IIRC, there is some problems with the driver in FreeBSD for these
network cards. My guess is you've got a newer Dell server? Your only
real option is to install a different network card.
Eric Crist
On Nov 24, 2007, at 8:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
We have problem with
Hello
EFC IIRC, there is some problems with the driver in FreeBSD for these
EFC network cards. My guess is you've got a newer Dell server? Your only
EFC real option is to install a different network card.
This is Intel blade SBXD132, same as IBM HS21
Both integrated NICs - Broadcom
After portupgrading two samba servers, I cannot connect any more to them
through mount_smbfs. Connecting from Windows works fine.
Am I the only one who is experiencing this problem?
bye Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
I would like to ask, whether there are any plans to implement multiple
route tables, like OpenBSD did:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2006-10/2665.html
I'm well aware of fact that i can do policy routing via pf/ipf/ipfw as well of
http://imunes.tel.fer.hr/virtnet/
I'm afraid
mosaic wrote:
I would like to ask, whether there are any plans to implement multiple
route tables, like OpenBSD did:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2006-10/2665.html
I'm well aware of fact that i can do policy routing via pf/ipf/ipfw as well of
On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote:
attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks, which
are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposure before doing
the switch, but I don't expect any fallout. This email is going
On Saturday 24 November 2007, Max Laier wrote:
On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote:
attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks,
which are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposure before
doing the switch, but
Max Laier wrote:
On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote:
attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks, which
are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposure before doing
the switch, but I don't expect any fallout. This
On Saturday 24 November 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Max Laier wrote:
On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote:
attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks,
which are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposure before
Max Laier wrote:
On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote:
attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks, which
are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposure before doing
the switch, but I don't expect any fallout. This
10 matches
Mail list logo
