On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 07:13:04PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
If you want to send me the node you have writen I can
make the diffs and send it back :-)
thanks Julian, but i prefer to do it myself,
cause i want to understand how the hell netgraph works... =)
btw, i think i did the
hi, there!
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote:
And while you are listening, i can show u something else... =)
I have NETGRAPH in my kernel, and this is what i get when i
try to load ng_ether the first time:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# kldload ng_ether
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote:
btw, i think i did the converion and it was quite straightforward,
but i've still a little problem that i didn't have in 5.x:
if i try to unload my module, change the internals, compile
and use it again, it fails! =P
I
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 04:16:41PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote:
well, i answer to myself:
it seems it's not my mistake, cause you can trigger it with a
plain original tee node too. =P
Ok, i promise this is the last msg:
it was my mistake, whe i deleted the tee node, the ether
node short
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Paolo Pisati wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 04:16:41PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote:
well, i answer to myself:
it seems it's not my mistake, cause you can trigger it with a
plain original tee node too. =P
Ok, i promise this is the last msg:
it was my
As the subject says,
i developed a netgraph node (it's classifier node)
using a 5.x box but tonight, i had a bad
surprise:
it seems the netgraph implemntation in 4.x and 5.x
are different, so now.
Could someone shed some light on the differences, please?
Thanks.
--
Paolo
GUFI:
Netgraph in 5.0 had to be alterred to support SMP locking.
at teh same time some 'simplificatiosn were made, however changing a
driver from one, to work witht he orther is relatively simple..
Major changes:
Instead of passing separate message and o-o-band data, both are
attached to a single
