Re: Intel XL710 broken link down detection?

I think the early versions of the description of the command were vague, so that's why it got everyone. We caught it and fixed it a few days ago internally. On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, 8:37 AM Jack Vogel wrote: > LOL, Damn, what's the world coming to when you can't trust them Linux

Re: Intel XL710 broken link down detection?

LOL, Damn, what's the world coming to when you can't trust them Linux guys :) Jack On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Ryan Stone wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Steven Hartland > wrote: > >> Comparing this to the Linux driver which does

[Bug 202680] Silent data corruption on em(4) interfaces

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202680 --- Comment #22 from Yaniv Kunda --- (In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #21) I've set the value to -1 (in loader.conf), rebooted, and verified the new value using sysctl. In contrast to Dmitry, the problem happens for

[Bug 202680] Silent data corruption on em(4) interfaces

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202680 --- Comment #21 from Sean Bruno --- Can you folks try setting the processing limits to -1? I'm curious if what you're seeing is a symptom of conflicting processing during interrupt context and deferred handling to the

Re: Intel XL710 broken link down detection?

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Steven Hartland wrote: > Comparing this to the Linux driver which does detect the link down I've > discovered it actually polls the link status by default in its watchdog. > > Disabling this with "ethtool --set-priv-flags eth1 LinkPolling

Intel XL710 broken link down detection?

Seems the Intel XL710 (ixl) has broken link detection, it triggers on link up but not on link down. I'm currently running HEAD (r290610) on the box which has 1.4.3 and have tried the latest driver from downloads.intel.com which is listed as 1.4.8 but reports 1.4.5. We've updated to the

Business proposal - advertising

Hi, I want to buy your mobile traffic. I have amazing results with similar companies like you, I believe it will be very profitable working together! We pay fix CPM and guarantee high quality offers. Pls contact me Liat -- [image: VELIS MEDIA] *Liat Tessone**|* *Mobile **Media

Re: Intel XL710 broken link down detection?

Comparing this to the Linux driver which does detect the link down I've discovered it actually polls the link status by default in its watchdog. Disabling this with "ethtool --set-priv-flags eth1 LinkPolling off" and the Linux driver also fails to detect link down. So this seems like a

[Bug 203630] [Hyper-V] [nat] [tcp] 10.2 NAT bug in TCP stack or hyperv netsvc driver

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203630 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||mfc-stable9?,

[Bug 204437] 10.2 STABLE Crashing with IPSec Support

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204437 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||crash, needs-qa

[Bug 15095] TCP's advertised window is not scaled immediately upon discovering use of Window scale option

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15095 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org

[Bug 129719] [nfs] [panic] Panic during shutdown, tcp_ctloutput: inp == NULL

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129719 Dan Nelson changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |Overcome By

[Bug 92690] [tcp] slowstart_flightsize ignored in 6-STABLE

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92690 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|si...@freebsd.org

[Bug 108670] [tcp] TCP connection ETIMEDOUT

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108670 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|si...@freebsd.org

[Bug 54309] TCP Packet of 64K-1 crashes FreeBSD4.8

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54309 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|si...@freebsd.org

[Bug 54309] TCP Packet of 64K-1 crashes FreeBSD4.8

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54309 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||crash, needs-qa

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-patch |patch ---

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 --- Comment #12 from Kubilay Kocak --- Looks like I missed the review creation, ignore my last comment, except for the 'needs a committer/assignee' bit ;D -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

[Differential] [Updated, 12 lines] D4129: Bug 204438 - setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

cameronsparr_gmail.com removed rS FreeBSD src repository as the repository for this revision. cameronsparr_gmail.com updated this revision to Diff 10121. cameronsparr_gmail.com added a comment. spaces to tabs CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4129?vs=10120=10121

[Differential] [Updated] D4129: Bug 204438 - setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

cameronsparr_gmail.com updated the summary for this revision. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4129 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: cameronsparr_gmail.com, Contributor Reviewers, network Cc: freebsd-net-list, imp

[Bug 75122] [netinet] [patch] Incorrect inflight bandwidth calculation on first packet

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75122 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|si...@freebsd.org

[Bug 76504] Keep-alives doesn't work on half-closed sockets.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76504 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 82470] FreeBSD advertises wrong window scale in some situations

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82470 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 --- Comment #6 from Cameron Sparr --- Created attachment 163023 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=163023=edit Patch of the diff in the URL section. Changes behavior of setsockopt This change

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 --- Comment #8 from Allan Jude --- There is a command line tool for Phabricator called 'arcanist' (devel/php5-arcanist) that simplifies posting patches to PHabriactor. It works with svn and git. Or, via the

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 --- Comment #9 from NGie Cooper --- This wiki page describes how our current code review process works: https://wiki.freebsd.org/CodeReview -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 --- Comment #7 from Cameron Sparr --- @Kubilay I realized that I actually have no idea how to use svn/phabricator, so I'm just going to attach a patch to this case. Let me know how it looks, thank you. -- You are

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 Cameron Sparr changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://github.com/sparrc/f

[Differential] [Updated] D4129: Bug 204438 - setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

cameronsparr_gmail.com added a reviewer: network. cameronsparr_gmail.com added a subscriber: freebsd-net-list. REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4129 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To:

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 --- Comment #10 from Cameron Sparr --- Got it, thanks for the link, I put up a review on phabricator. May I suggest you put a link to the wiki (https://wiki.freebsd.org/CodeReview) on the homepage of the phabricator