Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
However, the request/respones tests are awfull for my notebook
(test repeated on the notebook for the sake of conviction) :
Is it possible to rerun these tests with a 7.0 kernel of the same
general
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
However, the request/respones tests are awfull for my notebook (test
repeated on the notebook for the sake of conviction) :
Is it possible to rerun these tests with a 7.0 kernel of the same general
configuration? That would help us determine if
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:30:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Noyou misunderstood. The 7.1 box was connected to a 5.4 box doing a 50GB
data transfer over rsync. Both nics were 1000 full duplex with a crossover
cable.
The speed performance was terrible and I could only get up to 10
Dear Pyun,
thanx for your prompt answer (as usual).
Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:21:00PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Hello,
I've serious network performance problems on a HP Turion X2
based brand new notebook; I only used a
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
However, the request/respones tests are awfull for my notebook (test
repeated on the notebook for the sake of conviction) :
Is it possible to rerun these tests with a 7.0 kernel of the same general
configuration? That would help us determine if
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:10:29PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
However, the request/respones tests are awfull for my notebook (test
repeated on the notebook for the sake of conviction) :
Is it possible to rerun these tests with a 7.0 kernel
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Holger Kipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:30:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Noyou misunderstood. The 7.1 box was connected to a 5.4 box doing a 50GB
data transfer over rsync. Both nics were 1000 full duplex with a crossover
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 04:12:56PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
[...]
AFAIK it seems that you're the first one that reports poor
performance issue of MCP65.
someone must be ;) no kiddin, I am not convinced this is (only)
a driver issue (cf. bad NFS/UDP performance thread on
I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over
50GB
from a FreeBSD 5.4 box to my new Dell running 7.1. Used a crossover cable
and
the link was 1000 full duplex, but could only get about 10M/s. Very odd.
Did a
tcpdump and saw lots of bad checksum errors.
What other
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over
50GB
from a FreeBSD 5.4 box to my new Dell running 7.1. Used a crossover cable
and
the link was 1000 full duplex, but could only get about 10M/s. Very
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over
50GB
from a FreeBSD 5.4 box to my new Dell running 7.1. Used a crossover cable
and
the link was 1000 full duplex, but could only get about 10M/s. Very
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Gary Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over
50GB
from a FreeBSD 5.4 box to my new Dell running 7.1. Used a crossover
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:15:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Gary Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:15:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Gary Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over
50GB
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:30:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:15:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Gary Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:21:00PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Hello,
I've serious network performance problems on a HP Turion X2
based brand new notebook; I only used a 7-1Beta CD and
7-STABLE on this thing.
Scp-ing ports.tgz from a rock-stable 7-STABLE server to it gives
16 matches
Mail list logo
