https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276890
--- Comment #3 from Dave Taht ---
One of the issues with the freebsd implementation appears to be too much
logging:
https://forum.opnsense.org/index.php?topic=39046.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276674
--- Comment #12 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=38983d40c18ec5705dcba19ac320b86c5efe8e7e
commit 38983d40c18ec5705dcba19ac320b86c5efe8e7e
Author:
Hi everyone,
I am coming here from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2771971160
TL;DR:
* I have a FreeBSD14 Server and Client with an Intel X540 (ix) adaptor each.
* I am trying to improve the NFS throughput.
* I get 1160 MiB/s via nc, but only ~200 MiB/s via NFS.
* Increasing
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277286
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276890
--- Comment #5 from Dave Taht ---
I am a little dubious about the "active" idea.
http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/netpfil/ipfw/dn_sched_fq_codel.c#L413
Also.
if (!si->flows[idx].active ) {
319
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277286
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |emulat...@freebsd.org
--
You are
> On Feb 24, 2024, at 7:18 PM, Hannes Hauswedell wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am coming here from
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2771971160
>
> TL;DR:
>
> * I have a FreeBSD14 Server and Client with an Intel X540 (ix) adaptor each.
> * I am trying to improve the NFS
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276890
--- Comment #4 from Dave Taht ---
Assuming I am looking at a correct source tree:
http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/netpfil/ipfw/dn_sched_fq_codel.c#L330
Logging an overflow event twice, and to the console, while under stress, is not
a
