ifconfig and now have a patch.
A few printfs showed the problem.
# ifconfig edsc0 create
ifmaybeload(edsc0)
trying to find if_edsc or edsc0
found @ ed
Its comparing using the string length of the module name so any partial
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:54:27AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
Hi,
I have been digging into why the edsc module wasnt being loaded by
ifconfig and now have a patch.
A few printfs showed the problem.
# ifconfig edsc0 create
ifmaybeload(edsc0)
trying to find if_edsc or edsc0
found
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:39:27PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:54:27AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
Hi,
I have been digging into why the edsc module wasnt being loaded by
ifconfig and now have a patch.
A few printfs showed the problem.
# ifconfig
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 02:11:59PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if if_bridge had been taught how to speak multiple
instance spanning tree?
Not yet. I havnt started it yet and I do not know of anyone else working
on it.
Andrew
___
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 02:16:20PM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:59:47PM +0200, mer mite wrote:
Hi All,
I'm looking for a way to provide ethernet interface bonding in FreeBSD
similar to ipmp in Solaris or just ethernet bonding in Linux. Don't want to
do
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 10:21:20PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 02:11:59PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if if_bridge had been taught how to speak multiple
instance spanning tree?
Not yet. I havnt started it yet and I do not know
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:08:38AM +0300, Shteryana Shopova wrote:
Hi,
I am getting the following LOR on my notebook -
iwi0: Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 2200BG mem 0xc840-0xc8400fff irq 21
at device 4.0 on pci2
iwi0: Ethernet address: 00:15:00:28:5c:dc
iwi0: [ITHREAD]
iwi0: link state
Hi,
I have been putting together a chapter on 'Link Aggregation and
Failover', any feedback/corrections/additions would be appreciated.
http://nzfug.nz.freebsd.org/nzfug/HandbookUpdates/NetworkAggregation
cheers,
Andrew
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 08:19:34PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
I'd like to create what might be called a non-bridge on a FreeBSD machine.
I'd like to put two Ethernet interfaces on the machine which have the same IP
address and subnet, and use those interfaces to communicate with clients.
Hi,
I have started updating the bridge section of the Handbook here,
http://nzfug.nz.freebsd.org/nzfug/HandbookUpdates/NetworkBridging
Any additions or corrections would be appreciated, just drop me an email.
cheers,
Andrew
___
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:45:05PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
Does any driver do this now? And if a driver were to coalesce
packets and send something up the stack that violates mss
will it barf?
It would barf for things like bridging where the packet gets spit out a
different interface. The
Please note the following change. trunk was only in HEAD for a week so
the few people who tried it out already need to be aware of the name
change.
Andrew
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 12:35:11AM +, Andrew Thompson wrote:
thompsa 2007-04-17 00:35:11 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 09:43:44AM +0100, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
I have come across this panic which appears to be from incorrect
refcounting on the inet6 multicast code.
I'm assuming this is in -CURRENT, as the refcount code has not yet been
MFCed.
Yes sorry
Hi,
I have come across this panic which appears to be from incorrect
refcounting on the inet6 multicast code.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ifconfig edsc0 create
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ifconfig edsc0 inet6 f00f::01
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ifconfig edsc0 destroy
Everything is ok...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ifconfig edsc0
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:37:57AM +0300, Niki Denev wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
Here is a patch to add OpenBSD's trunk(4) interface, and also includes
LACP support which came from agr(4) on NetBSD. Im interested in anyone
who wants to test this and in particular lacp mode if you have
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 03:01:09PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote:
Ran into a problem the other day and wanted to drop a note and see
if I should followup with a PR. Running a box as a bridging firewall
and ran into problem with giant packets being reported by the router
on one end and OSPF
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:37:57AM +0300, Niki Denev wrote:
I have fixed this up, a couple of spaces slipped into the Makefile.
I tried today to do the wireless/wired roaming, almost as given
in the man page, with the exception that my wireless interface (ath),
uses WPA, and i'm
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 04:42:14PM +0300, Niki Denev wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
Hi,
Here is a patch to add OpenBSD's trunk(4) interface, and also includes
LACP support which came from agr(4) on NetBSD. Im interested in anyone
who wants to test this and in particular lacp mode
Hi,
Here is a patch to add OpenBSD's trunk(4) interface, and also includes
LACP support which came from agr(4) on NetBSD. Im interested in anyone
who wants to test this and in particular lacp mode if you have a switch
that supports it.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:01:01PM +0200, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Hello,
I have 2 firewalls, and every of them have 2 bridged interfaces + STP ,
running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE
Unfortunately one of them is totally dead (hw problems) and I have to
make new one, but I plan to use
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:06:10PM -0500, Corey Smith wrote:
Please CC: me as I am off list.
