Re: FreeBSD route tables limited 16?

2010-09-14 Thread Dave Seddon
at the vnet jails, yet. Will do. Thanks. Kind regards, Dave -Original Message- From: Julian Elischer jul...@elischer.org To: d...@seddon.ca Cc: Andrew Hannam andr...@itsallaboutbiz.com, FreeBSD Net n...@freebsd.org, Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD route tables limited 16

Re: FreeBSD route tables limited 16?

2010-09-14 Thread Aleksandr A Babaylov
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 04:31:39PM +1000, Dave Seddon wrote: It sounds like dedicating some space for this in the mbuf would be the best way forward, but the question is how much. I'm worried that most freebsd users won't go for lots of route tables, which is why you went for 4 bits

Re: FreeBSD route tables limited 16? (mbuf changes)

2010-09-14 Thread Julian Elischer
On 9/13/10 11:31 PM, Dave Seddon wrote: Greetings, Thanks for the quick response. It sounds like dedicating some space for this in the mbuf would be the best way forward, but the question is how much. I'm worried that most freebsd users won't go for lots of route tables, which is why you went

Re: FreeBSD route tables limited 16?

2010-09-13 Thread Julian Elischer
On 9/13/10 5:18 PM, Dave Seddon wrote: Greetings Julian, I've been wondering if it's possible to increase the number of FreeBSD route tables to a larger number. It seems this is currently 4 bits, however I was wondering about perhaps 16 bits? Yes the code is designed to handle many more and