On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 12:51 AM Peter A Barlow
wrote:
> I’m looking at running FreeBSD on an old Firebox M270.
> It has a C3558 CPU with integrated X553 LAN controller which connects over
> MDIO to a Marvell 88E6190 switch.
> Out of the box the X553 backplane is detected but there doesn’t seem
Hi,
I'm not sure how to help here; it looks like there's either an issue with
the firmware or a physical issue with the cage. Though, another option you
could try would be to download the latest driver from the Intel Download
Center and see if that works. If not, then also try the NVMupdate
I think Benoit may be referring to this bug?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265207
>From that, it looks like his cards are QLogic ones that use the qlnxe
driver. As for who would know what to do about that ioctl issue, I don't
know. I'm not sure if the driver has an active
Hi, I have a Phabricator review here that I was hoping to get some feedback
on: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D34742
In short, there's already some functionality in current and 13.1-RELEASE
that allows a driver to pick a TX queue for a packet, but this extends that
support to have iflib do some
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 7:01 AM Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 28. Feb 2022, at 15:51, Mark Johnston wrote:
>
> Do you have any idea what triggers the message in the first place? I
> haven't seen it on my igb-using systems.
>
>
> No but I have hardware here that does this. Short
On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 6:59 PM John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> I have a dual port igb card:
> igb0: port 0x2020-0x203f mem
> 0xd102-0xd103,0xd0c0-0xd0ff,0xd1044000-0xd1047fff irq 17 at
> device 0.0 on pci3
> igb0: Using 1024 TX descriptors and 1024 RX descriptors
> igb0: Using 4 RX
I'll add Piotr, the author of your linked patch, to this thread.
Are you seeing a problem connected to the watchdog? Piotr tells me that
IFLIB_QUEUE_WORKING isn't used now, but it wasn't even used before his
patch.
- Eric
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:47 AM Ryan Stone wrote:
>
Like Konstantin said, it might only be possible on some e1000 cards. Could
you tell me which card you're using? If the device name shows up as igb,
then it's likely it does support it.
That said, I'm not an expert on HW timestamping, so I'm not sure what
features are supported or how well they're
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:29 PM Eric Joyner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:02 PM Eric Joyner wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 4:24 PM Mark Johnston wrote:
>>
>>> I spent some time looking at the core. It looks like we have yet
>>> another problem: th
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:02 PM Eric Joyner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 4:24 PM Mark Johnston wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 02:34:50PM -0700, Eric Joyner wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:29 PM Mark Johnston wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Mon, Apr
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 4:24 PM Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 02:34:50PM -0700, Eric Joyner wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:29 PM Mark Johnston wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 02:19:25PM -0700, Eric Joyner wrote:
> > > > Mark,
&g
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:29 PM Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 02:19:25PM -0700, Eric Joyner wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > I think I was mistaken about the backtrace looking the same. I was
> looking
> > at it from wit
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:28 PM Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:14:20PM -0700, Eric Joyner wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > I tried out a kernel with the tip of CURRENT with both D24214 and D24215
> > applied, and I still see the problem. As
ic
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 1:19 PM Eric Joyner wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 3:52 PM Mark Johnston wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 04:32:40PM -0700, Eric Joyner wrote:
>> > Mark,
>> >
>> > I did get some time to get back and retry this; however your sec
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 3:52 PM Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 04:32:40PM -0700, Eric Joyner wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > I did get some time to get back and retry this; however your second patch
> > still doesn't solve the problem. Looking i
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 2:22 PM Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 01:30:47PM -0800, Eric Joyner wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:44 AM Eric Joyner wrote:
> > > Hi Mark,
> > >
> > > I applied your patch to a FreeBSD-current VM and reran the
Have you tried turning off jumbo frames?