I want to be able to create an 802.1q bridged trunk. This is nice if
you want layer 1 and 2 redundancy on an arbitrary number of logical
networks with only two physical network interfaces.
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:22:16PM +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote:
Ok, since no one want to provide an explanation I'll to do it myself.
...
I suggest to fix this problem in the other way, by checking if the
physical interface
is the dst interface by MAC. Eq if we got packet from Ci, it will be
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:42:42PM +0100, rmkml wrote:
Hi,
I have disabled/removed module on kernel, anyone ok,
but when I create bridge0 :
ifconfig bridge0 create
ifconfig: SIOCIFCREATE: Invalid argument
I just added options BRIDGE on my kernel conf.
uname -a : 6.2-RELEASE
ok if I add
Synopsis: bridge interface given in rc.conf not taking an (static) IP address
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-rc-freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: thompsa
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 27 08:58:47 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
This is a limitation of ifconfig rather than rc. The
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:18:49PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
Hi,
I have tested my 802.1p input patch with vlans configured. So far so good.
It is now available from:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~bms/dump/latest-8021p.diff
/*
* If the device did not perform decapsulation of
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 06:28:41PM +, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
This updated patch moves VLAN tag decapsulation into if_ethersubr.c and
always uses M_VLANTAG, which is also passed to the upper layer.
Tests with ping:
fxp (no VLAN_HWTAGGING support) OK
msk (VLAN_HWTAGGING enabled)
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 08:44:54PM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote:
John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 13:44, John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 12:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I go mad (no pun
intended.) :)
I was
haven't heard of problems like this so far.
I've Cc'ed Andrew Thompson which has imported if_bridge(4) from
OpenBSD into FreeBSD. He will likely be able to answer your question
and tell whether it is possible to bridge two VLAN interfaces
(attached to a physical interface) with another
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 05:45:50PM -0800, Kevin Sanders wrote:
I've written a kernel module that has pfil_add_hook'ed into the pfil
framework. When my input packet filter function is called, I can
mtod(*m, struct IP *) to the IP header, but haven't found a way to
find the original ethernet
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 09:06:26AM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 12:15:13PM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
Hi.
I have a bridge setup with a number of vlan IF's as members. After a
while traffic destined for one member IF are sent to all member
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 12:15:13PM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
Hi.
I have a bridge setup with a number of vlan IF's as members. After a
while traffic destined for one member IF are sent to all member IF's.
From man if_bridge:
A bridge works like a hub, forwarding traffic from one
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 12:11:06AM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
Hi,
Attached is a patch that brings in rapid spanning tree (802.1w)
support. I would appreciate any testing or code review. The states will
be printed out at the moment as packets are transfered and the topo is
calculated
Synopsis: [if_bridge] don't generate random L2 address
State-Changed-From-To: open-patched
State-Changed-By: thompsa
State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 8 19:42:02 UTC 2006
State-Changed-Why:
Committed. I decided not to include the link address in the example
as it shouldnt need to be set in the default
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:41:07AM +0100, Dunc wrote:
Hi folks,
I've been trying to create a layer2 VPN using FreeBSD boxes as the gateways.
The 2 methods I thought of are:-
a) Create a tunnel between the 2 gateways using gif interfaces, and
bridge the gifs onto a real NIC.
Both
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:32:15AM +0100, Dunc wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:41:07AM +0100, Dunc wrote:
Hi folks,
I've been trying to create a layer2 VPN using FreeBSD boxes as the
gateways.
This should work fine with vlan headers, do you have any
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 05:04:12PM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
Hello.
I am trying to limit arp-broadcast between member-IF on a bridge
(if_bridge) with no luck.
I have the following sysctls set:
net.link.bridge.pfil_member: 1
net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge: 1
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:19:41PM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
Hi.
According to man if_bridge one could filter L2-traffic with ipfw:
From man if_bridge:
ARP and REVARP packets are forwarded without being filtered and others
that are not IP nor IPv6 packets are not forwarded when
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 08:38:02AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Andrew, good day!
The check for ARP happens before the ipfw layer2 code so it isnt
currently possible to filter them.
switch (ether_type) {
case ETHERTYPE_ARP:
case ETHERTYPE_REVARP:
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
