From: Gleb Smirnoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kernel mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD?
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:43:52 +0300
Junho,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:42:27PM +0900, CHOI Junho wrote:
C I understand what you mean. If so, why serious network server like nfs
C is still in kernel
From: Max Laier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kernel mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD?
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:19:45 +0100
On Monday 07 February 2005 10:20, CHOI Junho wrote:
Anyone knows about kernel-mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD? (just like tux
of linuxI searched several times but failed
Anyone knows about kernel-mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD? (just like tux
of linuxI searched several times but failed.
--
CHOI Junho http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key fingerprint = 1369 7374 A45F F41A F3C0 07E3 4A01 C020 E602 60F5
*delay situations. (in progress)
What a wonderful idea. Can't wait for the bikesheds...
Me too. Also it would be very helpful if we have Selective ACK(SACK) feature.
--
CHOI Junho http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh KFUG cjh at kr.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Project cjh at FreeBSD.orgWeb Data Bank
Hi,
Is there any patches of SACK for 4.9? I found patches against 4.3 but
it is very hard to apply.
--
CHOI Junho http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh KFUG cjh at kr.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Project cjh at FreeBSD.orgWeb Data Bank cjh at wdb.co.kr
Key fingerprint = 1369 7374 A45F F41A F3C0
.
You probably need to bump up KVA_PAGES to fit in all the extra mbuf
clusters you're allocating.
Can you tell me in more detail?
Mike Silby Silbersack
Thanks,
--
CHOI Junho http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh KFUG cjh at kr.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Project cjh at FreeBSD.orgWeb Data Bank
After more investigation, I realized the problem is on the router
side. I think the problem is solved... Thanks.
From: Mike Silbersack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD - Windows HTTP TCP performance
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:12:34 -0600 (CST)
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, CHOI Junho wrote
dependency for mbufclusters value? (e.g. RAM size,
kern.maxusers value or etc)
p.s. RAM is 2G, Xeon 2.0G x 1 or 2 machines.
--
CHOI Junho http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh KFUG cjh at kr.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Project cjh at FreeBSD.orgWeb Data Bank cjh at wdb.co.kr
Key fingerprint = 1369 7374 A45F
From: Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD - Windows HTTP TCP performance
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:30:23 +0100
CHOI Junho wrote:
For those who interested, I made packet dump file:
http://www.kr.freebsd.org/~cjh/misc/freebsd-net/
Best thing is do tcpdump
Hi,
Our company's web service has noticable difference serving Windows
HTTP clients(IE) (98, 2000, XP). It is relatively slow comparing
Windows - Windows case.
- FreeBSD(4.7,4.8,4.9) thttpd/apache/builtin ftpd - Windows 2000 : 300-800Kbytes/sec
- Windows 2000 IIS(no optimization) - Windows
: 35046MB (71775284 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4467C)
--
CHOI Junho http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh KFUG cjh at kr.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Project cjh at FreeBSD.orgWeb Data Bank cjh at wdb.co.kr
Key fingerprint = 1369 7374 A45F F41A F3C0 07E3 4A01 C020 E602 60F5
of gigabit networking?
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:00:14 -0500
You're not running out of mbufs or clusters, you're out of RAM.
Don't bump up nmbclusters anymore because you don't need to; instead,
add more RAM.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:05:51PM +0900, CHOI Junho wrote:
Hi,
I am
, and reload again. That's why I try
thttpd patched to use sendfile() instead of mmap().
--
CHOI Junho http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh KFUG cjh at kr.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Project cjh at FreeBSD.orgWeb Data Bank cjh at wdb.co.kr
Key fingerprint = 1369 7374 A45F F41A F3C0 07E3 4A01 C020 E602
net.inet.tcp.inflight_enable=1
kernel configuration is not specially tuned, except DEVICE_POLLING and
HZ=2000.
--
CHOI Junho http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh KFUG cjh at kr.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Project cjh at FreeBSD.orgWeb Data Bank cjh at wdb.co.kr
Key fingerprint = 1369 7374 A45F F41A F3C0
connections, but each is pulling a large amount of
bandwidth?
That will make a difference on what tweaks I'd suggest to use on the
machine.
--
David Rhodus
--
CHOI Junho http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh KFUG cjh at kr.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Project cjh at FreeBSD.orgWeb Data Bank cjh
then).
So another problem comes with kern.ipc.nsfbufs -- I tried to
increase arbitrary values but it also cause kernel panic.
Final: What is a good math for calculating these values safely?
kern.ipc.nmbclusters
kern.ipc.nsfbufs
From: CHOI Junho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Performance
it
is not implemented at least in 4.7. Is there any patches for
implementing it or still it is to-do features? Or do we have a
reason why bridge+ipfw fwd is impossible?
p.s. Please keep me on Cc:.
--
CHOI Junho http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh cjh at kr.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Project cjh
Mbps Full Duplex
I updated em0 driver to 1.3.8 from Intel webpage, but it no helps.
Can you suggest some advice? If not, I have to back to 4.5R-p5.
--
+++ Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my employers +++
CHOI Junho [sleeping now]http
only has one 1000baseSX interface. em/gx doesn't support
1000baseSX type cable?
--
+++ Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my employers +++
CHOI Junho [sleeping now]http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh
[while sleeping] cjh @ kr.FreeBSD.ORG cjh @ FreeBSD.ORG cjh
From: CHOI Junho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 1000baseSX support in em/gx/wx?
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 18:51:28 +0900 (KST)
Recently I have a chance to test Gigabit ethernet card based on
82543GC-F chipset based(Intel Pro/1000 F adapter, I think. It is at
data center so I didn't see the board
) but I can't get good answers.
p.s. I am doing NAT + Transparent Proxy in my home(ADSL). It works nicely.
--
+++ Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my employers +++
CHOI Junho [sleeping now]http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh
[while sleeping] cjh
21 matches
Mail list logo