- Eric
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:04 PM KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I wonder how to work ixgbe in 1GbE network. I tried to test
> in below:
>
> internet
> |
> +---++
> | Netgear JGS516 |
> +---+-+--+
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:44 AM Eric Joyner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 7:09 PM Mark Johnston wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 02:12:05AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> > On 2020-01-29 22:44, Eric Joyner wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 1:41
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 7:09 PM Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 02:12:05AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > On 2020-01-29 22:44, Eric Joyner wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 1:41 PM Hans Petter Selasky
> wrote:
> > >
> > > &
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:12 PM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 2020-01-29 22:44, Eric Joyner wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 1:41 PM Hans Petter Selasky
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2020-01-29 22:30, Eric Joyner wrote:
> >>> Hi freebsd-net,
> >>&
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 1:41 PM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 2020-01-29 22:30, Eric Joyner wrote:
> > Hi freebsd-net,
> >
> > We've encountered an issue with unloading the iavf(4) driver on FreeBSD
> > 12.1 (and stable). On a VM with two iavf(4) interfaces, i
Hi freebsd-net,
We've encountered an issue with unloading the iavf(4) driver on FreeBSD
12.1 (and stable). On a VM with two iavf(4) interfaces, if we send heavy
traffic to iavf1 and try to kldunload the driver, the kldunload process
hangs on iavf0 until iavf1 stops receiving traffic.
After some
I think that sounds right; but Adrian is the one who put the code in the
#ifdef RSS blocks in. We don't have it enabled/defined in our testing here.
- Eric
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 8:01 PM Sepherosa Ziehau
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am on the way to cleanup the UDP_IPV4_EX bit.
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10425
I didn't add any reviewers yet because we have yet to test this, and I
didn't have a good idea of who would be interested in these. Suggestions on
the string to give the active optical/copper cable types would be welcome;
I gave them the acronyms I saw in
Other OEMs can make their own designs that use Intel chips -- e.g. Silicom
makes a 6-port full height SFP card that combines a 4-port I350AM4 with a
2-port I350 AM2.
It's just that the further away you get from an Intel design, the less
support we'll be able to give you if something goes wrong.
There are SFP i350 cards, but hopefully this one has a valid eeprom and
isn't counterfeit. I remember someone submitted a bug for ixgbe where the
device ID showed up as 0x0001 and they wanted to patch that into the driver.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:02 AM Jack Vogel wrote:
>
I'll add Jeff to this conversation since he might know more about specific
interactions between our cards and switches. I'll see if anyone else
internally knows something, too.
As for where to go from here, I don't know what else you can do other than
contact Intel support.
- Eric
On Mon, Aug
(Replying-all this time)
Did you try to set these settings that ESnet recommends?
https://fasterdata.es.net/host-tuning/freebsd/
We don't use iperf3 here at Intel (we use netperf instead), so I'm not sure
I can be much help diagnosing what's wrong.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:39 PM Chris Dunbar
I think a better fix here is to have the driver not call init_locked() when
the driver is not running when setting the MTU.
It looks like all the other Intel network drivers do the same thing as this
for the MTU.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:47 AM Arnaud YSMAL
wrote:
>
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I think the early versions of the description of the command were vague, so
that's why it got everyone. We caught it and fixed it a few days ago
internally.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, 8:37 AM Jack Vogel wrote:
> LOL, Damn, what's the world coming to when you can't trust them Linux
Bruce mostly has it right -- ITR is the minimum latency between interrupts.
But, it does actually guarantee a minimum period between interrupts.
Though, Fortville actually is unique a little bit in that there is another
ITR setting that can ensure a certain average number of interrupts per
second
Bump -- I'd be okay with adding hooks to at least one Intel ethernet driver
for whatever comes out of this.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:47 AM Sepherosa Ziehau
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Oct 16, 2015, at
I don't know where that email goes, either. You should really open a bug
report; it'll be something to start off of in investigating the issue.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:01 AM Sossi Andrej wrote:
> Kristof Provost je 02. 10. 2015 ob 13:24 napisal:
> > On 2015-10-02 12:28:12
Not yet; I think I will be able to get to it soon.
- Eric
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:09 AM Evgeny Khorokhorin j...@maxnet.ru wrote:
Hi Eric,
Did you manage to try this problem?
- Evgeny
19.08.2015 23:16, Eric Joyner пишет:
Yeah; it should be able to do up to 64 queues for the PF's
The IXLV_MAX_QUEUES value is for the VF driver; the standard driver should
be able to allocate and properly use up to 64 queues.
That said, you're only getting rx traffic on the first 16 queues, so that
looks like a bug in the driver. I'll take a look at it.
- Eric
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:00
from if_ixl.c and ixl_txrx.c:
#ifndef IXL_STANDALONE_BUILD
#include opt_inet.h
#include opt_inet6.h
#include opt_rss.h
#endif
because RSS for is only in HEAD
Could I break smth by doing this?
