-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does anyone have a favourite tool for analysing tcp flows to easily figure
out why a transfer is slow?
Wireshark is good for interactively examining a tcpdump trace between
two hosts. It will point out
Okay. libpcap 0.9.8 and tcpdump 3.9.8 are now imported into HEAD and
RELENG_7. Is anyone eager to pull it down to RELENG_6 as well, because I
don't have the resources available at the moment. The update was crucial
to me in HEAD and RELENG_7 to get a working pflog tcpdump, but RELENG_6
After 1.49 src/etc/rc.firewall setup_loopback() is called in any
firewall type including custom firewall defined filename.
I think setup_loopback() should be called for predefined firewalls.
--
Igor Sysoev
http://sysoev.ru/en/
___
Netan wrote:
Hello
I am using the CURRENT release. I wish to dump the kernel routing table. I
think there was a sysctl interface in 4.x FreeBSD release to print it from
userspace. Is there a way to do it now ?..
Sunny
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
On 10/18/07, Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does anyone have a favourite tool for analysing tcp flows to easily figure
out why a transfer is slow?
I am hoping for something that can help visualise the flow as one of those
two timeline poles with
On 10/19/07, Stephen Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Netan wrote:
Hello
I am using the CURRENT release. I wish to dump the kernel routing table.
I
think there was a sysctl interface in 4.x FreeBSD release to print it
from
userspace. Is there a way to do it now ?..
Sunny
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi,
In an effort to connect my 2 machines up -- the FreeBSD 8-CURRENT and
the Windows box, for filesharing via SMB I've installed samba3 and done that
song and dance to get things to work. The really weird thing is that my 2
machines will talk via
Sten Daniel Soersdal wrote:
Len Gross wrote:
Thanks so much for the response. Here is some additional information.
I'm trying to emulate an RF network where there are colisions (e.g.
Aloha
type protocol) so I actually need collisions! I had forgotten that
modern
hardware
essentially
Len Gross wrote:
Thanks so much for the response. Here is some additional information.
I'm trying to emulate an RF network where there are colisions (e.g. Aloha
type protocol) so I actually need collisions! I had forgotten that modern
hardware
essentially eliminated them. So, lets
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Could I hide an IPv6 network behind NAT? I don't know if that is even
possible
... the IPv6 IPs would be private (equiv to 192.168.x.x) ... basically, none
of
the hosts behind NAT need a public IP, *but* I may end up with more then 256
hosts, so was wondering
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Just to clarify, how are the two hooked together? Is it over gigabit
switch, a 10mbps hub, or directly cabled together?
-Mike
Sure. They're both connected over a gigabit switch, but the Windows
driver's kind of sketchy because it keeps on
I'm running a pair of VIA C7 mini-ITX carp(4)ed 6.2-STABLE boxes with one
if_vr and three if_re RealTek 8169S Single-chip Gigabit Ethernet NICs. vr
is used for pfsync and all re interfaces have carp. I'm unable to run any
kernel newer than April 11th, 2007 without getting something along the
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi,
In an effort to connect my 2 machines up -- the FreeBSD 8-CURRENT
and the Windows box, for filesharing via SMB I've installed samba3
and done that song and dance to get things to work. The really weird
thing is that
Old Synopsis: loading routing management commands from file
New Synopsis: [patch] route(8): loading routing management commands from file
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs-freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Oct 19 23:14:10 UTC 2007
Hi,
In an effort to connect my 2 machines up -- the FreeBSD 8-CURRENT
and the Windows box, for filesharing via SMB I've installed samba3
and done that song and dance to get things to work. The really weird
thing is that my 2 machines will talk via ICMP with one another, but
not via TCP
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi,
In an effort to connect my 2 machines up -- the FreeBSD 8-CURRENT
and the Windows box, for filesharing via SMB I've installed samba3
and done that song and dance to get things to work. The really weird
thing is that
Len Gross wrote:
Thanks so much for the response. Here is some additional information.
I'm trying to emulate an RF network where there are colisions (e.g. Aloha
type protocol) so I actually need collisions! I had forgotten that modern
hardware
essentially eliminated them. So, lets say I can
Hello
I am using the CURRENT release. I wish to dump the kernel routing table. I
think there was a sysctl interface in 4.x FreeBSD release to print it from
userspace. Is there a way to do it now ?..
Sunny
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
On 10/19/07, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Could I hide an IPv6 network behind NAT? I don't know if that is even
possible
Yes, it is possible. The designers of IPv6 allowed for that
configuration as it was expected to be a common
On 10/19/07, Jonathan Noack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in the process of upgrading my web/database/nfs/jack-of-all-trades box
from 6.2 to RELENG_7. I figured now would be a good time to clean up my
kernel config files. I have the following in my old kernel config:
# Statically Link in
* Jonathan Noack [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071018 20:59] wrote:
I'm in the process of upgrading my web/database/nfs/jack-of-all-trades box
from 6.2 to RELENG_7. I figured now would be a good time to clean up my
kernel config files. I have the following in my old kernel config:
# Statically Link
On Friday 19 October 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Could I hide an IPv6 network behind NAT? I don't know if that is even
possible ... the IPv6 IPs would be private (equiv to 192.168.x.x) ...
basically, none of the hosts behind NAT need a public IP, *but* I may
end up with more then 256 hosts,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 02:27:02AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Within my Linksys, I can restrict wireless to MAC addresses, as well as using
stuff like WPA ... quick search on google, and I found:
Hi Max,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 10:48:52AM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
Okay. libpcap 0.9.8 and tcpdump 3.9.8 are now imported into HEAD and
RELENG_7.
Thank you for updating these two components!
Regards,
Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpP4hT3J34WE.pgp
Description: PGP
On 2007-10-19 10:48, Max Laier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay. libpcap 0.9.8 and tcpdump 3.9.8 are now imported into HEAD and
RELENG_7. Is anyone eager to pull it down to RELENG_6 as well,
because I don't have the resources available at the moment. The
update was crucial to me in HEAD and
25 matches
Mail list logo
