Dear all:
When looking into the soclose() in uipc_socket.c, I thought of one
possible situation.
If thread A called soclose() first, and then execute sorele() then
sofree(). However, in sofree() (defined in uipc_socket.c), the socket
mutex and accept mutex is unlocked first before releasing
Hello, Guys!
I'm trying to restrict some LAN access by arp permanent entries. But it
didn't work or it didn't work as I realize it. For example I have the
following perm entries:
user1: (82.199.215.195) at 00:0f:ea:a4:60:c5 on vlan804 permanent [vlan]
user2: (82.199.215.196) at
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
We have a setup that looks like the following.
pc -ethernet- freebsd 4.9 -pppoe- internet -ethernet- freebsd 6.1
on the freebsd box we have a gre tunnel with a mtu of 1420 feeding into a
gif vpn tunnel with a mtu of 1280 ( I know this dumb but it the default
Hello, Guys!
I'm trying to restrict some LAN access by arp permanent entries. But it
didn't work or it didn't work as I realize it. For example I have the
following perm entries:
user1: (82.199.215.195) at 00:0f:ea:a4:60:c5 on vlan804 permanent [vlan]
user2: (82.199.215.196) at
Hi, all!
I have such a problem when configuring the gateway for my LAN:
I want to minimize the number of rules, and for this purpose I chose PF,
but, as I wrote earlyer:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2007-January/002958.html
and found some mails of other people:
Hello.
A 6.1p13/i386 firewall of mine, although a bit rusty wrt hardware, is
working wonderfully and is allowing us to fully exploit our Internet
connections (1Mb/s).
Today it suddenly dropped to a bare few b/s. I checked the ISP line by
attaching another machine in place of this and it
Alexander Motin wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
if the pc sends a packet of 1460 bytes with the DF bit set shouldn't the
freebsd 4.9 system
send back an icmp dest unreachable - fragmentation needed and DF bit
set?
Are you blocking icmp with a firewall filter?
Good question -
Tom Judge wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
We have a setup that looks like the following.
pc -ethernet- freebsd 4.9 -pppoe- internet -ethernet- freebsd 6.1
on the freebsd box we have a gre tunnel with a mtu of 1420 feeding into a
gif vpn tunnel with a mtu of 1280 ( I know this
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
Further testing with drivers is needed (I can't be 100% sure it fails
with msk(4) because something strange is happening when vlan tagging is
turned off). Perhaps Pyun knows?
I guess I've not merged local changes before committing to HEAD.
How about attached
Hi,
I have tested my 802.1p input patch with vlans configured. So far so good.
It is now available from:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~bms/dump/latest-8021p.diff
This updated patch moves the 802.1q encapsulation into if_ethersubr.c,
allowing
M_VLANTAG to be passed up and down the stack for
I was playing with some BPF ideas for few days and I added two new
features. SEESENT flag is extended to see only outgoing packets,
which is analogous to libpcap's PCAP_D_OUT direction. Thus SEESENT
is now called DIRECTION. Second feature is feedback mode (sort of
simulated hardware
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Today it suddenly dropped to a bare few b/s. I checked the ISP line by
attaching another machine in place of this and it could do full 1Mb/s,
so this box was the problem.
After a simple reboot it started working as good as always.
Now the question is: in case this
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:38:21PM +, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
Further testing with drivers is needed (I can't be 100% sure it fails
with msk(4) because something strange is happening when vlan tagging is
turned off). Perhaps Pyun knows?
I guess
13 matches
Mail list logo