Best regards,
Evgeny Khorokhorin
19.08.2015 21:17, Eric Joyner пишет
Sorry for the delay; it looked fine to me, but I never got back to you.
- Eric
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:16 PM Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It's fine by me. Please do it!
-a
On 13 July 2015 at 13:05, hiren panchasara hi...@freebsd.org wrote:
Here is the patch I'd
I guess I could reverse-MFC r283668, then, to make that work on HEAD.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015, 12:07 PM Stefano Garzarella
stefanogarzare...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to compile FreeBSD-head with only device ix (without device
ixv) but the build failed.
I fixed this behavior using this
Are there any log messages printed out by the driver? The sysctls don't
really look out of the ordinary, other than the number of sub-64 byte
packets.
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:10 AM Guy Helmer guy.hel...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 21, 2015, at 8:52 AM, Christopher Forgeron csforge...@gmail.com
erj added a subscriber: freebsd-net.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1965
To: erj, gnn, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail
erj added a reviewer: adrian.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1965
To: erj, gnn, jfvogel, adrian
Cc: freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail
be important to consider the do we
need an ethtool-equivalent discussion.
And I think we've lost a bunch of people who were in the original
discussion from the to:/cc: list.
---
- Eric Joyner
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 02:17:44PM
It does look good! We already have at least a half-dozen new media types to
add.
---
- Eric Joyner
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Looks good to me.
Thanks for doing this!
-a
On 16 February 2015 at 17:50, Mike Karels m...@karels.net wrote
erj added a subscriber: erj.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1711
To: rrs, gnn, rwatson, imp, hselasky, adrian, sbruno, lstewart
Cc: erj, freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
Then going with what Mike says about leaving backwards compatibility, I
suppose we should do something like what Adrian suggested, and add a
separate struct. We can indicate that the separate struct exists by setting
the media type value in the if_media word to 0xc0, since that's the last
unused
, at 01:05, Eric Joyner e...@erj.cc wrote:
This is a continuation of a discussion from off the list:
ixgbe needs to support devices with media types that aren't in
if_media.h;
for now those are 10GBaseKR, 10GBaseKX4, and 1000baseKX. Immediately,
we're
running into the issue
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Alexander V. Chernikov
melif...@freebsd.org wrote:
There is a problem with correct media reporting in ixgbe:
ixgbe_setup_optics() is called only at ixgbe_attach().
This means that:
1) if SFP slot was empty at the attach() time, media part will be set to
So, what are the two fields on the media line for?
AFAICT, it looks like the first field is the media the user wants to use
(so the driver typically sets it to Ethernet autoselect by default?), and
the
second field is for the media that's active in the interface.
---
- Eric Joyner
I approve of this patch -- I tested it on ixl and ixlv on stable/10, and at
least the sysctl stats still look good.
---
- Eric Joyner
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 5:08 AM, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:18:51PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
R The patch below
As a random person without commit privileges, I hope so, too.
---
- Eric Joyner
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Sean Bruno sbr...@ignoranthack.me wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 12:58 +1000, Nigel Williams wrote:
On 17/09/14 08:48, Sean Bruno wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 11:32 +1000, Nigel
This looks good to me. The only comment I have is that according to the
I350 datasheet, DROP_EN is already set on all the queues but 0 by default,
but I haven't checked for the other adapters covered by igb.
---
- Eric Joyner
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote
Getting local / remote faults is strange; are these stats from after you
rebooted?
---
- Eric Joyner
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Marcelo Gondim gon...@bsdinfo.com.br
wrote:
On 05/09/2014 17:17, Marcelo Gondim wrote:
On 05/09/2014 16:49, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
But is the airflow
Let me remove my concerns earlier in the thread -- this patch won't
negatively affect any of our drivers; and the problem I mentioned with ixl
would require a change somewhere further up the stack.
---
- Eric Joyner
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
Hans
spans more than six mbufs and then m_defrag()'s the entire
chain if one exists; it's less than optimal but necessary to prevent errors.
- Eric
---
- Eric Joyner
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org
wrote:
Hi,
I've tested the attached patch with success
I unofficially approve of it!
---
Eric Joyner
On Aug 16, 2014 12:21 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov melif...@yandex-team.ru
wrote:
Hello Jack!
Can you please commit (or let me commit) the following one-liner?
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
56 matches
Mail list logo