[Differential] D25681: if_spppsubr: Define a few LCP options, Recognize (but still reject) multilink PPP config options

2020-07-16 Thread eugen_grosbein.net (Eugene Grosbein)
eugen_grosbein.net removed subscribers: freebsd-net-list, emaste. eugen_grosbein.net added a comment. Sorry for the mess, my latest actions on this differential were unintentional, some problems with old Firefox. REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION

[Differential] D25681: if_spppsubr: Define a few LCP options, Recognize (but still reject) multilink PPP config options

2020-07-16 Thread eugen_grosbein.net (Eugene Grosbein)
eugen_grosbein.net reclaimed this revision. REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25681/new/ REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25681 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To:

[Differential] D25681: if_spppsubr: Define a few LCP options, Recognize (but still reject) multilink PPP config options

2020-07-16 Thread eugen_grosbein.net (Eugene Grosbein)
eugen_grosbein.net commandeered this revision. eugen_grosbein.net added a reviewer: neel_neelc.org. REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25681/new/ REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25681 EMAIL PREFERENCES

[Differential] D12457: Complete INADDR_HASH lock protection

2017-09-27 Thread eugen_grosbein.net (Eugene Grosbein)
eugen_grosbein.net marked an inline comment as done. eugen_grosbein.net added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > ae wrote in if_stf.c:383 > Using in_localip() is preferred, because INADDR_HASH is protected with rmlock > only in head/ and stable/11. So if you plan to merge this into stable/10,

[Differential] D12457: Complete INADDR_HASH lock protection

2017-09-26 Thread eugen_grosbein.net (Eugene Grosbein)
eugen_grosbein.net marked an inline comment as done. REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12457 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: eugen_grosbein.net, ae, avg, mav, rwatson Cc: bz, imp,

[Differential] D12457: Complete INADDR_HASH lock protection

2017-09-26 Thread eugen_grosbein.net (Eugene Grosbein)
eugen_grosbein.net marked 2 inline comments as done. REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12457 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: eugen_grosbein.net, ae, avg, mav, rwatson Cc: bz, imp,

[Differential] D12457: Complete INADDR_HASH lock protection

2017-09-26 Thread eugen_grosbein.net (Eugene Grosbein)
eugen_grosbein.net marked an inline comment as done. eugen_grosbein.net added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > mav wrote in in_mcast.c:1383 > Do I miss some other protection means or this and few below places just > scream about possible races due to missing interface pointer pulled out of >

[Differential] D12457: Complete INADDR_HASH lock protection

2017-09-26 Thread eugen_grosbein.net (Eugene Grosbein)
eugen_grosbein.net marked 2 inline comments as done. eugen_grosbein.net added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12457#258249, @rwatson wrote: > Many of these changes are not sufficient to address the underlying problems in this code, as the lock covers loop iteration but fails

[Differential] D12457: Complete INADDR_HASH lock protection

2017-09-22 Thread eugen_grosbein.net (Eugene Grosbein)
eugen_grosbein.net marked an inline comment as done. eugen_grosbein.net added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > mav wrote in if_stf.c:383 > Wouldn't it be better to use in_localip() here instead of code duplication? > Or I miss something? in_localip() may be better, I just wished to make the

[Differential] D12457: Complete INADDR_HASH lock protection

2017-09-22 Thread eugen_grosbein.net (Eugene Grosbein)
eugen_grosbein.net created this revision. Herald added a subscriber: imp. REVISION SUMMARY If a system has dynamic ever changing set of IP addresses, it can panic due to unprotected access to global INADDR_HASH in several kernel subsystems: ip_input.c, in_mcast.c, if_stf(4). There was

[Differential] D9270: Add support for user-supplied Host-Uniq tag and handle PADM messages in Netgraph PPPoE

2017-08-29 Thread eugen_grosbein.net (Eugene Grosbein)
eugen_grosbein.net accepted this revision. REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9270 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: ale, #manpages, wblock, #network, julian, mav, adrian, glebius,

[Differential] D9270: Add support for user-supplied Host-Uniq tag and handle PADM messages in Netgraph PPPoE

2017-08-22 Thread eugen_grosbein.net (Eugene Grosbein)
eugen_grosbein.net added a comment. > No, I'm not asking for support that would take a few weeks of ping pong in a bug tracker, if any. This is real world feedback for this review. Take it or leave it. :) I was going to deal with this problem but I need mentioned details to start with.

[Differential] D9270: Add support for user-supplied Host-Uniq tag and handle PADM messages in Netgraph PPPoE

2017-08-22 Thread eugen_grosbein.net (Eugene Grosbein)
eugen_grosbein.net added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9270#251108, @franco_opnsense.org wrote: > Thanks, but we've narrowed it down to this commit. Anyway, Bugzilla should be used for bug reports. Don't forget to describe how did you narrowed it to the commit in

[Differential] D9270: Add support for user-supplied Host-Uniq tag and handle PADM messages in Netgraph PPPoE

2017-08-22 Thread eugen_grosbein.net (Eugene Grosbein)
eugen_grosbein.net added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9270#251087, @franco_opnsense.org wrote: > We do seem to have a persistent problem with this patch in some PPPoE environments that will cause a crash in ng_pppoe_rcvdata_ether(): > > https://ibb.co/mRWKHF >